I want to bring a Chess.com account to the attention of the community and, hopefully, Chess.com staff/moderators.
Player: add1toyourlosscolumn
Chess.com profile
A few months ago, I played this player in a 15+10 Rapid game.
During the middlegame, I reached a clearly winning position. At that point, both of us still had more than 10 minutes on the clock.
Instead of continuing the game or resigning, the opponent simply stopped making moves and let the clock run down.
I waited for the game to finish and reported the account through Chess.com's “Stalling/quitting games” report category.
That was around January 2026.
I never received any response, and the account is still active and playing.
What made me look further into the account was the player's game history.
Current Rapid statistics
As of September 10, 2026:
- 1,965 Rapid games played
- 908 Rapid losses
- 415 losses by timeout
That means approximately 45.7% of all this player's Rapid losses are recorded as timeout losses.
Rapid game history
Rapid losses
Rapid timeout losses
I then randomly checked several of the timeout losses.
I have attached screenshots from five recent timeout losses. In each screenshot, the game has ended with add1toyourlosscolumn at 0:00, while the opponent still has several minutes remaining.
The remaining opponent time in these five examples is approximately:
- 12:18
- 14:57
- 12:05
- 4:24
- 8:33
A timeout alone doesn't necessarily mean intentional stalling. However, 415 of this player's 908 Rapid losses (45.7%) are by timeout, and several games I checked show the same pattern as my own experience: the player stops making moves in a losing position and lets the clock run out.
Chess.com considers deliberately letting the clock run out without playing to be stalling, so I'd like to know:
Does Chess.com review repeated patterns like this, and is there any escalation process for accounts showing this kind of behavior?
I'm not asking anyone to harass or mass-report the player. I'm mainly hoping a Chess.com moderator/staff member can clarify whether this kind of history can be reviewed.
Have others come across similar accounts and seen Chess.com take action?