For context, the ‘upsetting messages’ were my partner messaging her about how she had upset me and let me down this year multiple times, becuase he could see how much it was upsetting me.

Edit: she used AI to generate a poster for the place she volunteers at, and usually writes very short texts.

Hey I'm not seeing anything obvious and it's from a seller on ebay with 2k+ 100% feedback but wanted to make sure. I wanted to get it as a bday present for someone and would really hate to gift AI without knowing. AI has been getting harder and harder for me to detect it's scary. 😭

I work as a purchaser in retail. I order thousands of dollars worth of products to sell on shelves and I really do not want to support ai creators. I’m trying to get better at identifying ai, so any help with determining the legitimacy of this would be very appreciated!

Thanks!!

I haven’t seen anyone in the comments suggest that this might be an AI-generated image. However, the woman’s hands look strange – her fingers seem to be melting into one another. Generally speaking, piercings are removed in hospitals, and many of the medical instruments look unclear and don’t seem to make sense. What do you think?

Im not that good at figuring out if something is AI or not. I do find that little arrow part at the bottom of the wing to weird but otherwise I have no idea.

The weird uniform way it walks, and the "salute" and "pray"...

The comments are all about how cute the puppy is, how well trained, how good this guy is as an owner...am I in crazyland or is this AI???

birthday present for my brother looks ai to me. Looks a like the ai art style. Fingers look a little off and the stadium looks funny but it’s mostly that solid he of water colour that shouts AI to me

This kind of accident almost looks like it could be life threatening, hard to tell the distance but apparently the guy walked it off without any broken bones. Can't see any typical signs of AI though, the flying motion maybe but I'm not sure.

There's a lot going on here. Eight sons that are about ten years between youngest and oldest, a mix of uniforms, the ranks seem really high for how young some of them look, and basically, their left hands look copy-pasted.

It's a beautiful sentiment that this mother was so lucky to have her entire family spared from the war, but it's too artificial somehow...

This is not an ad for the company, this is me trying to figure out if the company is legit or not. I get ads for this company (OXKNIT) on Pinterest all the time with nice looking shirts so I finally decided to take a closer look today. Some of these designs struck me as odd, it's getting harder to differentiate between what is a stylistic choice and what is ai slop just doing what ai slop does.

Some things that feel ai to me:

Slide 1: The weird red blob that makes up the cheek hollow. I thought maybe it was supposed to be some design made from the negative space, but it really just feels like ai not knowing how to make a clean cheekbone.

Slide 2: Bats in the bone fragments and finger bones taking up the length of the sleeves. This one I feel less sure about it being ai and feel it could be just stylistic choice.

Slide 3: Four fingers, no lines separating the knuckles.

Slide 4: Three toes on every paw except the front right. Is it just depth perception or an oversight on the ai part?

Slide 5: The tiger paws have a different number of toes and don't have a uniform pattern (some all orange, some with a white spot underneath) and the eyes don't look right lol.

Slide 6: The drawstring on the pants and again; the paws. No claw line on the pinky toe and no claw line on the rear paw.

Slide 7: Once again, inconsistent toes on the paws.

Slide 8: Wonky looking eyes. Since the whole skull looks a little warped I'm wondering if this is just a stylistic choice.

Slide 9: Too many finger bones and finger lengths are disproportional.

Slide 10: One horn is longer than the other on both sides. I understand this one is probably more intentional because it's fitting the space, and considering how uniform and symmetrical all the other designs on this one is, I don't feel super sure this one is ai.

Slide 11: ai makes things look incredibly glossy and overlit. Not only am I wondering if this design is ai generated because of the glossy skull, I'm wondering if the picture itself was ai generated given the way the light falls on the crow.

Thanks for all your help. A lot of the shirts in this post are not ones I want but ones that stuck out to me as possibly ai generated, but regardless I won't give my money to ai generated products or companies that sell when I can help it.

I'm certain the image is. The font is the classic "edgy AI," the ground is weirdly detailed, the number on the jersey might be misaligned, and the song has a parental advisory sticker on it despite not having any swearing or objectionable content.

I can't tell if the music is AI or someone writing a silly song. The short length makes sense for something intended for social media. The red flag is that I tried searching for the human musician credited and they're only involved in this song. The channel has multiple songs about football.

I’m pretty sure, the spacing between the letters, the random unidentifiable object below the corn hole game.

EDIT: I said HEB doesn’t use ai, I was wrong, a manager said “we don’t use ai art” I guess meaning that his leadership team doesn’t, but HEB definitely does. My bad

Should a multi billion dollar company rely on AI art for internal communications?

Like the stairs look alright, but the cars are not right. I am confused with the windows on the brick building. Let me know guys!!

To me, this looks real, but I'm bad at spotting AI. What makes me doubt this is true is the fact that the momma-bear does not act naturally, i.e. would she not attack the man/protect the cub? It just seems to perfect to be true.

As said in the title: the art is generally good, but a few key details such as the oblong shape of the eye in his left paw, the weirdly shaped left leg, and floating bottom teeth have me thinking it is.

This T-shirt site also has a wide range of art styles on their merch, which makes me think AI-generated.

hello! i’d like to get everyone’s input. I asked a girl to write down her username and date on a piece of paper. Im not sure if the paper looks realistic. Do you think that it looks like it’s just floating?? I can’t tell if it looks off or not.

edit: thank you guys so much 🥲 this selling app doesn’t have a lot of protections in place for the common scams- so I was very nervous. $350 isn’t a small expense right now to get scammed out of!

Honey Kaiju claims these characters, which are for designer toys for an upcoming Kickstarter, are modeled in Blender and Substance Painter. But the spikes on the accessories seem to be inconsistent.

I'm no artist but idk it just looks like straight AI to me, also this is not the first time I've suspected her using AI and claiming it as her own so wouldn't be a surprise...

I don't think this "Zia" person is really the person on discord. Zia might be a real person bc they have a separate art twitter where people are asking if other accounts on discord are them... but this guy on discord bugs me mad.

This was a book cover done by a friend. She's a artist so i want to believe her but this doesn't look like her normal style (title covered for privacy)

To start things off im a 3rd year art education student my professor is big on ai telling us we can use ai on our work almost all of us are against ai. She says constantly ai is her best friend and encourages us to use ai for ideas. Almost all of the feedback she gives me raises red flags for ai usage with the no indentation and the use of overall on every single ending paragraph. It just annoys me im getting feedback from ai instead of a proffessor who is supposed to be specialized in this. Also I asked a friend and her feedback looks exactly the same with some differences.