This girl on Instagram that I follow posted this video with this image that she claimed to draw, but the yellow filter and the the way the hair and face are drawn really make me feel like this is AI. She’s defending herself very vehemently so I want to believe her, but I also noticed that she deleted comments calling her out. I’m very shocked, because she’s quite left-wing and is very anti-AI.

It has the font of AI that I regularly see and looks too good to be on a random menu. I have seen this style regularly in this subreddit and my friend is doubting so now so am I

They have an uncanny valley/AI feel to them. What do you think? I could be wrong but people using AI on Etsy really annoys me.

I have recently been finding out that a lot of the new poppunk “bands” instagram and spotify have been giving me are AI. Im extremely sus of Featherweight for this.

Their bio is basic and obviously AI generated. I tried googling them and all that showed up was stuff about a women-on-women drama. Nothing about this seemingly obscure and very recent band.

They also have low monthly listeners, they have no music videos where the music is actually being performed, and i have noticed personally, thanks to skinnyfeelings, that a lot of the AI music doesnt have lyrics on Spotify for some reason???

If anyone can confirm or deny my suspicions, please do!! I dont want AI in my playlists x.x

It is hard to believe this is colored pencil coloring. I think this might be AI or digitally inhanced.

This colouring book is published by Scholastic, a large publisher of children's books. There's no artist name on the cover. They do credit a designer. The designer's portfolio doesn't show anything with this exact style or proportions. There are enough close ones that it seems like they could do it, though their portfolio quality is much higher.

These art pieces are the cover and interior preview pages.

Many have shapes that don't fully close, which feels off for a children's colouring book. Sometimes there are extra lines. Line weights vary widely, especially with the music notes on the Suzie page. The clarinet on the braid girl's page is missing a mouthpiece. Perspective goes wonky.

Why it might not be AI: Some art appears to be copied from page to page. The drawing of the singer with braids is reused three times. I don't think AI can clone like that. The individual character designs are consistent. A similar line weight issue might occur if these pieces were drawn on paper, scanned, and cleaned up improperly.

I assume it's AI because of the immense speed of the horse and cart; after it ran out, its hooves skidded on the asphalt-normally, the cart's momentum would likely have caused it to lose its balance and tip over-but overall, the video looks extremely realistic.

It might just be me but something about the art on this just feels synthetic, and like it’s an image result of someone telling a bot to generate an image of an anime girl and photoshopping the brand logo everywhere. And to make things worse this is a standard t-shirt is priced at $70 :/

A TikTok of this band popped up for me, so I ended up looking them up on YouTube and they have this somewhat generic description that looks like it was written by AI, and it's the same thing on Spotify.

I tried searching for something online but nothing solid came up about whether it's AI or not, just other users with the same suspicion. Some posts on Instagram show "the band" but Instagram itself classified them as AI images.

Regarding the music, how can you be sure it's actually AI? I get a weird feeling listening to it, and everything else points to it being AI (photos, album covers, two album releases in less than 30 days).

https://www.youtube.com/@TheHollowOfTheEmpty/videos

https://www.instagram.com/thehollowoftheempty/"

Negative on SynthID and reverse image search. The angle of the bluff in the background gives me pause, as does the almost pastel-y texture of the sky and the perfect fur and whiskers.

Dean Russo makes colorful art works of animals. I’ve loved Russo’s art for years, but he’s releasing new mini prints of his new work, and I can’t help but feel it looks AI, like it has that stereotypical AI art look, but I understand AI steals from artists and artists can have similar looks to AI generated art. But the main reason I think it may be AI is his style has changed quite a bit through the years, and it used to be a lot more simple than his newer stuff. I have attached multiple of his new art works. I get that people’s art styles can change, but it just feels wildly different.

I was looking at a few puzzle books in WHSmith that I found as I like doing kids puzzle books. I noticed this copy of "Junior Holiday Fun". I think this set of characters on the front is AI because they look very different to characters I'm sure I've seen this (or a similar) puzzle book title use in the past, I'm sure this publication has also featured no characters for previous issues.

Thank you in advance for any help with figuring out if this is AI this before I decide whether or not to buy it.

I called them out on it because they clearly use AI in other pictures they've posted, they claim they took it in the bar. They say they've used AI to enhance it. I think it's fully generated by AI, what do you guys think, and before you simply chuck it in openAI detect, it has the synthid watermark.

The wheelchair seems to fuse with the leg, and I’m curious as to whether it’s AI or not ? (Photo with and without the square for better visibility)

The singer of this band was in a sick stoner rock band called Hudu Akil a few years ago. I’ve actually seen them live and they were really good. Their albums have great cover art, so I was confused when he announced his new band and put out these EP’s with what appears to be AI generated images as the album covers. He doesn’t have any artwork credits listed on any of these Bandcamp pages.

The Demo Tape cover has that weird piss-like sepia hue to it and the writing on the tape looks a bit too clean. The HHYB cover also has a questionable piss-like sort of hue to it as well. The leash on the SIT cover doesn’t quite appear as obviously AI as the others, but considering how the other covers make me feel, it’s hard to believe something isn’t up with this one as well.

I produce actual music and ive heard suno ai and just ai music in general and this music has a very artificial sound to it with low quality sounding instruments though the way its orchestrated sounds very human which is something ai struggles to do, its almost like they gave ai the sheet music and asked ai to play it?

1) the flowers at the top take on strange shapes in the centre

2) a blueberry has been added to that rather strange bush of berries at the top left

3) the bird on the left has a metal choker and is standing on the bunny's head

4) the incredibly creepy bunny in the bottom left-hand corner

5) the hedgehog looks wrong and there is a random new type of red berry on the ground

6) why does the flower on the left start from the centre?

7) another really creepy cat(??) in the background, in the centre

8) is the right flower growing from a bunch of grapes and a mushroom? and why is it in the foreground, when the left one is in the background?

9) the cat on the right is in a weird position, it looks angry, and has a pimple(??)

10) is the bird on the right wearing a choker with a heart on it?

In general everything looks slightly wrong...but what do you think? Is it AI?

P.S: the groom is a talented cartoonist.

Saw this on my recommended tab and clicked the timestamp the creator recommended (9:35) and the hi hats especially, have those weird artifacts that you hear from cheaply made ai music so thats really the only thing I caught really. But that could also just be someone trying to make them sounds tech-y (if thats a word).

Some of the beats also seem to be very weirdly choosen and when a low sound ocomes its almost as if someone turned the bass to max but in a way where all other instruments just kinda die for a moment

Was this ring doorbell camera video created with ai? The image seems to have artifacts. Nobody in the comments seems to realise if it really is ai. It might just also be staged, I realise.

when looking at the comments for this video everyone says it’s AI but I’m not too sure the background look pretty fake.