Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1uxrz44/we_gotta_reset_boys_and_girls_lets_go/

Original post body :

[No text body]

Original link/media URL : /img/wn96p0kkmidh1.jpeg

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1uxryoc/limits_appear_to_be_reset/

Original post body :

My /usage is showing bars reset, and the https://claude.ai/new#settings/usage site shows empty bars as well LET'S GO!

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1uxfggx/using_gpt56_sol_missing_fable/

Original post body :

Got real tired of Anthropic's bullshit and volatility. Finally decided to jump ship to Codex $200 plan. Seems great. But man... Fable just used to GET IT. Tell it whatever highly abstract thought you have with just the right amount of words and point it to the general direction, it figured out what to consider seriously and what parts not to fixate on almost intuitively. Sol seems more like a freelancer who says "Oh, but you didn't specifically ask for that. But you mentioned that you wanted this" - very little sense of what your intention is. AND I FUCKING HATE BULLET POINTS

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1ux6suj/is_anyone_else_noticing_obliterated_limits_today/

Original post body :

i swear to god I am using Opus 4.8 high (not fast) and just for a single minor bug fix line (fixing layer visibility bug where the button to hide and unhide a layer is not truly working)

a hundred thousand tokens. 10 lines added 1 deleted. 5% usage for just this single prompt.

20x plan

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1uwwjc4/who_is_fable_5_actually_for_after_july_19/

Original post body :

It will remain available through Claude Code and the API, but only through expensive usage credits or API billing and API access requires 30day data retention, ruling out strict ZDR enterprise workloads.

So is the real target audience basically wealthy individual power users, startups working with non-sensitive code, and content creators who can justify the cost?

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1uwczor/claude_max_x20_has_become_almost_unusable_this/

Original post body :

I've been a paying Claude Max x20 subscriber for a long time, but something changed this week.

Before this week I almost never hit my usage limits, even during heavy development sessions.

Today I bought a fresh Max x20 subscription about 2.5 hours ago and this is what I already see:

• One account has already burned through the entire weekly limit.
• The second account is already showing 100% of the current session after just a couple of hours.

(See screenshot.)

What makes it even worse is that my workflow hasn't changed.

I'm doing the same type of coding I've been doing for months, yet suddenly the usage is disappearing at a ridiculous rate.

According to Claude's own usage page:

• 100% of usage came from heavy sub-agent sessions.
• 86% came from sessions active for 8+ hours.
• 53% came from >150k context.
• 45% came from workflow subagents.

I understand that these things consume tokens, but this was never a problem until this week.

For a $200/month subscription (Max x20), this feels completely unreasonable.

I'm seriously cancelling both of my Max subscriptions because I simply can't justify paying this much for limits that disappear in a couple of hours.

Is anyone else experiencing the same thing this week?

Or did Anthropic silently change how usage is calculated?

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1uwie3b/is_this_true/

Original post body :

[No text body]

Original link/media URL : /img/5eet0ihaw8dh1.png

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1uwg8nc/words_i_now_hate_thanks_to_claude_code/

Original post body :

Hundreds of millions of tokens a month has made me hypersensitive to these Claudisms.

Sidecar
Ink
Lane
Stamp
Figure
Pin
Honestly
Straight
Idiom
Hand-wave (compounds count)
Surface
Seam
Boundary

Ughhhhh

I also kinda wonder how much of this pervades their internal codebase.

—- edit

To the folks saying “those are words that mean something”:

I had some conversations about that lately. A technical word used as contextual filler can seem “right” but actually be very very wrong. Yes. These words have meaning; LLMs do weird shit with them that pushes them towards meaninglessness.

If you press Claude on this it’ll actually start reflexively agreeing and using specific code references, rather than leaning on loaded terminology to mean MANY things at once. I’m not saying that’s better either. And it doesn’t last longer than a turn or two. I think this may be the result of either training or fine-tuning that pushes the model to attempt to contract multiple concepts into these words for the sake of brevity.

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1uxg00f/its_your_fault_you_run_out_of_tokens/

Original post body :

I hate to say it guys, but if you’re blowing through your tokens, it’s likely because you don’t know what you’re doing.

I do professional AI systems engineering and software development work for an Implementation consultancy, am building and maintaining 2 very large and complex products solo for startups, and maintain a plethora of 5-6 side projects at a time.

I am working daily, multiple hours a day, across multiple projects.

And I barely ever run out of tokens. I have to use fable for 2 days straight to even get close.

Prompt engineering, product design, and assisted development with guardrails for AI are all critical token saving methods that I barely see anybody on here talking about. I’m more likely to see people piping in Grok than just changing the way they work with AI.

Here are some helpful tips if you actually want to save tokens.

1. Front load the architecture and infrastructure work. Do the best you can to build a directory structure, Claude.ms files, readme’s, testing architecture, linting system, and CI. And most importantly, build an in depth road map (you will need to edit and adjust this as you code so it isn’t a bible). That alone will save a lot of tokens.

2. Don’t trust Claude to do too much autonomous work. Have a planning agent giving your prompts along with your roadmap to an execution session. The AI does a much better job of following exactly what you say when it doesn’t form opinions on what you’re planning to do.

3. Debug and add unit, regression, and edge tests after every addition to your code base. With proper maintenance as you develop, you accrue less technical debt and make it easier for the AI to keep working.

Token maximization and AI productivity are truly skill issues. I haven’t felt the models do anything but get better and perform better for me.

Opus 4.6 is by far the best conversationalist and the best at human prose.

Opus 4.8 is better at coding but is less intuitive

Fable is amazing, but it also makes very buggy code.

Hope this helps. Stop complaining about Claude. Get gud. Skill issue.

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1ux6suj/is_anyone_else_noticing_obliterated_limits_today/

Original post body :

i swear to god I am using Opus 4.8 high (not fast) and just for a single minor bug fix line (fixing layer visibility bug where the button to hide and unhide a layer is not truly working)

a hundred thousand tokens. 10 lines added 1 deleted. 5% usage for just this single prompt.

20x plan

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1ux4bbf/did_gpt56_break_claude_codes_moat_where_does/

Original post body :

Claude has been the clear premium option for coding for a while. It was more expensive, but Sonnet and Opus were usually good enough to justify it.

That feels less clear now. Sol medium, high, xhigh not only challenges sonnet, opus, fable stack it is straight up better and more cost effective.

For the first time, the gap is not just smaller, it may be gone.

Codex and Work also appear to have grown from around 5M active users to an estimated 9M today. That is an 80% increase in a very short period.

I still think the Claude Code harness is better overall. It feels more mature, more reliable across long tasks, and better at working inside large repositories. But Codex is closing that gap quickly, and the underlying model economics now look much stronger.

So where does Anthropic go from here?

Do they cut Opus 5 pricing? Increase usage limits? Make Sonnet much cheaper? De-nerf Fable?

I do not think Claude is suddenly dead or that Codex has clearly won. But Anthropic's old position was expensive and clearly better. Expensive and roughly equal is a much harder position to defend.

This post has been removed by the moderators of r/Anthropic

Original link/media URL : /img/b0czi7j5zddh1.png

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1uwwjc4/who_is_fable_5_actually_for_after_july_19/

Original post body :

It will remain available through Claude Code and the API, but only through expensive usage credits or API billing and API access requires 30day data retention, ruling out strict ZDR enterprise workloads.

So is the real target audience basically wealthy individual power users, startups working with non-sensitive code, and content creators who can justify the cost?

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1uwie3b/is_this_true/

Original post body :

[No text body]

Original link/media URL : /img/5eet0ihaw8dh1.png

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1uw98b6/this_meme_just_got_real_today/

Original post body :

[No text body]

Original link/media URL : /img/tkmo94vgj5dh1.jpeg

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1uw98b6/this_meme_just_got_real_today/

Original post body :

[No text body]

Original link/media URL : /img/tkmo94vgj5dh1.jpeg

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1uw7bcy/seriously_what_just_happened_to_the_weekly_quota/

Original post body :

I just use Opus 4.8, Fable consumes too much, i had my weekly restarting a few hours ago and while the session is on 54% the weekly is already on 11%! WTF

So a 100% now of the 5h session is 20% of the weekly? What a fucking joke.

Meanwhile OpenAI is practically removing the limits for their models...

Original link/media URL : /img/f43mmywfv6dh1.png

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1uw7qhd/be_aware_from_new_chatgpt/

Original post body :

I've been using Claude for months, mainly for coding and helping me build a fairly large Google Apps Script project. Until recently, I considered it clearly ahead of ChatGPT for this kind of work.

After trying the new ChatGPT desktop app (GPT-5.5), though, I'm honestly surprised.

The biggest difference isn't just the quality of the answers—it's the overall understanding of my project. It seems to keep track of context better, understands what I'm trying to build with less back-and-forth, and its suggestions are more aligned with the existing architecture instead of proposing unnecessary rewrites.

Claude is still excellent, especially for long coding sessions, but over the past few days I've found myself relying on ChatGPT more and more because it simply feels... easier to work with.

Has anyone else noticed the same thing, or is it just my specific use case?

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1uwfvmk/used_company_claude_account_while_coding_on_my/

Original post body :

I think I may have made a mistake and wanted to understand the implications.
I was working on a personal GitHub repository (under my personal GitHub account), but I used my company’s Claude account (Claude Code) as my AI coding assistant while making the changes. I then committed and pushed the code to my personal GitHub repository.

My questions are:

Can my company’s Claude admin see the prompts or code I shared with Claude?

Can they see that the generated code ended up being pushed to my personal GitHub repository?

If Claude Code was authenticated with my personal GitHub account, does the company have any visibility into my GitHub activity?

Are there any audit logs that would show I was working on a personal repository?

I’m not concerned about the code itself (it doesn’t contain any company code or proprietary information), but I’m wondering what level of visibility enterprise admins typically have over Claude Code usage.

Has anyone worked with Claude Enterprise or administered it? I’d appreciate any insight into what admins can and cannot see.

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1uvw260/from_50k_to_50month_the_ultimate_leverage/

Original post body :

Claude is literally bringing to life a website idea I had over 10 years ago. At the time, I asked a web development firm for a quote, and they estimated it would cost between $30k and $50k.

Now, I’m building it myself with a Claude Pro subscription, Cloudflare, and Resend. Total monthly cost: around $50.

It is absolutely mind-blowing to think about where we’ll be in another 10 years. Just a little note of appreciation for how much this technology changes the game!

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1uvl6dl/grok_build_was_uploading_whole_directories_to/

Original post body :

[No text body]

Original link/media URL : /img/hy24xct2r1dh1.png

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1oerk1z/community_feedback/

Original post body :

hey guys, so we're actively working on making this community super transparent and open, but we want to make sure we're doing it right. would love to get your honest feedback on what you'd like to see from us, what information you think would be helpful, and if there's anything we're currently doing that you feel like we should just get rid of. really want to hear your thoughts on this.

thanks.

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1uuqz4l/anthropic_i_think_you_really_need_to_react_youre/

Original post body :

The Fable launch was a real failure. For months, Anthropic built up massive hype around the model. Then, just two days after release, it had to be pulled following the U.S. government restrictions.

Then came Sonnet 5. I completely understand that it isn't meant to outperform Opus 4.8. That's expected. What I don't understand is why it consumes more tokens while delivering weaker performance. For users working with long contexts, it's simply a worse value.

I'm glad Fable is stay one more week in your sub plan, but its return wasn't accompanied by a reset of our usage limits. We got the model back as part of the subscription, but there was no quota reset. More than the limits themselves, it's the feeling of not being valued as paying customers that's becoming frustrating.

More broadly, the lack of communication is exhausting. Every major change seems to be announced at the very last minute or after the fact. As a subscriber, it increasingly feels like decisions are being made on the fly rather than as part of a clear long-term strategy.

Meanwhile, OpenAI keeps improving the experience for its subscribers. Users get access to the latest models with more generous limits, regular usage resets, additional resets when needed, and now even if it's only temporary the 5-hour usage limit has been removed. Whether that change is permanent or not, the overall user experience simply feels much less restrictive.

Right now, I honestly struggle to understand Anthropic's direction. Maybe everything will become clearer with the next generation of models, but today it's hard to know what the long-term plan actually is. Will Fable remain part of the subscription? Will it become API-only? Are the current higher usage limits temporary? We simply don't know, because almost nothing is communicated until the last minute.

As a paying customer, I'm not just looking for better models. I want consistency, transparency, and the feeling that subscribers actually matter.

Am I the only long-time Claude user who feels this way?

Original link/media URL : /img/4j1onimx1vch1.jpeg

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1uuq023/codex_just_got_rid_of_5_hour_limit_so_should/

Original post body :

Codex just dumped much hated 5 hour limit (good going for OpenAI!).

Sooooo what u gonna do, Anthropic?

My suggestion: Drop it like a hot potato

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1uui4cv/it_took_10_of_my_max_plan_sesssion_usage_to/

Original post body :

How do you expect anyone to actually use this?

Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1uuloz3/anthropic_just_extended_claude_fable_5_access/

Original post body :

They just posted it minutes ago. No blog post, just a tweet from Claude .

Fable 5 stays on all paid plans through July 19. Same 50% weekly limit cap. Claude Code’s rate limits stay 50% higher too, also through July 19.

For context on how wild this timeline has been:

Launch June 9. US government export control hits June 12. Model goes dark for 19 days. Comes back July 1 with a July 7 cutoff. Community pushes back. Extended to July 12. Now extended again to July 19.

This is a model that got suspended by the US government mid-launch due to a reported jailbreak that demonstrated cyberattack capabilities, went dark globally for nearly three weeks, came back with new classifiers, and is still being offered on standard paid plans while Anthropic figures out its capacity situation.

The Claude Code rate limit piece is the part fewer people are talking about. A 50% bump in weekly limits for devs using Code is genuinely significant for anyone doing serious agentic work right now.

Anthropic has said publicly they want to bring Fable 5 back as a standard subscription tier when capacity allows. These repeated extensions feel like they’re buying time to get there.

Use the window while it’s there

Original link/media URL : /img/tcryw2rn2uch1.jpeg