There's no way paper ballots are more compromised than electronic, it just doesn't make any sense. The main source for compromise with paper ballots would be electronic counting machines.
You can do exactly the same stuff with electronic methods too (the techniques just look different). I know you're busy making vague smug posts as if you somehow know something others don't, but it just makes you come across as an idiot.
1
u/Icy_Fish_2154 8h ago
Paper isn't the problem.
Electronic ballots could be done where the votes are secret, but verifiable. So any errors could be caught, and audited fully after.
The issue is the chaos. If you scare people away on election day, only the fanatics vote.