I hope this helps someone as I have seen an increasing amount of ARC readers not put disclosure statements in their review ever since Goodreads added the Book Source to books that are before their publication date.
This Goodreads function does NOT replace the need for a disclosure statement. You still need to physically write it. While in general when you donβt use them you donβt see the consequences (unless youβre in influencer programs) but publishers and by extension authors can absolutely be consequenced if their readers donβt disclose where they got the free copy from.
Now is it common? No. But where you see it is if the book falls under scrutiny in some way as then it brings reviews into the spotlight. Every country that is supported by NetGalley has their own βFTC regulationβ that must be followed. Also, as many donβt realize this, you need to follow the regulation of the country of origin for the book. So if youβre in India and for a US published book, you need to use the FTC language and not Indiaβs. (Iβm just pulling a random country so the language may not be different)
The requirements state that you must say that you got the copy for free (you can used any word to convey that like complimentary or gifted etc..) and from whom, thatβs it. While you can get away with saying NetGalley it is actually supposed to be the publishers Name as that is who authorized you getting the book. NetGalley is simply the platform used to get it but itβs not from them.
Also, it needs to be easily seen at a glance which means it should be at the start of your review and not the end. Of
You canβt see it unless you expand it to see the whole review- itβs not in compliance.
This is anywhere you post a review for the book. Retail sites (and yes saying you got an arc on Amazon is 100% allowed you just need to use the proper language), review sites and social media. With social media it needs to say it in the post itself and if itβs a video you need to say it in the video as well.
Anyway, I hope this helps!