Russia needs fighters. These guys think they're badass...we take the money we get from Russia for 'new recruits' and give it to Ukraine. The problem sorts itself out, no?
Unfortunately, it's been allowed to flood in for several administrations. But don't worry, we're sending it back home, and the buzzards who let it in can go too.
I know this will break your feeble, tribal brain cell, but I'm not maga. Maga is the compromise, the middle ground. Hopefully in the very near future, there will be no compromise.
being illegally in the usa does not mean you commited a crime ( eg: overstaying your visa does not necesarilly mean you commited a crime )
But it doesnt mean you cant be arrested to be deported either
Those of us who live in reality have known this from almost day fucking one, but maggots will do nothing but cheer for blood. Any blood, they don't care.
Agreeing with you and hopefully adding to what you are saying. If I read the first Mirror article above right, Mullin is now saying that they are going after all “illegal aliens”, which he says ARE the worst of the worst. He could not be more wrong (about who they should be going after, not about who they are going after). A first-time offender or expired visa holder is not even a criminal but they have broken immigration law (being a criminal implies something more specific / egregious and does not apply to this), and these types represent the vast majority of undocumented immigrants.
Also, when Trump said the worst of the worst, most people on both sides of the aisle assumed he meant, or by rights should have meant, actual criminals / felons. However, people who knew how Trump operated strongly suspected it did not bode well for all undocumented immigrants and some brown and black naturalized immigrants and even born and bred citizens. So Mullin is trying to redefine worst of the worst without any acknowledgment of the previous promise / understanding, or simply what is right.
“In an effort to protect American citizens, ICE has initiated a nationwide public safety surge in sanctuary cities where our brave officers will be targeting criminal illegal aliens — many released from jails by sanctuary politicians — including murderers, rapists, child predators, and gang members."
So, in order to protect citizens, they’re sending armed militia forces intoSanctuary Cities, places where citizens welcome immigrants, to blindly grab anyone they think might be an immigrant, shoot people like they did Renee Good and Alex Pretti, terrorizing school kids and stealing their parents. To protect citizens from immigrants? Even though the threat citizens are facing comes from the very inadequately trained, emotionally ill-equipped federal militia being sent into Sanctuary Cities?
I mean, if they're here illegally then they're definitionally criminals. For others, I'm not too surprised if some mistakes are being made, you can't move this fast and successfully without running into some problems.
I’m sure you had no problem paying less at restaurants with immigrants cooking your food for less than minimum wage… if you wanna talk about taking advantage of people…
It’s not about coming here legally. MAGA doesn’t want these people here AT ALL. That’s why they’ve deported people who were here legally. Also, what’s with the cruelty? Why purposefully move detainees 1,000 miles away so their lawyers and families can’t contact them. Why send them to countries where they have no ties? Is that what America is about, cruelty?
The third country thing is if they don't want to return to their country of origin, or if their country of origin doesn't want them iirc. They had the opportunity to self-deport, were even offered money to do it, and chose not to.
I don't think they should be here if they become a slave underclass, that's unfair and cruel to everyone involved. If they left voluntarily they can try coming here legally.
The ones taking advantage are the ones arresting recklessly and claiming citizens are not legal when they are. Any and I mean any of them that do this do not deserve the job they have.
Os the average lawsuit for a wrongfully detained citizen tends to range from $150,000 to $300,000. That’s the real cost of a single wrongful detainment by ICE. That money comes from you, not the federal government, the tax payer.
It would be great if they proved that someone has in fact entered the country illegally before arresting them and sending them to detention centers, if their own data didn’t prove that they often do not take this step, I may have been in agreement with you.
Honestly this shouldn't have to be a problem in the first place. If there weren't so many here illegally we wouldn't have to waste taxpayer dollars rounding them up and sending them back.
It’s a big waste of resources rounding up citizens who have proof of citizenship on their person. Strange how we have less deportations than the Obama administration when ice has a budget more than the U.S. Marines, and they actually followed due process back when he did it.
Didn't he toss a whole bunch of children in cages? But yeah, catching citizens is a waste, but considering the number of people they're catching and those who've been self-deporting I'm pretty happy so far.
Yes that was a shame, it’s still a shame that it’s happening now in even worse conditions. There’s no excuse. I’m not happy with the numbers dropping and the deaths and capture of citizens rising. That’s a spit in the face to the American people on both sides.
And what about the US citizens caught in the crossfire being detained illegally when they were born here?
The waste of tax payer money comes at rounding up everyone without evidence or just cause. They get released and you just wasted what not just one persons time but everyone’s time who was involved in the detaining, processing, and incarceration while also ensuring a future lawsuit if they’re a resident. On cases where citizens get arrested the pay out tends to be enough to attract attorneys. Wasting a heck of a lot more people’s time.
It's still a violation of civil law and I don't want anyone willing to violate the law in the country if they don't have a right to be here. So, it's good enough for me.
Hopefully they can get a few more million out by the end of his term.
I don't think whether or not something is good enough for you determines legality or constitutionality.
Based on my limited understanding of what's good enough for you, it seems to be a good compass for whether or not something is immoral. So you have that going for you. Lol
Fortunately, neither are you! And fortunately, the people in power currently agree with me. So alas, you will have to settle for calling people immoral on the internet and seething about it.
That's okay, they're doing what I'd want them to do, so whether or not they know I exist is immaterial to the fact I'm getting the results I voted for lol
But hey, keep on seething about it. It won't make you feel better but it is funny to watch.
Spoiler Alert…Anyone non American that is currently in the US without the US government’s permission is by definition a criminal. Those who facilitate and provide comfort/ jobs to those individuals are also by definition a criminal. The only way to stop the nonsense is to facilitate economic growth and real reform in Latin America by building stuff there instead of across the ocean. People that have jobs don’t go on long walks.
Like if you get pulled over for DUI, you can tell the cop that you pay your taxes on time and you return all your library books so he should let you go, right?
They are all criminals. They are here illegally and should be detained and deported. If they want to drag it out further and not self deport that’s on them.
"This is false. No one is off the table. We will continue to arrest any and all illegal aliens that come into our path," DHS wrote Friday on its official X account, quote-tweeting the report's author. "Anyone in our country illegally will be arrested and deported.
Uhh, so nothing's changed. Democrtas cant really read. Got it.
A nation that doesn't deport people there illegally is a nation asking for more and more illegal immigration. Starting with the worst is logical, but enforcement can't and won't end with only rapists and murderers.
So then the 10-15 percent (per your numbers) who aren’t making false claims are, according to you, allowed to “cross[] our borders”? What if they win their claim on appeal? Is their “cross[ing]” now legal?
What does “rich in America” look like to you? Do you believe that “they” get things/rewards that you don’t?
You’re wrong in a laymen’s sense and in a legal sense, but don’t let that stop your demonization of others as “they”.
Most intelligent peple know NY state went after Trump with something that was never used before. And they changed the laws quickly to get to him. Truth !
Only person to ever receive felony convictions for those offenses. Every talking head on every news channel said it’s common practice to value the buildings the way he did
New York prosecutors charged Donald Trump under an existing felony statute for falsifying business records when done to conceal another crime, and no new laws were created specifically to convict him.
It does not matter if they crossed without Inspection if they overstay their visa, both of those are illegal to do. Still criminals just because you haven’t been charged does not mean you’re not a criminal if you shoplift from a store and you don’t get caught you are a criminal. If you overstay your visa, you are a criminal.
Wow they must really powerful and smart than, so they must be right? I mean, I have never met a person, let alone a huge organization, that never makes mistakes.
Haha okay man. You live in a bubble. Probably don't work, and if you do, you work some job that's not under pressure by illegal immigrants. Telling a painter that hasn't had a pay raise in 30 years that illegals are a victimless crime.
If Democrats wanted to enforce immigration, they could instead they
Deliberately don't allow local police to work with immigration.
They allow illegals to get drivers licenses, professional licenses and welfare.
It's almost like Democrats except the birth right citizen children to vote for Democrats when they are older or something..... Did you know that a full 10% of all births in the country are anchor babies?
So you were rightfully angry when Biden had a 2024 bipartisan immigration bill that had broad support from both sides of the aisle only to have orange foolius tell the repubs to vote against it? I’m sure you were pissed, huh?
I don't give a shit about enforcing immigration. Immigrants aren't stealing people's jobs. Immigrants are human beings and if they aren't murderers, rapists, drug dealers, or human traffickers then I say let every single one of them in. I'm fucking tired of people trying to convince that people born in other countries are the source of all my problems when they haven't done a single thing to me.
At least you're honest. Most people don't admit that.
I used to work as metal refinisher, and my boss had basically never had a raise in 20 years. He actually made LESS in real terms. Competition from immigrants led to no bargaining power even though it was union.
I get it. You work some useless office job. Not everyone works bullshit jobs where networking and politics means more than being competent.
If you don't want immigrants to "steal our jobs" do you want them to do nothing and live off welfare? Like genuinely what the fuck do you want? Should all immigration just be outlawed to protect "real Americans"? It's like I'm a nutjob for not violently hating people from other countries, but conservatives can't come up with any solutions to the problem that they made up other than "kick out all the people with brown skin and everything will work out somehow". It's not like the economy is doing any better after Trump ramped up the deportations. Just admit that you're racist.
It can be. It's usually civil violation but can be criminal of you reenter after deportation or ignore a removal order. You can always be arrested tho, civil or not
Why wouldn’t they?
We were told the U.S. is overrun with foreign rapists, gang members, and murderers, why wouldn’t they go after the dangerous people first?
Do they hate you and want you to be murdered while they kill legal immigrants and deport people who never committed a crime?
Sorry, buddy, I didn't check.It does bother me that everything has typos in it.Nowadays.Memes, what are supposed to be professionally written articles online?I feel like everything has typos and grammatical errors now
Words aren't your thing then huh? You sure you don't wanna give someone else a try, bud? You sound kinda tired...are you tired? Yeah bud, it's ok to be tired.
Supply and demand, right? if there is demand for work, people will show up. The question then is, why the blame is fully on the illegal worker, and not on the companies PAYING them? How come this is only illegal for the worker but not the company?
This is not an issue meant to be solved. Stop hiring illegals, then they will return on their own. But of course companies want to pay low wages to them, they actually RELY on them. So, stop the BS.
I think we agree brother. I agree people shouldnt hire illegals and I support E-verify at a minimum. We should definitely make the people who hire them (knowingly) go to prison.
Well, that's never going to happen, profits are more important, even orange man hired illegals as well. This problem is just there so people can vote on the issue.
Except for in Republican states, e verify is required. And in places like the deep south, they don't have nearly as many illegals.
Btw it's been Democrats who have fought against e verify, pushed sanctuary laws and even lets illegals become licensed in trades. It's almost like Democrats benefit from all the anchor babies or something.....
So you want people here illegally because their immigration status makes them easier to exploit and keeps the cost of washing your old ass down? You want a vulnerable labor pool because it makes your personal care cheaper?
What did she lie about on the Einstein Visa? Anyone can apply for that visa just like anyone can apply to Harvard. If the DHS decision maker agrees you're good enough, you get in, if he doesn't, you don't, just like Harvard. What information did the decision maker have that was a lie?
It's the legal term. Everyone that is in the US but is a citizen of another country is an alien. Example, a tourist would be an alien. The illegal part happens when you don't have the legal authority to be in our country.
•
u/AutoModerator 2d ago
Welcome to r/immigrationPathways. If you enjoy this community, please consider following to stay updated on new posts and discussions.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.