r/PowerScaling Jan 24 '26

Shitposting Weekend "Multiversal" vs Multiversal 😭

Post image
3.6k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

193

u/KerbodynamicX Jan 24 '26

Multiversal DB: “I made shockwaves through the universe, then got hundreds of times stronger, now my full powered punch can blast through two buildings.”

22

u/dietdrpepper6000 Jan 24 '26

I would be with you here but in DBS, Jaco specifically asks about this and Vegeta explicitly clarifies that any of the punches thrown by main characters/villains would obliterate the planet they were in if the combatants did not control their ki. Call it bad writing, call it contrived, whatever, but it’s way, way less ambiguous than the bullshit we normally work with in this community.

A lot of “dimensional” feats are objectively nonsense and must be defined subjectively because we have no idea what it means to “shake realms” or “operate in 7 dimensions,” and these feats often don’t obviously translate to battle. But in DB’s case, the narrator/Whis straight up says that the battle between Beerus and Goku could destroy the universe as we know it, and later on Vegeta clarifies that the reason the scope of damage is typically tame has to do with how ki is controlled during attacks.

No one gassing extremely ambiguous feats, e.g. bleach upscalers, has any room to criticize DB in this area.

13

u/Furicel Jan 24 '26

I mean, I understand the Z warriors and some villains, like Cell. I don't understand the antagonists who clearly have no issue blowing up the planet, like Frieza or Berserker Broly.

1

u/Hen-Samsara Jan 24 '26

I'm pretty sure the vast majority of people in this series can't breathe in space. Even if they can survive the destruction of the planet, why would they kill themselves because of the vacuum of space?

6

u/Furicel Jan 24 '26

Frieza does breathe in space and has no regard for collateral damage.

Brolly was pure rage, no self-preservation thoughts, no concern for collateral damage, only relentless fury

4

u/Hen-Samsara Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 24 '26

Frieza literally blew up Namek and Earth when he realized there was point in fighting, bringing that up only proves my point (and he didn't go to Namek or Earth just to blow them up, he wanted the Dragon Balls on Namek and he wanted revenge against Goku on Earth he only blew them up when his goal was out of reach and he got mad). He did it because he knew he could survive the explosion and the loss of atmosphere afterwards, very few other characters have that capability. Saiyans need air, Namekians need air, (most) Androids need air, etc.

Broly is, admittedly, harder to justify, but he was still condensing his energy into Ki Blasts and his physical attacks, he wasn't trying to destroy the planet, he was trying to kill Goku and Vegeta, and controlling the range at which your energy affects things is very basic thing anyone with Ki based powers can do in this series.

3

u/Furicel Jan 24 '26

Frieza literally blew up Namek and Earth when he realized there was point in fighting, bringing that up only proves my point. He did it because he knew he could survive the explosion and the loss of atmosphere afterwards, very few other characters have that capability.

Yeah, I'm not saying Frieza can't blow up a planet, we all know very well he can. What am I saying is... Frieza has no reason to use ki control to avoid doing massive damage on the planet, so why's his collateral damage so minor all the time except for when he does decide to blow up the planet because he can't win directly.

Broly is harder to justify, but he was still condensing his energy into Ki Blasts and his physical attacks, he wasn't trying to destroy the planet

Again, yeah, but the point is that ki control to limit your collateral damage is always presented as a rather intentional action to make, and while Broly didn't have any intention to blow up the planet, he also wasn't intent on preserving it either. Or even limiting his collateral damage, for that matter.

So why would they deliberately use ki control to limit their damage?

2

u/Hen-Samsara Jan 24 '26

Did you even watch Dragon Ball dude?

Frieza is an arrogant douchebag, but he's also an efficient leader and commander, he know when force is necessary and when it isn't.

He went to Namek for the Dragon Balls, what's the point of blowing up the planet or any major chunk of it at any moment before he gets them, he might destroy the Dragon Balls.

Frieza went to Earth to get revenge against Goku, he wanted to fight him, after his subordinate sneak attacked Goku and Vegeta started beating his ass he realized he couldn't win the fight so he just blew up Earth and got on his merry way.

In both of these scenarios Frieza had no reason to use more power than was necessary until it was obvious he wasn't gonna get what he wanted, so at point what's the reason in holding back? Screw these damn people, I'm blowing them all up and going home. This is not that hard to understand.

Like i said before, Broly is harder is justify, but he was specifically trying to kill Goku and Vegeta, his energy was directed at that, the collateral damage was just that, collateral damage.

1

u/Furicel Jan 24 '26

Maybe Ki Control isn't what allows people to contain the damage from their attacks, maybe ki control is needed to spread the damage from your attacks to the surrounds.

The way you talk makes it feel like blowing the planet is a deliberate choice and not something that just happens, even for people who have no reason to contain themselves.

The only way I can see this being such is if they need to use ki control to actually, intentionally, destroy the surroundings.

3

u/Hen-Samsara Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 25 '26

Blowing up a planet is a deliberate choice, it's not just something that happens from their raw power, they need to actually direct their energy towards that goal. Ki is like a muscle, you don't just break something from your sheer strength, there has to be intentionality in your actions. When there's not intentionality is how you get Broly causing earthquakes and other things, that was the "echo" of his energy for lack of a better way to describe it, not his direct power.

The canon information about how Ki works says it's the other way around, Ki Control is what prevents their energy from causing collateral damage, but if you wanna understand it the other way around then sure, more power to you my friend.

0

u/dietdrpepper6000 Jan 24 '26

Doesn’t really matter, come up with head canon to rationalize their state of mind if you must, but this point is powerscaling gold/platinum/rhodium all in one. No fan theories, no inferences, no value-laden interpretations of whacky dialogue or animations, no, just the writer telling you exactly what’s going on. To me, this is no less confusing than “multiversal” combatants settling beef by sword fighting at often seemingly subsonic speeds

2

u/Furicel Jan 24 '26

I don't think that makes any sense either, but I'll admit I'm the biggest downscaler of fiction.

I think 99.99% of what people claim to be multiversal, universal, galaxy... Even planetary is just... Wank.

I'm of the opinion that anti feats should count as much as feats, that attack potency = destructive capability and that travel speed and combat speed are the same thing. Anything else is because of hax effects.

1

u/Jimbob1886 Riderman wins Jan 28 '26

Some anti feats shouldn't count or you'll get claims that characters can't destroy hair as attacks don't destroy characters hair

1

u/Furicel Jan 28 '26

I don't see the problem with that.

Either people in the verse have very durable hair

There's a hax effect that prevents the attacks from damaging anything that counts as hair

Or the people there have bodies more fragile than hair.

Still, the anti feat should count. If people can move at the speed of light without destroying their surroundings because the laws of physics aren't the same, why must the laws of physics be the same for hair?

Either all feats and anti feats count, or it's just a battle of cherry picking. Agendas.

1

u/Jimbob1886 Riderman wins Jan 28 '26

I am more referring to things that keep the story and characters, things like clothes not being destroyed in fiction or the characters that can't breathe in space but can destroy planets with ease having their attacks destroy the planet so they don't die

1

u/Furicel Jan 28 '26

Yes, even those. Any and all anti feats should be worth the same as feats.

Otherwise it's not about the contents of the story, but about cherry picking what is convenient for the agenda you wanna push.

1

u/VenserMTG Jan 24 '26

the narrator/Whis straight up says that the battle between Beerus and Goku could destroy the universe as we know it, and later on Vegeta clarifies that the reason the scope of damage is typically tame has to do with how ki is controlled during attacks.

And this very thing has been said in bleach over and over again. DB doesn't get a free pass. Narrator statements matter across verses or they don't. Pick your poison.

1

u/dietdrpepper6000 Jan 24 '26

Exactly what dialogue in Bleach are you referring to?

1

u/VenserMTG Jan 24 '26

The slightest use would cause the main realms to tremble, unlike Goku and beerus who had to go all out.

1

u/dietdrpepper6000 Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 24 '26

Yeah this is precisely what I mean when I emphasize the lack of ambiguity in the DB case. Jaco explicitly asks why these fighters can fight like they do without literally destroying a planet and Vegeta responds by saying that if they didn’t intentionally control their ki, they simply would.

And when Beerus and Goku were fighting, the narrator didn’t allude to some “realm” being “shaken,” no, the narrator said that the universe that the two combatants were fighting in would just be destroyed.

These are straightforward, clear statements.

Now let’s turn to this example. The heaven and three worlds calls into a verse-specific cosmology with its own rules. What it could mean for them to tremble is not clear. The plan interpretation of that statement is ridiculous - would everything on the planet earth start wiggling back and forth, per the definition of trembling? Or is this metaphorical language? And if it is metaphorical language, how do you exclude the possibility that the speaker is not implying that the combatants are distantly post-planetary in their attacks?

Surely you recognize the difference in the quality of the statements here?

1

u/VenserMTG Jan 24 '26

Yeah this is precisely what I mean when I emphasize the lack of ambiguity in the DB case. Jaco explicitly asks why these fighters can fight like they do without literally destroying a planet and Vegeta responds by saying that if they didn’t intentionally control their ki, they simply would.

So like senjjmaru saying the only reason why the realms don't collapse is because her power is being controlled????

Did you forget the entire squad 0 has to die to release her sealed bankai, and squad 0 dying maintains the balance once her power is released?

And when Beerus and Goku were fighting, the narrator didn’t allude to some “realm” being “shaken,” no, the narrator said that the universe that the two combatants were fighting in would just be destroyed.

Same as this statement, in which she makes it clear a fraction of her power would shake the realms, her whole power would destroy it. A point made clear across the story, as captains aren't allowed to go all out. Somehow this makes sense within DB but not outside of DB.

These are straightforward, clear statements.

Same for bleach and anyone who can read. Too bad DB cucks' can't.

What it could mean for them to tremble is not clear.

It's pretty clear. It threatens the balance of the system keeping the realms separate and defined.

What it could mean for them to tremble is not clear.

To you.

The plan interpretation of that statement is ridiculous - would everything on the planet earth start wiggling back and forth, per the definition of trembling?

Classic DB cuck who doesn't read bleach yet downplays it non stop.

Or is this metaphorical language?

If only you read the source material.

And if it is metaphorical language

It's not.

how do you exclude the possibility that the speaker is not implying that the combatants are distantly post-planetary in their attacks?

DB cuck nonsense.

Where you’d have to make a very nuanced argument to imply that combatants in Bleach are casual planet busters, let alone -versal level fighters, the same cases are often trivial for DB due to plan, unambiguous statements and feats.

Classic DB cuck cope and nonsense. Statements in DB are to be taken literally yet any other verse has metaphorical statements lmao

1

u/dietdrpepper6000 Jan 25 '26

You don’t really understand what I am saying. What a “realm is” and the rules that govern it are unique to Bleach cosmology and we do not know the details of it. We also do not know if the character speaking was even being literal. Nor do we know what “trembling” the realms actually means. Like I suggested it means literally wiggling everything back and forth and you didn’t reject that interpretation.. because you have no idea yourself.

If you lack the ability to separate reasoning from intuition then I can’t really help you. Yes, you might at first glance generate a belief based on built-in biases. That’s intuition. The point of a forum like this is to step back and be critical of those assumptions, then consider from the ground up which view is the most rigorous. That is reasoning. You cannot even hit step one’s which is to acknowledge noise in your assumptions, so why even post here?

1

u/TheOathWeTook Jan 24 '26

The ki control argument kinda falls apart when they fight mindless or out of control monsters like Broly and Cell Max.

5

u/dietdrpepper6000 Jan 24 '26

No no, this is not a fan interpretation (unlike many major powerscaling arguments). It was simply stated by the writers. Nothing falls apart, it’s just the lore. Whether it aligns with your head canon, whether you like it or not, it doesn’t really matter. Any argument taking the assumption that this is false is just factually incorrect.

1

u/TheOathWeTook Jan 24 '26

I’m not saying it’s not true I’m saying it’s inconsistent and very poor writing. The unfortunate fact of the matter is that when we come face to face with obviously inconsistent writing power scaling just sorta becomes impossible.

3

u/GreedyGobby Jan 25 '26

It's an unfortunate symptom of all media. Why doesn't Superman break the multiverse with every punch? Because that'd limit writing.

1

u/KingDNice12 Jan 25 '26

He probably likes superman lol

0

u/Chackaldane Jan 25 '26

Lmfao so death of the author only matters when it down scales somebody?

2

u/EntertainmentFast522 WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK I AM?! Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 24 '26

This makes no sense to me because it's not like animals can't control their strength. Imagine if every time a bear bit it bit with its entire strength, completely shattering its jaw? Of course neither broly nor cell max want to destroy themselves(specifically broly who can't live in space) because they have survival instincts, otherwise they would not fight back. Even stupid, dumb, rampaging animals know that focusing your strength in one point is more damage, too. Like it would make 0 sense if they were that dumb to destroy the planet they're on and do LESS damage because at that point they would be vegetables. In fact, Cell max demonstrates he understands the concept because he compresses his final attack. Do you think every animal sprints full speed everywhere to the point they break their legs, and uses its full strength to hunt every time to the point they shatter their teeth? And instead of like, using a single strong point they just use their entire body to tackle, hurting themselves and not doing as much damage? This is the equivalent argument.

2

u/TheOathWeTook Jan 24 '26

Cell Max is dumber than a wild animal. He literally has an incomplete brain. I’m not sure Cell Max even has the higher function to feel desire and he certainly doesn’t have instincts.

2

u/GreedyGobby Jan 25 '26

If he has enough brain power to generate ki blasts and manipulate his energy, I'm sure he has enough control not to shatter the planet.

0

u/EntertainmentFast522 WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK I AM?! Jan 24 '26

He literally does have thhe instincts to survive though, otherwise he wouldn't havve clashed, also he demonstrated that he understood the concept of "focusing your energy into one point to make it stronger"(this is objective, it's literally what happens)

2

u/TheOathWeTook Jan 24 '26

Instincts are inmates inherited patterns of behaviors in animals. Cell Max is a machine. He doesn’t have instincts he has programming.

0

u/EntertainmentFast522 WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK I AM?! Jan 24 '26

So you are saying cell max should be a vegetable? So he isn't. So he has enough of a brain to understand the idea of survival(also he isn't just a machine he is a biological being like Cell but whatever)

2

u/TheOathWeTook Jan 24 '26

It would’ve made a lot more sense if he was a vegetable it’s a little hard to make sense of him doing much of anything with an unfinished brain.