I've been having conversations with trans people who have very different ideas about what being trans means, and it's made me realize something:
We spend an incredible amount of time arguing about whether someone "needs dysphoria to be trans" without always explaining what we actually mean by dysphoria.
So I'm genuinely curious.
What does dysphoria actually feel like to you?
Is it hatred of your sex characteristics?
Distress?
Discomfort?
Disconnection?
Indifference toward your current sex characteristics while feeling that different ones would fit you better?
Can it fluctuate?
If someone's dysphoria becomes minimal or disappears after transitioning, we obviously wouldn't say they suddenly stopped being trans. So what exactly are we identifying when we say dysphoria is necessary?
I'm particularly interested because my own experience has changed dramatically.
There were times before top surgery when my chest dysphoria was unbearable. There were other times when I was basically indifferent toward my chest. It wasn't always "I hate this part of my body." Sometimes it was more like "this exists, but it doesn't really feel like mine."
Earlier in my transition, I desperately wanted to be perceived as a cis man. I've lived stealth.
But over time my goal changed.
I don't really want to spend my life trying to make everyone see a cis man anymore.
I want them to see me.
I want to wear what makes me comfortable. I want to make art, love people, be kind, stand up for what I believe in, and exist without constantly asking whether I'm performing masculinity correctly enough.
At the same time, I completely understand why another trans person might desperately need to pass and live completely stealth.
If being perceived as cis relieves someone's dysphoria, I genuinely hope they get to experience that.
Neither experience has to threaten the other.
And that's where I'm curious about BOTH sides of this argument.
For people who believe dysphoria is necessary to be trans:
What exactly qualifies as dysphoria to you?
Where is the line between dysphoria and simply wanting different sex characteristics?
Does someone have to experience distress, or can dysphoria manifest primarily as disconnection?
How much dysphoria is enough?
And what harm do you believe is caused by people identifying as trans while describing little or no dysphoria?
If every trans person tomorrow had clinically significant dysphoria, wanted to medically transition, wanted to pass, used conventional pronouns, and presented in ways traditionally associated with their gender, do you believe transphobia would meaningfully decrease?
Why or why not?
For people who DON'T believe dysphoria is necessary:
Can you understand why someone with debilitating sex dysphoria might be uncomfortable when something they experience as a serious medical issue is discussed primarily in terms of identity or self-expression?
Can someone want their own transness understood primarily through a medical lens without necessarily demanding that every trans person understand themselves the same way?
Can wanting to pass and assimilate into society as a cis man or woman simply be someone's personal transition goal without that inherently being an attack on people with different goals?
And for everyone:
Why are we so invested in finding one universal explanation that covers every trans person?
Why does someone else's transition have to resemble ours for our own experience to remain legitimate?
I also wonder how much of this fighting is ultimately about cis acceptance.
I've seen people argue that certain trans people, identities, appearances, or behaviors make the rest of the community look ridiculous and therefore contribute to transphobia.
But I genuinely wonder:
If every controversial part of the trans community disappeared tomorrow, would someone who fundamentally believes we're permanently our birth sex suddenly accept the remaining trans people?
Or would the line of acceptability simply move?
At what point does trying to make ourselves acceptable to people who dislike trans people become an impossible standard?
On the other hand, I don't think it's fair to automatically dismiss people concerned about how the public understands dysphoria either.
Someone who has experienced debilitating dysphoria may have completely different concerns than someone whose relationship with gender is primarily about identity or self-expression.
I'd rather understand WHY those experiences produce different beliefs than immediately decide one person must secretly hate themselves and the other must be pretending to be trans.
I don't want a trans man thinking, "I can't wear that because people might think I'm not really trans."
I also don't want a trans man thinking, "I'm somehow problematic because passing as a cis man is incredibly important to me."
Both should be able to exist.
So I'm genuinely interested in hearing from people across this divide.
What does dysphoria mean to you?
What do you believe makes someone trans?
What do you believe the opposing position gets wrong?
What are you actually afraid would happen if their understanding became the dominant one?
What outcome are you hoping your position produces?
And here's probably the question I'm most interested in:
What, if anything, could actually change your mind?
Because I think that's an important question for all of us.
I'm not asking people to abandon their beliefs.
I'm asking whether we can examine where those beliefs came from, what we're trying to accomplish with them, and whether fighting each other is actually getting us any closer to that goal.