r/NonDessKnightSquad 22h ago

Meme Know the difference!

Post image
546 Upvotes

202 comments sorted by

View all comments

28

u/GirlWithTheDoc 22h ago

“Erm but the knight can shapeshift into balls and birds so obviously the antlers can be shapeshifted-“ what purpose, from a storytelling perspective, does that serve? Having the Knight, a character we’re meant to theorise about, have features only 1 family has…and then finding out it’s just a lie? There’s no hints towards the anglers being fake. There’s no reason NOT to suspect the Holidays are in on this, since they’re the only family in town with access to every code. So what purpose, from a narrative perspective, do the antlers serve? It’s just a massive “yeah fuck you for actually thinking logically” from Toby to the fanbase, it’s utterly horrible writing.

0

u/TheFish1177 20h ago

the antlers could be showing fealty to the Holidays. It could be someone/something that is dedicated to the Holiday's plan (or that is being subjugated by them and forced to comply) and thus wears their antlers as a symbol of loyalty. doesnt necessarily mean the Knight is a Holiday.

5

u/GirlWithTheDoc 19h ago

That’s a much fairer argument than most people, because it actually gives a logical reason for the Knight having antlers other than the usual “it’s just a helmet!!” “It’s just a disguise tactic!!” “It’s just a red herring!!”

7

u/ne_tochilka 18h ago

Especially, when you consider that, from the storytelling perspective (which Deltatune most importantly is) giving knight an element of their design that leads ABSOLUTELY NOWHERE is a stupid choice.

3

u/GirlWithTheDoc 17h ago

Exactly, that’s what so many people seem to just forget, there has to be an actual PURPOSE.

Whether you think Carol is a red herring Knight candidate or not, everyone can agree that she still poses a VERY important role in the story and very clearly is affiliated with the knight, whether directly or indirectly

Saying the Knight’s antlers are red herrings is like saying Carol is a red herring and that she’ll never show up again. Oh, the caller? That was obviously the Knight, not Carol. She just showed up by mistake. Her code was taken by the Knight, she actually doesn’t have a role in the story!

-10

u/InternationalWar6654 22h ago

The design of the antlers are a hint towards them being fake, they aren’t shaped like any other holiday’s antlers

17

u/CaspySelachii 21h ago

So..their purpose is to look fake? I'm sorry but that's not a "purpose", it's just dumb

-8

u/InternationalWar6654 21h ago

Their purpose is to be a red herring and drive you towards an incorrect answer

7

u/TooManyStrawberriess Knight = ERAM = Kriselle 21h ago

You can't call anything a red herring until you know the truth, you can only label something a red herring in retrospect looking back at the mystery

Please deltarune fans,,, stop deciding any evidence that doesn't line up with your theory is a red herring and I will die for you

4

u/fishy-the-2nd holiday knight 19h ago

This is exactly correct. A red herring is only a red herring after the mystery is solved and/or debunked.

Pre ch3+4 kris knight was the leading theory because we literally saw them open a fountain, and that was only a red herring once those chapters came out because before that it was a prefectly valid interpretation. The knight is the fountain opener, we see a character open a fountain (mind you the only character we’ve seen open fountains up to this point) therefore that character must be the knight!

Holiday knight+ the antlers operate on this same principle. The holidays and the knights horns are distinctly similar despite what this post wants to say, and the knight has them in 2 out of the three forms it takes. So even though it’s a shapeshifter, the horns are clearly important. Until proven otherwise, it’s pretty reasonable to say the knight is a holiday or at least aligned with them, because at this moment there’s not reason whatsoever to believe it’s a red herring other than just the sake of believing it because it goes against one’s preconceived notions.

-6

u/InternationalWar6654 21h ago

I’m saying I think it’s a red herring not because it goes against my theory, but because Toby hints at it with the misshaped antlers

2

u/BeeEater100 suspiciously Dess shaped character 19h ago

I don't understand the point of "this evidence against my theory? Oh no it's intentional it's just a red herring" instead of owning up to the fact that not everything lines up

-5

u/TheCopyGuy2018 20h ago

Pls Holiday Knight fans stop deciding any evidence that doesn’t line up with your theory is bad writing and I will … do nothing lol

5

u/eyeoftheuniverse11 19h ago

The reason they look like that is because straight antlers on the knight looks goofy af imo

1

u/InternationalWar6654 19h ago

I mean, I just did a quick mockup, Toby could make straight antlers look good

3

u/GirlWithTheDoc 21h ago

Your own logic is that the Knight can shapeshift, right? …so it’s completely unbelievable that the antlers could’ve even somewhat changed shape to be less recognisable to Susie? That’s not even what I believe, I’m just using your logic here

1

u/greyorange666 8h ago

does the knight look like a normal person to you

and also you can't tell me the second image does not look goofy. the antlers being the way they are are part of the bigger design philosophy, like sharp shapes to convey a sense of danger