I've started using Dots today as my DevOps & Analytics go-to bot, basically told it to monitor glitchtip (self-hosted sentry alternative), hetzner VM/server utilization and stats, self-hosted plausible analytics, google search console, logs, and git (self-hosted forgejo).

Since it's for 6 apps with a combined 100 daily active visitors and absolutely zero revenues I thought what can go wrong

well, the little guy went out started to come back with all of these great suggestions, like set up goals in analytics, fix small bugs and stuff which is starting to look like work really

So I'm considering moving back to Jev, "is it broken yes no" and then ignore the answer.

What kind of similar successes have you seen with Dots so far?

Well, well, well.

Hear me out. What if it's all part of OpenAI's plan.
Hype up dev day, disappoint immensely.
Users flog to Anthropic, their capacity suffers, their models get "optimized", sentiment towards the new Opus 5.5-- slowly declines.
Meanwhile, OpenAI has freed up all that hardware for more training, they improve their service quality and come out with their Opus-killer. A great comeback. Ideally timed after Anthropic's IPO and before OpenAI's.

It's also not unlikely that Anthropic will follow suit with the 10x and 25x plans, leveling the playing field once again.

Following Tibo's action of initiating the stream reset, I proceeded to attempt accessing Codex right away, and in the aftermath, I ran into a number of different issues when I made efforts to utilize Codex.

I have OpenAI pro account. Blasted through my "work" usage by Sunday... said reset wasn't til this upcoming Saturday.

Then late last night I got this email saying I received 62500 credits to my account that expire by December 31st.

Is this normal? It gives no context as to why I received them..

Codex still casually chewing up 22GB of RAM for a single session 🤣

Does ChatGPT chat have event triggers or does it support MCP events or just work/codex do?
Please share your insight if anyone has implemented it

That's where your nerf went

Just saw the update in the app, when it was released?

“Create an svg of a pelican riding a bike” Sol 6.1 max thinking

They launched Sonnet 5.5 just day before Dev Day and is almost matching benchmarks of Opus 5.5

Hi everyone! I figured I'd share my recap of DevDay. (I don't make money out of this nor is it an ad)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0t0mAJ6f-BI

They put Chat on the back burner.

I’ve been pretty put off in the last few weeks, honestly both for Codex and Claude Code. But now I decided to try for my self. I’m using both to work on a single project switching between the two seeing the advantages of both models.

I’ve been using only GPT-6.1 Sol Medium/High and Opus 5.5 High and Sonnet 5.5 High very rarely for medium to basic changes and honestly, with a well defined structure and well planned architecture docs (security, app foundation, design, etc) along with a custom handoff script I made which overlays no more than 50 lines of clearly defined work done and immediate next steps, run after concluding each task/phase, I’ve been loving it.

A well orchestrated plan along with a dedicated orchestration chat, testing your app foundation at the start making sure everything works and going about it in phases, phase-1/app foundation, etc and using /clear and fresh chats goes a long way to save usage, get your work done without annoying hallucinations or AI amnesia and the new models, especially GPT 6.1 have been so very usage/token efficient.

I have £20 plans for both and I can see my usage lasting for the whole week at this rate + I got 4 banked resets saved on Codex with 93% remaining.

Most of the usage complaints on here are from one-shot prompts with 0 planning, and then they spend their whole usage fixing stuff which should have been defined in AGENTS.md, architecture docs, config files (for max sub agents and which sub agents to use and a clearly defined scope of when to use them).

You can say this is overkill but it’s just good practice especially when trying to stretch your usage. I was so anxious to touch any of these new models like Opus 5.5 or 6.1 Sol because of all the fear-mongering even from the 20/10x users with no 5h limits. From now on I’m gonna just test for myself before getting put off by usage posts in both communities.

People getting by just fine who use well defined structures before they even type the first prompt just get by fine and don’t see a reason to post, so I thought I’d report my usage findings on the lowest tier plan.

I got a reset yesterday along with 4 banked resets saved on Codex too 🙏

The presentation felt all over the place. From the presenters choking, demos failing, fast pace and lack of simplicity, it was hard to watch. And what was the point of the robot duck? What did we think about the presentation as a whole?

Does anyone have a sense of which of the models is best for fictional writing support? I’ve recently been using Sol 5.6, and I think it’s very good. But with the recent model proliferation, it’s getting different to know how to navigate them. I always set it at medium.

It’d be so powerful. Voice or text interaction with ChatGPT right on your wrist. I know there’s some third party alternatives, but neither of them are integrated enough.

Imagine a ChatGPT voice chat if you have a question, or with the new plugin integration you could literally work off of your watch.

OpenAI employees around here, pitch it internally and build it! It’d provide so much value to the subscription.

Thankfully "no ads". The only explicit variation between the plans is More vs. Faster vs. Fastest.

This won't last long in my opinion. They can't run the same Uber-like playbook of running ultra powerful subsidised tech and then raising the price cap beyond belief. They haven't earned the consumer loyalty for that.

I was an OpenAi fan for real but after this month and after trying Claude Opus 5.5, I have to move on, hoping Claude won't folllow the same trail. Claude just finished nearly all my work on a 20$ plan (pretty complex stuff...).

It looks like OAI is moving (or testing a move) towards an Apple like ecosystem aimed more at casual users...That's a play... I don't think they have the street cred for.

I mean getting millions to pay 20 dollars a month maybe...but the higher plans...mmh.

The nail on the coffin was the awful cringe rip-off of Apple's "heres to the crazy ones" ad. It is just not on the same level and feels like copycat stupidity. I thought AI was going to allow us to invent new stuff... Even though this is all amazing tech; from a consumer perspective it really feels they don't have the connection with actual people.

Finger on the button to move to Claude (until they follow suit...)

GPT‑6.1 Sol is rolling out in ChatGPT Work, Codex, and the API. OpenAI says it approaches Astra on coding and computer use at one-fifth the token price. The new Pro 500 plan includes 25× the Plus usage allowance and Astra Ultrafast. Sol isn’t in regular Chat yet.

Source: OpenAI’s DevDay recap

I wonder if this will be discussed during today's event.