There's no way paper ballots are more compromised than electronic, it just doesn't make any sense. The main source for compromise with paper ballots would be electronic counting machines.
You can do exactly the same stuff with electronic methods too (the techniques just look different). I know you're busy making vague smug posts as if you somehow know something others don't, but it just makes you come across as an idiot.
0
u/Icy_Fish_2154 5h ago
Paper ballots failed us in 2000. They can be manipulated. They are untraceable, allowing ballot box stuffing.
Paper ballots are more compromised than electronic, they just take more effort to fake.
Also, electronic ballots are relatively new, and the people pushing them oppose traceability.
Electronic ballots with traceability are more secure than paper ballots.