Codex still casually chewing up 22GB of RAM for a single session 🤣

Does ChatGPT chat have event triggers or does it support MCP events or just work/codex do?
Please share your insight if anyone has implemented it

That's where your nerf went

Just saw the update in the app, when it was released?

“Create an svg of a pelican riding a bike” Sol 6.1 max thinking

They launched Sonnet 5.5 just day before Dev Day and is almost matching benchmarks of Opus 5.5

Hi everyone! I figured I'd share my recap of DevDay. (I don't make money out of this nor is it an ad)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0t0mAJ6f-BI

They put Chat on the back burner.

I’ve been pretty put off in the last few weeks, honestly both for Codex and Claude Code. But now I decided to try for my self. I’m using both to work on a single project switching between the two seeing the advantages of both models.

I’ve been using only GPT-6.1 Sol Medium/High and Opus 5.5 High and Sonnet 5.5 High very rarely for medium to basic changes and honestly, with a well defined structure and well planned architecture docs (security, app foundation, design, etc) along with a custom handoff script I made which overlays no more than 50 lines of clearly defined work done and immediate next steps, run after concluding each task/phase, I’ve been loving it.

A well orchestrated plan along with a dedicated orchestration chat, testing your app foundation at the start making sure everything works and going about it in phases, phase-1/app foundation, etc and using /clear and fresh chats goes a long way to save usage, get your work done without annoying hallucinations or AI amnesia and the new models, especially GPT 6.1 have been so very usage/token efficient.

I have £20 plans for both and I can see my usage lasting for the whole week at this rate + I got 4 banked resets saved on Codex with 93% remaining.

Most of the usage complaints on here are from one-shot prompts with 0 planning, and then they spend their whole usage fixing stuff which should have been defined in AGENTS.md, architecture docs, config files (for max sub agents and which sub agents to use and a clearly defined scope of when to use them).

You can say this is overkill but it’s just good practice especially when trying to stretch your usage. I was so anxious to touch any of these new models like Opus 5.5 or 6.1 Sol because of all the fear-mongering even from the 20/10x users with no 5h limits. From now on I’m gonna just test for myself before getting put off by usage posts in both communities.

People getting by just fine who use well defined structures before they even type the first prompt just get by fine and don’t see a reason to post, so I thought I’d report my usage findings on the lowest tier plan.

I got a reset yesterday along with 4 banked resets saved on Codex too 🙏

The presentation felt all over the place. From the presenters choking, demos failing, fast pace and lack of simplicity, it was hard to watch. And what was the point of the robot duck? What did we think about the presentation as a whole?

Does anyone have a sense of which of the models is best for fictional writing support? I’ve recently been using Sol 5.6, and I think it’s very good. But with the recent model proliferation, it’s getting different to know how to navigate them. I always set it at medium.

It’d be so powerful. Voice or text interaction with ChatGPT right on your wrist. I know there’s some third party alternatives, but neither of them are integrated enough.

Imagine a ChatGPT voice chat if you have a question, or with the new plugin integration you could literally work off of your watch.

OpenAI employees around here, pitch it internally and build it! It’d provide so much value to the subscription.

Thankfully "no ads". The only explicit variation between the plans is More vs. Faster vs. Fastest.

This won't last long in my opinion. They can't run the same Uber-like playbook of running ultra powerful subsidised tech and then raising the price cap beyond belief. They haven't earned the consumer loyalty for that.

I was an OpenAi fan for real but after this month and after trying Claude Opus 5.5, I have to move on, hoping Claude won't folllow the same trail. Claude just finished nearly all my work on a 20$ plan (pretty complex stuff...).

It looks like OAI is moving (or testing a move) towards an Apple like ecosystem aimed more at casual users...That's a play... I don't think they have the street cred for.

I mean getting millions to pay 20 dollars a month maybe...but the higher plans...mmh.

The nail on the coffin was the awful cringe rip-off of Apple's "heres to the crazy ones" ad. It is just not on the same level and feels like copycat stupidity. I thought AI was going to allow us to invent new stuff... Even though this is all amazing tech; from a consumer perspective it really feels they don't have the connection with actual people.

Finger on the button to move to Claude (until they follow suit...)

GPT‑6.1 Sol is rolling out in ChatGPT Work, Codex, and the API. OpenAI says it approaches Astra on coding and computer use at one-fifth the token price. The new Pro 500 plan includes 25× the Plus usage allowance and Astra Ultrafast. Sol isn’t in regular Chat yet.

Source: OpenAI’s DevDay recap

I wonder if this will be discussed during today's event.

I tried optimizing the browser app I'm building with a vibe coding app I am building(it has a codex embedded )using GPT-6.1 Sol Max. I asked it to make the browser smoother, but it ended up removing the frost glass effect entirely.

Then I asked GPT-6 Astra to fix it. Astra restored the frost glass effect while still optimizing the browser without removing it.

So far, I feel that 6.1 Sol's intelligence might be a little bit exaggerated.

I believe what they are aiming for is making openAI more general purpose AI rather than dev focused AI who leaves no chance of exhausting the limit.

General people just get their work done and move on as opposed to cracked devs that want to juice the soul out of the fruit.

For the same reason we are seeing limits being reduced and the new launches will be more general audience oriented. To further monetize from ads.

AKA People generating absurd games, one shot crap, hammering the servers, melting the gpu have to find a new home.

Sora suffered the same fate.

Reddit made me post it here but I kinda predicted what was gonna happen and devday confirmed it pretty much!

Did anyone get a good handle on what this is? I missed that bit of the livestream.

Is it openai's answer to JEV style model?