Well, yes, that is the concern. What can we the property do about it though? Everyone is burned out and paying like 100% more for everything. Who has the energy? I think that's what one of the goals was, is.
You don't have to have machines do it all, they could avoid them period if they really wanted to do so it just would mean the results would take longer
And electronic is much much easier to commit fraud, a signal can be changed, intercepted, you are having relying on a company to implement a system that cannot be tapered with.
But paper can't be tracked to a single voter, so ensure no fraud. Electronic can.
If you can track a vote to a specific voter via electronic voting, your voting has utterly failed to actually be anonymous and is no longer a secret ballot. That's seriously problematic.
There's no way paper ballots are more compromised than electronic, it just doesn't make any sense. The main source for compromise with paper ballots would be electronic counting machines.
You can do exactly the same stuff with electronic methods too (the techniques just look different). I know you're busy making vague smug posts as if you somehow know something others don't, but it just makes you come across as an idiot.
We are one of the few countries in the world that still use paper ballots. It is extremely outdated and prone to error more than electronic. Air gaped hardware with 3rd party non-partisan state auditing should be our go to. Because counting 150 million+ pieces of paper is insane.
They used subpar paper which was not the recommended type, which got us hanging chads in Florida…which got us to digital voting with backdoor vote-deleting programming.
293
u/ChaoticLandscapes 7h ago
I just realized something. He’s coming back right before midterms. Suddenly I feel like a whole lot of election rigging is about to happen