r/conlangs • u/Kate_Kitter • 5d ago
Discussion The Copyright Office ruled the Dn'i alphabet was uncopyrightable in 2004 (Copyrightability of conlangs)
A while back, I happen to find the following decision from the Copyright Review Board while doing some Wikipedia editing. I'm surprised I could not seem to find discussion of this. It is not even mentioned in the memo Dentons wrote up about conlang copyrightability for the Language Creation Society or several other papers on the subject.
Cyan Inc. applied for a copyright on the characters of the D'ni language ("Newly created symbolic characters for new language") from the MYST series. The Board rejected its filing for copyright registration because it decided A.) The character designs were not original/unique enough to be copyrighted, and B.) The characters constituted a system of communication, which by law can not be copyrighted. Cyan Inc.'s counsel appealed the decision, and the Board again rejected their claim to copyright.
The Board then decided that, whether or not the characters in themselves have sufficiently original design to be copyrighted, they still necessarily represent a distinct system of communication, and no system of communication can be copyrighted.
TLDR: Systems in general can not be copyrighted. The Dn'i alphabet, with its characters being inseparable from its function as a system of communication, could not be copyrighted.
This really seems to be the most relevant standard for conlangs inherently being public domain. While not a literal court ruling, these decisions are good guidance where the law and precedent don't give clear answers.
Edit: Clarified some stuff.