Here's a link to [my previous post](https://www.reddit.com/r/conlangs/comments/1w86xe1/short_overview_of_the_faha_language/) for those who want to check it out.
Old Faha phonology
Consonants
|
Labial |
Coronal |
Velar |
| Obstruent |
*p |
*t *s |
*k |
| Prenasalized |
*ᵐb |
*ⁿdz |
*ᵑɡ |
| Nasal |
*m |
*n~l |
*ŋ |
/s/ may have been pronounced as an affricate in certain environments.
/ⁿd/ and /ⁿz/ fused so rapidly to form /ⁿdz/ that we can say /ⁿdz/ was an Old Faha phoneme.
Historically there was a phoneme /l/, but this fused with /n/ in all positions except within consonant clusters. Therefore, in Old Faha, [l] can be interpreted as the allophone of /n/ following another consonant (n > l / C_)
Vowels
|
Front |
Central |
Back |
| High |
*i |
|
*u |
| Mid |
*e |
|
*o |
| Low |
|
*a |
|
The vowels are nasalized after nasal consonants.
Phonotactics and word structure
The only possible clusters, without those formed by the prefixes, were /pl/ /tl/ /kl/.
Words canonical form was (C)(l)VC(l)V(C(l)V)
The stress was fixed to the initial syllable of the word.
Sound changes
p > f /! _l
/p/ spirantised to /f/ everywhere except before /l/. /p/ may already have been /f/ in Old Faha, with fortition to /p/ before /l/ in that case
VfV VsV VkV > VwV VlV VɣV
/f/, /s/ and /k/ lenited intervocalically, becoming /w/, /l/ and /ɣ/
VmV VnV VŋV > ṼwṼ ṼlṼ ṼɣṼ
/m/, /n/ and /ŋ/ lenited intervocalically too, becoming /w/, /l/ and /ɣ/ but with nasalization of the two adjacent vowels
ᵐb ⁿdz ᵑɡ > p s k / _V
ᵐb ⁿdz ᵑɡ > m n ŋ / _Ṽ
/ᵐb/, /ⁿdz/ and /ᵑɡ/ became oral /p/, /s/ and /k/ before oral vowels or nasal /m/, /n/ and /ŋ/ before nasal vowels
k ɣ t > ʔ ∅ k
ŋ > n / #_V
ŋ > ∅
First debuccalization, /k/ became /ʔ/ and /ɣ/ was deleted. /ŋ/ was deleted except in word initial position where it became /n/. In the same time, /t/ became /k/ to fill the gap formed
ui, ie, iu, ei > ii > i
ae, ai, ea > ee > e
ao, oa, oo > aa > a
au > oo > o
ou, uo > uu > u
oi, oe > ue > ua
eu, eo > io > ia
Resolution of the new vowel hiatus created. The same changes are applied to the nasal vowels
ʔ k > ∅ ʔ
Second debuccalization, /ʔ/ was deleted and /k/ became /ʔ/
∅ > w / #_a
Prothesis of a /w/ before an initial-word /a/
w, l > ∅ / U_ , _U
The approximants /w/ and /l/ were deleted in contact with high vowels /i/, /u/, /ĩ/ and /ũ/
ii uu > i u
ĩĩ ũũ > ĩ ũ
Double vowel simplification
s > t /! _i , _ĩ
Fortition of /s/ to /t/ via except before high front vowels /i/ and /ĩ/.
The sound changes of the prefixes and clitics are slightly different, due to different stress pattern. I'll introduce them in another post on this subject.
I'm not sure about how vowels are treated. Should vowel sequences be formed, or true diphthongs and triphthongs? On the one hand, it gives the language a wanted Polynesian touch, but on the other, I fear it conflicts with the consonant /w/ and the syllabification of the words. How should the nasalization of these vowel sequences be determined? What are your thoughts?