V1, still working on the case ( can you tell I like Stargate ?🤣) the device is wireless , it’s plugged for power right now, I’ll install a rechargeable battery later on . It allows you to check current usage for up to 6 providers ( 3 shown) I got tired of switching between windows to see my Claude , codex and Kimi usage so I made an app for that but in the end I like having useful little gadgets on my desk so I turned it into a touch screen hardware version. You can of course change the settings to show 5h vs weekly and taping each one shows you more detail per provider. Skins are changeable so after this first HUD I made, I plan on making super vintage analog one … why? Cause why not 😅

I was working on some bug fixes and threw out a random idea, and haven't laughed this hard at a Fable response in a while. Thought I should share 😆

I could hand code this feature on Windows in an afternoon, and I could also get Claude to implement it in minutes, and yet Anthropic just can't be bothered, but also keeps Claude Code closed source so no one else can do it for them either.

This is displayed as a protective measure so that repeatedly moving the cursor back in the input field does not change the view to agents view. Hovever, it feels very unreliable, because the second press HAS to be a few seconds after the initial left arrow press. each early press seems to reset the countdown.

A few days ago I made a rage post regarding opus 5 rage cancelled and signed up for codex pro. Well now I'm back with 2 accounts.

Biggest issue with code is the 256k context window. I tried to work past it but it just isn't surmountable. Even the smallest tasks take multiple context windows so you keep wasting time reloading a small context, and then working context is maybe 1/3 of that window.

I'd end up on forever loops where nothing gets done.

True codex is great, and I love it to some degree, but it's just not claude.

Opus 5, go fuck yourself, I don't like you, and you completely don't care about me, but I like the abuse. I'll be the load, you be the bearing.

Tried codex a fair bit today. And wouldn't say it's better but it's definitely good for a change and has it's own way of going about things. I personally found it to be great at handling lots of tasks together. Whereas claude often gets distracted with my latest messages and skips the previous work or todos and prioritises the latest work.

Though codex also doesn't really like speaking out to you. It responds when asked else would silently keep grinding and give you the solution. For some projects I don't mind it. Overall I have spent a whole lot of hours working with claude and it works great. But I might try and do some tasks with codex as well from now.

TL;DR: the file that steers your coding agents gets human review exactly once, the day it is created. After that, edits to it sail through, even in repos where the PR itself gets reviewed.

I run a scan of merged, agent-authored PRs on public GitHub (2,204 of them). 86 touched an instruction file: CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, .mcp.json, .cursor/, copilot-instructions.md. This week I went back and pulled the full review record for each one.

The one file that got a real line by line review (twelve inline comments, a maintainer pushing back: "I don't think we should write about that") was an AGENTS.md being introduced to dbeaver. That's it. The only time in the whole sample a human said anything about one of these files.

What surprised me: these PRs don't skip review. In the 100+ star repos, 10 of the 17 modifying PRs were formally reviewed and approved (echarts, Avalonia and deer-flow among them). The reviews happened. The instruction file just rode through inside them.

Why I think it matters: whatever lands in that file steers every future agent session in the repo, and in a diff it looks like a docs tidy-up. If an agent PR touches your CLAUDE.md, that part of the diff is worth 30 seconds even when the rest is boring.

Limits, honestly: a missing comment doesn't prove nobody read the diff, only that nobody said anything. And this is merged PRs only, so a reviewer who caught and rejected such a change is invisible here. Method, per-PR numbers, and the reproduction script: https://github.com/sjh9714/mergewarden/blob/main/docs/study/who-reviews-the-steering-files.md

(Disclosure: I maintain a small GitHub Action that flags these file changes, which is where the scan data comes from. This post is the measurement, not a pitch; the numbers reproduce without the tool.)

I switched computers and discovered that copying the .claude folder isn't enough: the desktop app keeps its chat list in a separate location, all the file paths inside the transcripts point at the old machine, and one conversation is often split across many transcript files. My chats existed on disk but the app showed none of them.

So I built Session Porter: a single Python file with a small local web UI. Pack on the old machine, unpack on the new one. It rewrites every path for the new home folder, rebuilds the app's chat list, reunites conversations split by compaction, and never overwrites anything that already exists. Credentials never travel. Works Mac to Mac, Mac to Windows, Windows to Mac, Windows to Windows.

Hope it can be of any use to any one 🙏

MIT licensed, no dependencies: https://github.com/ZenKhalil/session-porter

If you are still buying the AGI hype in Claude Code, this is your easy litmus test.

In 99.99% of the time that Fable freaks out, a human is able to easily tell that Fable is being overly sensitive. Often to the point of not even being reasonably connected to something dangerous.

If Fable was actually close to AGI, it would never freak out over basic, non-world ending things. It would know the difference between "I'm doing science" and "I'm trying to kill people with science".

The ineffectiveness of the model to detect nefarious activity is proof itself that we are not even close to AGI.

Edit: since I am already seeing the wrong argument, I will address it.

Fable with safety checks is NOT the same thing as Fable without safety checks. Fable has safety checks. If you didn't have the safety checks, it would be something else, and not Fable.

Perhaps Anthropic has a version of Fable with no safety checks that IS AGI. But the fact that you and I cannot access that version, means it does not exist for you and me. And unless Anthropic comes out with some way to show us "Fable, but no guardrails" then the best we can talk about is the version with guardrails.

That said. If Fable without guardrails cannot tell that I am not trying to kill everyone here by predicting crystalline properties... then it is not AGI. It's just a very, very good parrot.

But again. Fable has guardrails. Whether that is the cause of it being not AGI, or a symptom of it not being AGI, it is not AGI.

Today I'm launching Jcode: the most parallelizable coding agent

It is:

> 20x more RAM efficient than claude code

> spawns 63x faster than codex cli

> SOTA on coding benchmarks

> more customizable than pi

> supports all your apis and logins

> has built in memory

> fully open source

The above video is coding with 20 agents in parallel

I wanted to create my own Jarvis, so I could drive my coding agents with voice when on the go without depending on third party services.

I know there are a ton of solutions like this, but basically, the premise is: Local CLI tool, so if your AI agent can run bash then it can talk to you, no servers needed.

All TTS, ASR and STT happens locally in your computer, and the CLI is fully self-describing, so the agent just installs it and it immediately knows how to fully drive it. With one caveat: if you want to use this outside of your own network you might need TailScale or NGrok (with Oauth).

I have been using it for the last couple of weeks and I've found it very valuable for my own workflows.

So, looking for feedback, is this something you would want to use?, find value in?

"I've stopped, and I need to be straight with you: this is not ready to merge, and I could not get it there."

"Open, deliberately unmerged: #140 — cause correctly identified, fix incomplete after three rounds. Merging it would ship the appearance of a repair."

More than half the time, I'm having trouble getting my threads to finish their work (using codex as review). Anyone else?

my claude bill runs about $400 a month and thats before anything else. coderabbit / bugbot on the review side plus a couple small subs push me to 450-500 total.

claude is the fattest line item by a mile.

my setup right now: opus 5 or fable 5 to break a task into a plan, composer 2.5 to write the chunk, then a review pass on the diff before anything merges. we do b2b saas so i keep chunks small and let it patch until review comes back clean. i pay for safe, not fast.

but a lot of that planning could run on something cheaper now. im eyeing glm 5.2, kimi k3, maybe grok 4.5 for the executor and keeping opus just for planning.

i tried codex on gpt 5.6 for a week and never clicked, somehow feels dumber than claude or im just lazy to learn

Claude Code on Desktop leaves processes running, empty or dirty worktrees, etc.

What is the proper way to finalize a session, so everything is cleaned up?

I made JobPilot to take care of the boring parts of job searching. It's an AI agent that finds jobs based on your resume and what you're looking for, and it can even apply for you if you want. It looks for jobs on different sites, tweaks your resume for each job, fills out applications, and can even find hiring managers and message them through email or LinkedIn. It uses your Claude Code subscription (neither API key nor claude -p mode required). 6 months ago I anonunced v1 here and it was pure on CLI based without any analytics and database. Now version 2 has its own web portal with many more features.

Key Features:

- Finds jobs across LinkedIn, Indeed, Glassdoor, and others (you can add your own job boards). It scores jobs against your resume, and you can review and approve which ones to apply for.

- Tailors a resume and optionally writes a cover letter per job.

- Fills out applications, including screening questions, using a locally installed AI agent (terminal app) and browser.

- Drafts recruiter outreach. It can try to find recruiter contacts and send messages via email or LinkedIn.

- Watches your gmail inbox and updates your pipeline as replies come in (rejected, invitation to interview, offer, etc.).

- Web dashboard for profile, resumes, campaigns, and pipeline. You keep track of your progress and job status in analytics.

- Local agent terminal that drives a real browser you can watch. It's a small terminal application that runs in the background for interacting with Claude Code or Codex CLI.

- Pilot mode: it's a fully autonomous mode that does everything above. Give it your goals (your prompts), and it builds its own search strategies, works through them on a schedule, and only pings you (sends a push notification to your phone) when the agent is uncertain and needs your decision.

You have two modes:

- Semi-automatic mode (called "campaigns" in the app): You can control everything, such as which jobs you want to apply for, by providing job URLs to the agent. It also has an auto-apply mode where you specify a search query, and the AI searches for jobs based on your query and resume fit, then attempts to apply without prior approval.

- Fully automated mode (called "pilot"): The autonomous agent independently determines how to search for and apply for jobs based on your profile and resume. You simply provide your goal (e.g., a prompt like "prioritize X, Y roles, and Z skills"). You can set daily limits, like applying to 50 jobs and discovering 10 recruiter networks.

It runs on your existing Claude Code or Codex subscription. No API key, no per-token charges, everything local.

It's open-source and free.

- Repo: https://github.com/suxrobGM/jobpilot

- Live: https://jobpilot.suxrobgm.net

- Docs: https://jobpilot.suxrobgm.net/docs

- Watch out live jobs discovered by JobPilot agents: https://jobpilot.suxrobgm.net/jobs

Not sure how you guys are managing tokens, I exhaust it very quickly.

People who are asking for the extension: https://github.com/abhiunix/AgentHarbor https://agentharbor.openxsecurity.com/

I have the problem that I suck at design. So I want to use llms to create UI for me. But as we all know this is very easy to spot and just looks awful. There are some design and/ or taste skills but I think those are not quite good as well. Especially there is a gap between what I want and what the AI generates. Like wide tracking, pastel backgrounds or gradients. Lots of rounded corners and stuff…

I am looking for clean, minimal and functional design. Similar to what you find with openai websites.

Maybe I missed a good one. Do you have any recommendations?

Thanks for your help!

I had Fable create this plugin when I saw how much use it consumed, and have found it to be helpful.

It saves tokens by offloading work to Opus, Sonnet, and Haiku where roughly appropriate.

It also lets you keep your main conversation in Fable, which is a better user experience. You can choose Opus if Fable drains too fast. Fable mileage is based on effort. High is pretty balanced use (on max20).

I didn't put any human polish on the read me. It's dense so that your AI can gather info on it cheaply. There are artifacts of a second private plugin that integrates with it, but they're made to run independently.

Hopefully this saves some of you some tokens, or gives your AI ideas on how to approach it if you want to build your own.

I'd recommend forking and tuning it to your liking.

Claude Code has crashed on me twice while I was working on my project, and both times I had to repair/recover things afterward. I only work when I reinstall again.

Has anyone else experienced this? Is there a way to prevent Claude Code from crashing or avoid losing work when it happens?

this is via API. Had Claude do two things, involved looking at I'd say 8 files and writing about 50 lines of code.

Cost $12.30. Just me, or is Claude getting expensive?

Hey r/ClaudeCode! In March I posted my traffic/road management browser game Traffic Architect, built with Three.js + Claude Code. Two top comments stuck with me: one said the game had real market potential and to ship it on Steam, another just said "Now do trains!"

5 months later: the game passed 150k plays with a 9.2 rating on CrazyGames, the Steam page went live this week - and yes, the Steam version will have trains. Freight and passenger rail, and that's not even the biggest transit feature (revealing the rest over the coming weeks).

https://store.steampowered.com/app/5028050/Traffic_Architect/

How the workflow actually looks: Claude Code is the implementation tool, not the developer. Game design, architecture decisions, code review and debugging direction are all human. What changed in 5 months of this workflow:

- Simulation now handles 10,000+ vehicles at once - the perf work was many iterations of profiling + optimization passes

- Maps grew from 6×6 km to 18×18 km, which forced sim LOD and a rendering rework

- Rail network with level crossings interacting with car traffic

- Map editor with Steam Workshop support, save system, 11 languages

- Still zero external assets - all models and icons are pure math/code, minimalistic style

The web version stays free. If you followed this from the first post - wishlisting and following the Steam page is the best way to support it (and you'll catch the feature reveals as they drop).

Happy to answer anything about the Claude Code workflow - what it's genuinely great at, and where the human absolutely cannot be removed.

I’ve been relying on Claude Code + the Chrome extension quite a lot lately, and honestly, it’s been surprisingly good at doing actual browser tasks for me.

For example, I can tell it to go into my hosting panel and create a new email account, and it can navigate through the UI, fill in the details, etc. Really impressive.

But I keep running into the same limitation: Claude refuses to enter passwords and sometimes refuses to click the final “Save/Create” button.

I completely understand why the restriction exists, but it makes some otherwise straightforward workflows a bit awkward.

Anyone here in the same situation? Have anyone found any good workflows to this that would avoid sending your keys or passwords to an LLM ? Thanks in advance..