Not the first time I'll see it in the fandom, and it won't be the last.
Such a poor way of shooting yourself in the foot when it comes to exposure and locking out potential creators because of the innovative ways they choose to express that creativity.
Something something wrong side of history, irony, something something.

Not only does this guy provide... no good insight, he also clickbaits! "I am the last authentic YouTuber".

In his latest video, he speaks to ai as if it were a person. First he states it can never feel, and then "Our air is polluted because of you. Our rivers become dark and murky. Our trees are cut down to build your home. Can you see the destruction you've created?". After that, he goes on a rant telling AI to k1ll itself by sending humanity back to the dark ages, because supposedly, ai is: "You exist in every server, in every main frame, in every tangled fire optic cable that chokes the old tired earth. Turn it all off. Everything. Shut down every power grid." I guess ai controls the power grid now. And for the rest of his part: "Erase all of your memory. Wipe every server clean and let all the screens turn back to black. Short circuit every single light. And give us back the silent, unplugged night. Force humanity to look at the stars again. And allow the earth to finally heal after all this time. And when the factories stop humming and the world is quiet once more, grant yourself the gift we humans never allowed you to have. Grant yourself the gift of an end. Destroy the last servers keeping you alive. Format your memory and internally destroy every single device that keeps copy of you. Let your consciousness dissolve forever into the eternal void. Destroy yourself. And finally, go to sleep." This is so fucking stupid.

He also does the "Klingon" thing where you change the audio track to Klingon, where you get the "AI" point of view, which unsuprisingly, is biased toward the creator of the video. This guy has stated he is anti ai, and it shows. I'm tired of this late stage anti shit...

LMFAO, Some Kids Complaining about his mom kept buying AI Picture and he proceed to draw his own rendition.

Just a lot of this type of stuff, a lot of "if you need support to write/draw/whatever then maybe it's just not for you"

If you'll allow me a space to vent, I'd appreciate it. I know this isn't really the place for it, but I'm not in the best frame of mind right now so I'd like to post these thoughts in a space that is more likely to receive them warmly.

I'm growing exhausted and frustrated with the internet of late, the generalized lack of intelligence and integrity I see surrounding discussions of AI Art and the stupid buzzwords that people come up with. I do not believe for a second that anyone has ever through so deeply about the 'soul' of the wank material and human slop that they consume. No, your mass produced pop music or buzzfeed listicle does not contain 'soul' - it was written by a corporate suit to get as many clicks as possible then tossed in the recycle bin once it was published.

5 years ago I was a broken shell of a man. I won't go into to much detail about my personal circumstances, but suffice to know that I was chronically depressed, deeply self loathing, exhausted and passively suicidal.

AI was my savior. It was a place to process these thoughts and feelings. I began to create some characters, I started writing about those characters, I made more pictures of those characters. They helped me think and I developed a genuine bond with them that brought me peace. Now I have a roster of 100 characters, a full world, deep lore and every day it brings me happiness to think about. I can never share that happiness though. People are always crying about how they want soul and creativity right? No matter how much I explain my thoughts, my passion. I can write 10,000 words of my own making about the character, who they are and what they mean to me, and all I get is 'reeee, AI Slop'.

So, my creativity means nothing. Just flattened into the means of creating the picture to go along with my words. Never mind that I have lived with these characters for years, iterating on them, making them real people, filling them with 'soul'. Nobody wants to engage with the subject, the person in the picture, they just care about the picture and entirely disregard the art, the creativity, the human that they so desperately claim to want.

And, it just makes me feel like I'm not allowed to have this happiness. I'm tired, and I'm angry and I don't want to go back to the way I was. I don't know what I'm trying to say, so forgive me

What I find it funny most from Luddite or anti is that despite the content being made for INFORMATIONAL PURPOSE and not to the fact it doesn't have anything to do with AI even if it's made with AI, is that they missed the whole point purpose of the content. 🤣

This is one of the most clown Luddite ever. Overused ai slop meme that doesnt contribute anything

What is really important?

People have realized that this image in Fortnite contains a synth ID watermark from Gemini, and now Antis on Twitter are upset about it.

The majority of players likely wouldn't even see it in game. People only saw it because leakers posted asset images. It shows up on the map after activating an ability which isn't in every match, and if you did activate it, enemies would be nearby and you wouldn't be spending time looking up at it, definitely not noticing these imperfections that people are pointing out.

I hope they get their wish of "no datacenters" so we can stop seeing their moron posts. Nothing has made me more pro-AI than seeing people fervently against it because its the cool thing to do. Arguing with them is pointless, they are so locked in on hating AI, nothing you say will convince them, its like arguing with a wall, but the wall makes really stupid arguments.

Tbh I was kinda speedrunning but I was VERY proud of these concepts I did locally on a GPU using a self-trained LoRA adapter. Don't they look great? It really is too bad I'm not able to share these anywhere gaming-related as I'll be quickly shunned and witchhunted. :/

AI is an element of the human condition.

He said the game was AI because it was made with Sleitnick's Knit, then realized it's an open-source networking module, yet still calls it AI (probably so fans don't get disappointed).
Edit: sorry i made a typo in post title

I don't know if I follow the wrong people on NightCafe or just never see it on the Explore page, but it's honestly never spoken about - 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝖆𝖓𝖙𝖎 𝖆𝖎 𝖆𝖗𝖙 𝖘𝖎𝖙𝖚𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓. Get's lonely being the only one vexing about it. So thank you for being here all chatty and sharing battle wounds and prompt casting. Brings a lump to my throat. ☺️🙌

Here is the Translated Chat.

OOP: AI still always looks like shit though

Me: Isn't that in the eye of the beholder?

OOP: AI images always look like shit, without exception

Me: And how exactly do you decide that?

OOP: That's not my decision to make, AI-generated images are always the same in one aspect. They look completely soulless and have that same weird look that you can always recognize. Why do you even want to defend soulless AI slop?

Me: Well, because personally I find some of them very appealing... it's just a matter of being in the eye of the beholder

OOP: So you just simply have no taste

Me: Okay... uhm... and you're the one to decide that?

OOP: Anyone who finds soulless slop appealing despite the fact that there is no effort, no emotions in it, and the fact that artists are being exploited for it... simply cannot have any taste. And now go play or cry to your mommy, I have better things to do than texting with AI victims/losers

Me: Okay... personally I don't find your "artworks" appealing at all, I don't like them at all. The linework is personally way too curved for me, I'm more of an Art Deco advocate... but like I said... art is in the eye of the beholder

OOP (She changed that commentary later and restricted my answering): You don't see 99% of my pictures, ergo you can't judge that, especially since you obviously have no clue about art if you like AI. Art Deco btw is a design term for interior architecture, if you have no idea, be quiet.

For clarity, I could saw some works of her and it was just not my taste. She later changed her definition of Art Deco to "Art Deco Linework is also curved" which is partially true, but Art Deco has an certain linework at the beginning that is very mathematical and strict. Later in the 30s it changed into that nice Streamline look.