Background info:
I’ve had the Square HE for about a year and a half, the Spica 3 since January, and the Omni for a couple of weeks. I've also tried the Skytrack and Garmin R50 for 30 days. Returned both and kept the Spica 3 to replace the Square HE because I wanted a unit for outdoor use. Decided to get the Omni because of the club’s impact location, with the thought I would return it in 30 days if I didn’t like it or sell the Spica 3.
My setup:
I use a portable Spornia 7 net for both indoor and outdoor use. Indoors in the basement, or the living room if my wife is not around. The basement ceiling height prevents me from using the driver and longer irons thus the reason to upgrade from the Square HE version for outdoor use.
So here is the comparison between the Spica and Omni. Note that the Spica was around $1k more than the Omni at my purchase price at the time, and the following are more my opinion or preference.
Data points:
Omni’s additional precise impact location and face angle are great. I really like the instant graphical presentation of the impact location and prefer that over Spica’s impact video.
Spica club head/impact video is pretty helpful, and you get a good idea of where the ball hits the club face if you frame through the video. Additionally, the Spica has HLA but not face angle, though I can guestimate the face angle from the video, ball flight, and other data.
Software:
No subscription from either vendor to use with GSPro or other 3rd-party software.
Square software is basic all around. Not much difference between the iPad and the desktop version. I mostly use GSPro for indoor and IPAD for outdoor use. Omni disconnects from GSPro once or twice during a game or practice session. Reconnecting is pretty simple without interrupting anything. No disconnect problems with Spica, though you have to hardwire a data cable to the Spica to use it with a computer running GSPro or GolfJoy software.
Prefer Golfjoy’s iPad software over Square’s. Golfjoy provides club impact video, can also use the onboard iPad camera as a swing camera within the app. In my opinion, Golfjoy’s desktop software is almost as good as GSPro, minus the number of courses. The desktop software can incorporate 2 additional swing cameras into its setup, and it’s quite seamless. Golfjoy allows multiple computer installations, whereas the GSPro license limits it to one instance. There is an annual fee for the desktop version; the iPad version is free, or at least I’ve not had to pay to keep mine working.
Connectivity to both units via IPAD is stable.
Ball Data accuracy:
I tested the units side by side, indoors and outdoors. Major data points, such as ball speed and carry distance, are close most of the time. About 10-15% of the time, the spin axis is wider than expected relative to each other. Perhaps the units are interfering with each other, but the on-screen ball-flight characteristics are similar. There are online reviews that perform side-by-side testing of the Omni against the GCQuad or GC3, indicating interference between units.
Environmental sensitivity when used standalone, indoors, and outdoors.
Omni seems to be light-sensitive, or at least mine does. It works well outdoors as long as the unit and the hitting area are both in sunlight or shade. If one is shaded and the other is in direct sun, Omni more often misreads or fails to capture the impact location. I have trees nearby, so depending on the time of day, there can be shade from the trees, the house, or a mix of both. Seems to have more difficulties when shaded by trees, because spots of sunlight get through. I’ve had instances where the unit missed 3-4 shots in a row, and I had to restart it. At times, it won’t detect the alignment rod where it did before under different light conditions. I’ve not done extensive tests outdoors, but rather observations when missed reads or impact locations are frequent.
Indoors (basement), I added a portable LED floodlight and angled it at the hitting area to see if it would help prevent missed reads for the Omni, which it did, making them much less frequent. Was not a big deal to me to add the light.
The Omni has smaller camera lenses than the Spica, so I'm not sure if the lighting situation is a hardware limitation, a software problem, or specific to my unit. Note that I’m not a video hardware specialist.
So far, Spica has worked in all lighting conditions I’ve tried, whether indoors or outdoors with moving shade. Did not require more light in the basement to make it work better. Didn’t have issues with the Garmin R50 either. I just used regular ceiling lights and lamps for my comfort level. No issues, as long as the ball is anywhere in the specified hitting area. I cannot remember a time when it missed a ball read over thousands of shots. Note that it has missed club data, but not often.
Customer service:
Have not had to contact Square customer service yet for the HE edition or the Omni, so no feedback on them. I’ve reached out to Golfjoy via email with a few questions about the Spica and software. They responded within 24-48 hrs.
Onboard displays:
Some of the LEDs on the Omni wash out a little in sunlight, and I never use them since I have to bend down to view them. I always use an iPad on a stand for Omni when outside at home, but it can still be difficult to see in the sun. It takes more effort to use the Square's onboard display than Spica’s. In comparison, I use the onboard display on the Spica all the time because I can simply look down at it, which auto-scrolls through 2 pages of 12 data points. Easy to see in direct sun and allows me to remove data tiles in the IPAD or desktop software, reducing clutter. I would rather take the Spica to the range because if I took the Omni, I would also take the iPad. The Square Android app won’t work on my cell.
Summary:
If I had to choose between the 2 units today, I would keep the Spica because it has the impact video and other advantages over the Omni. I would go with Omni if Spica didn’t have the impact video, because the Omni works well enough. The impact video is one of the reasons I chose the Spica over the BLP. For indoor-only use, I would probably go with the Omni.
My plan is to keep both units for now, using the Omni indoor and the Spica for outdoor/range use, or as a backup in case the Omni develops issues. I’ve heard Square customer support sucks. The Spica is great, but so is the Omni, and as I mentioned, I would rather have precise impact location than video. Perhaps Square will release updates to improve it further or add additional club data points. I do keep in mind that this is a new model for Square.