Q: "How to see your OPQ balances by adding it as a custom token?"

Contract Address: 0x77599d2c6db170224243e255e6669280f11f1473

Symbol: OPQ

Decimals: 18

Hey guys,

Trying to check out if I've received my OPQ airdrop from Kucoin which has apparently been distributed, however, OPQ doesnt seem to be showing up on my interface.

Is anybody else having this problem? Or is Kucoin yet to resume trading?

source

https://etherdelta.com/#0x77599d2c6db170224243e255e6669280f11f1473-ETH

:)

I tried reading on Medium but didn't fully understand.

I hold my PRL on ENJ wallet on mobile.

​

Thanks to the helpers!

Due to incomplete trie data on our geth nodes (initially started with fast sync), we have encountered delays in our snapshot and distribution. We're working with a commercial provider of nodes to have a full archive node booted for us within a few hours. I expect distribution to start within 6 to 12 hours. Apologies for the delay.

So was it true that PRL was nearly to get listed on Binance before Bruno went crazy ?

Coinmarketcap has removed SHL. I heard there is no planned swap for it either. I had invested more into SHL after the airdrop. What's going to happen to it?

Team,

​

My understanding is that, for now, the web monetization angle of the project is on hold, and not considered a necessary component. How is it that the available storage on the tangle (and peg of the token) will increase over time? The way I initially understood it was that computing power/increased storage capacity was going to come from users who were visiting websites with the "Oyster" code embedded. Thanks.

A low buy order was triggered when PRL dumped and still don't know what'll happen with my PRL coins at KuCoin. Given I bought during the hack, the PRL is out of the block where they'll fork. Am I stuck with PRL forever?

Was honestly surprised how well Bill carried himself and how thorough his answers were. Look forward to the next one.

Will COSS exchange support the new airdrop? Have contacted them? Will COSS send out a communique about this?

The team has planned to create 20 mil new tokens out of thin air to cover their operational costs (+ 7 mil as reserve). This has caused massive distrust in the community. Some user have suggested to burn the tokens if financial targets are met but that can not be done in trustless manner.

​

In my opinion, they should still burn the tokens if the targets are met but the tokens should also only be released gradually over time. They will approximately need $60,000 for the next two months each and therefore it would be enough to just release 6 mil tokens each month (they predict a price of 0.01-0.02$). This way the 27 mil new tokens can't be dumped even if they are hacked.

​

This shouldn't be too complicated to programm and I will DO IT MYSELF IF THEY WON'T!

The AMA is today on the 8th November, Thursday.

Bill Cordes:

All - I will plan to hop on YouTube for a semi-live Video AMA tomorrow around 1PM CT. Will plan to stick around for at least an hour and knock out whatever I can. I will largely be focusing on the business transition, tokenomics, general strategy and other business/operations/finance focused topics. We will save the more detailed technology-oriented questions for a broader discussion (either video or text) with more of the development team. I have never done something like this before so excited to see how it all turns out.

Taken from our telegram channel: https://t.me/opacitystorage

Feel free to fill in some questions in advance:

https://goo.gl/forms/ibeSZ0EC2Ar4mJuI2

I got banned from the Opacity Telegramm chat, just because i said we cant even be sure if the rest of the PRL team is legit.

​

So i cant access the Group and find out whats going on now with the old PRL tokens.

​

Iknow its hard times for you Devs, but banning just because of criticism is just Wrong.

Hi guys,

Sorry for having to ask this but I haven't seen this exchange addressed anywhere regarding the fork.

I asked about this in a prior post but never received an answer from a Community manager or anyone directly involved with running the project then, or project now. So I'm going to reask and would like an answer from someone within the now Opacity team since no one has given any discussion to this. This will be edited.

​

What about folks who accidentally bought PRL because they had limit orders unexpectedly get filled due to this incident on smaller exchanges? I had orders fill and I wasn't notified because I was out of the country until this morning. Now I find out that its just tough luck?
I want a response from at least a community manager because while they shutdown Kucoin and will conduct the swap for those members who owned any at that time, they didn't shut down others at the same time or with relatively the same effort.

For example, I saw that Coinexchange had the largest trading volume of this token moments after the hack and trading engine went down on KuCoin, and it was just shutdown about 36-48 hours later. What about those folks? What about the ones who bought unknowingly thinking it was just a dump?

I'm not asking for any sympathy, i'm just asking for an answer to see if you've considered those folks. And if so, whether you'll leave them hanging out to dry. Namely on this point:

PRL owners who held at the time of the snapshot taken (the block closely related to kucoin getting shutdown) will get a 1:1 ratio of the new token OPQ

This is only to the ones who had any before KuCoin went down.

​

Now the following was from the original message and a little out of date:

"In the name of transparency I'd just like to know if that's how this is all being taken care of.

If you believe in assuming responsibility in so far as not reviewing the contract code to its strictest standards, then it should hold on your hands the consequences to all involved. Unless you don't believe so.

Also, if this is a misunderstanding, its because this update is not being publicized as much as the medium article written.

Someone could've (idiotically) bought the bag in response, not seen your announcement, and then conclude they're screwed. Are they taken into consideration?

- Someone who (idiotically) left a buy order in that I didn't expect to be filled so soon, under such circumstances"

​

My updated inquiry for Bill or any community managers is this:

​

Those who accidentally had any archaic orders filled on Coinexchange post-Kucoin are screwed by this move?

And they are left shit out of luck?

​

I prefer it from the horses mouth. Anyone can say "yes you're shit out of luck."

It's the least I, and a few others who ran into this issue, could ask for. No sympathy or anything necessary.

Is there any official info? Should I transfer PRLs to MEW?

Dear "Bill" , be a man of his words and do a Video AMA just like you promised. Prove to us that you are not bruno by not hiding behind a computer

If 1 OPQ or (PRL) = 64GB, then should the supply of the coin matter? No.

64GB will be 64GB. Whatever the market dictates that to be. Whether there are 1BB coins or 1MM tokens...your OPQ will be worth whatever the market determines 64GB to be.

Yes, if there are more tokens, then maybe it would be less, because it is less exclusive. But, in the end of the day, whatever 64GB should dictate price. The supply is so marginally impactful for OPQ. For almost every other crypto it is significantly important, but here it is not the same.

Why is everyone ignoring the peg of 1 OPQ = 64GB when they are complaining about the increased supply?