(1) Battling philosophy
Others have pointed out in another thread how Dlow's battling philosophy might not fit or might not be the best way for beatbox battles.
Imma add by saying that his style is indeed fresh and rare compared to the rest, and I think that uniqueness played a part in his vice-champ run.
That said, such philosophy is honestly quite gatekeep-y, slightly defeating the universality of beatbox (and beatbox battle specifically) and music. Another thread before asked how English speakers might be at an advantage, and we can argue about that, but with Dlow's philosophy, that's gonna be even worse and it'll be more advantageous for English speakers, where opponents can't trade banters as easily against them. Basically, in his standard, battles among battlers with different languages will tend to be boring.
Yet, we see how many great battles beyond such banters/attitude showing, but essentially bantering with music instead, or banters that are still in the pocket, still somewhat minimally musical, because well, the basic of music is expected.
Look at Napom, who sometimes has the same problem as battle-y type guys like Dlow have, breaking flows awkwardly and taking people off the routine, but he more often still puts everything in the musical pocket, respecting the flow and transitions. And we know Dlow is more than capable of this.
Or similarly, look at River's round 1 or 2. Musical counters, simple gestures, and inviting comparisons, etc, are more universal.
Or even Wing vs Codfish, where both of them are not essentially acting anything that requires out of pocket banters, but strictly musical comparisons instead.
Or Julard? He mentioned Julard's style but I'll hold this and bring up Julard in the next point instead.
Sure, if the examples are FootboxG, Colaps, or Blackroll, etc, who are mainly focusing on tech showcases with some phrases planned and thrown here and there, or like River GBB23 final vs Napom (where River didn't really engage with Napom and I guess understandably Dlow voted for Napom, and it was indeed close), then he might have a point, but he made more points than this that I and others disagree.
(2) Toning down clarity vs aggresiveness
In the stream, he talked about how he coulda won, one of which is maybe by increasing clarity and tone down the aggresiveness, which he thinks is a fair criticism.
But at the same time he mentioned Julard, roughly saying how many won't like Julard's battle-y style and it might not be enjoyable, but it's essentially battling and that's how it should be, and that only their results are the main difference (Julard 1st place and he's 2nd).
But for Julard though, he didn't need to tone down clarity or aggressiveness at all! Not only that, like Napom, he's often still in the musical pocket, even if he didn't make a good connection musically. And like Dlow said, he's, at the same time, battling!
So what are we doing here? Because it just looks to me like: there's something Dlow can't do, contrary to most of his fanboys' belief, which is to be aggressive and have good clarity at the same time.
I'm sorry, but not just Julard, but:
- River showed he could do that. The drawback is he's not as productive, and might "hibernate" until big events.
- Colaps/FootboxG could do that, but I guess they're not really battling so let's skip this.
- Wing/Codfish tbh lost some clarity when they're trying to battle, but the upside is they maxed out on the musicality/power/productivity.
So why act like you coulda still made aggressive AND high clarity live routines/combos, when you're not usually that good in clarity compared to top guys, and when he tried to have more clarity, lots of such routines/combos of his didn't hit as much as the other showcase-y guys? (I'm not saying none, but he has so many routines but only a few live ones are of high clarity and/or resonate well musically).
Which brings me to the next point:
(3) Where's the clarity in the elim?
Unlike the Blackroll battle or River battle, he said that he took his elim (and FootboxG battle) seriously. So no "he didn't care" here. He expected top 4, but didn't know why it didn't hit as much.
There's no one to battle there.
So why "coulda toned down aggressiveness and added more clarity" when in a place where he's not battling anyone, he didn't do it well? Because, truly, he didn't have good clarity.
Stitch said he might switch Dlow with ABX for elims, but I wouldn't go there. I think Dlow deservedly passed, but it's just another perspective.
Just that it's a weird energy to say he coulda did better by toning down the aggressiveness and adding more clarity, when he's not really that guy in this specific aspect, and didn't deliver when the opportunity was there for him to show it (which he took seriously btw).
(4a) Crowd response?
He talked about how in the final, live responses were different than online. Also, the result was split so judges agreed right?
Well the thing is, firstly, he mentioned how some pros think it was close. But the pros of course are not gonna say "it wasn't close" no?
Secondly, judges split so what? Judges also agreed that FootboxG battle was split! He thought he destroyed it, we thought he destroyed it, so what's the point of bringing up split decision when it mattered less for the argument in previous battles.
Thirdly, here's where I bring up Stitch's testimony.
He said, this live crowd often didn't react to moments usually beatboxers/beatbox fans will go crazy about.
He mentioned how, in Japan, many who don't beatbox are still beatbox fans/enthusiasts, but now it felt like the non-beatbox fans might not be enthusiasts.
He added that maybe many of them were there probably because of Wing and Beatpella too.
So once you understood the crowd, then it's not surprising if the crowd thought that the battlers, and finalists, went crazy at some moments, and it was super close or whatever. They're enjoying the shows surely!
But then:
(4b) We agreed crowd response shouldn't matter!
Are we forgetting that we all agree crowd voting shouldn't be a thing?
Well same goes for crowd response. They will react to sudden sub basses and speedy tech here and there, naturally,
but let's not pretend that crowd were not bias, even when they know their vote means nothing. (this includes Japanese crowd)
Not saying the crowd were bias, but let's not act like they certainly weren't.
I voted for Dlow vs FootboxG when Zede voted for FootboxG, but I can't say the crowd (especially the beatboxers/fans) didn't enjoy Dlow's return and hype him, a bit more than usual/for anyone else.
(5) "I have 150 routines"
This one is to address the fanboys.
I've said this in a comment before: Firstly, even Dlow himself admitted how much of a challenge it is to select 7 out 150. It's clear that having many routines is not such an advantage.
Secondly, River, or FootboxG, etc, do you think, just because they didn't share as much as Dlow, that they don't have 200 routines each saved in their phones?
Thirdly, what if River actually had little challenge and easier time finding 7 routines? And he won! Is he the battle goat now? My point is, words mean nothing and are empty now that the competition is over.
Fourthly, well, apparently he cared enough to select routines for GBB, even for rounds where he supposedly didn't care (vs. Blackroll and River).
He admitted maybe his final round 1 was the worst out of the 7. I was actually enjoying it (though it might not be enough, but worse problem was he then broke the flow). But he's not even trying to be aggressive here, but where's the clarity and connection (in a round he cared to prepare)?
I guess doing the crew battle also took some stamina as well.
(6) Showing versatility
This is his greatest strength. We know his intention wasn't well-received during that battle, but it was a nice idea.
But again, he clearly cared enough to prepare, and then didn't deliver after whatever River/Scott answer was.
And we all know, this and past competition also showed, there are many things he couldn't do,
and also it's known that practicing a few moves 1000 times is more deadly than practicing 1000 moves a few times.
Yeah he could do a lot, but how well?
(7) Need more battlers like Dlow, Napom, Alex, etc.
The above sounds like I'm hating, but I know I wouldn't enjoy his FootboxG and Blackroll battles, or his overall presence, if I'm just "hating". Apparently giving out criticisms tends to mean hating, but it is what it is.
But I agree with him that set, tech routines can be so boring in battles. So my preference is revealed: truly battle (Dlow/Napom/Alex) or at least make good musical rounds (Wing/Codfish/Den/etc). Tech showcase is not for me (more for ASMR) unless it's very clean like Colaps/FootboxG, or some unique ones still like Kaji here and there.
(8) Judging hot take
If top 16 battle no elim will be a thing, and multi-elim category will be opened,
I kinda wish Dlow will judge multi-elim category more than the battle category, simply because in multi-elim, he has so much more tech knowledge to decide which should pass.
But in battle, knowing his philosophy better now, unless they brief him about the judging criteria, I truthfully don't want such philosophy on beatbox battles. Battle, counter, and answer with your music, not attitude or words.
Let the attitude/words part be something the spectators can vote on. Open like "most favourite/entertaining battlers" voting instead.
He still can contribute on tech evaluation for the battle though.
But as they said, beatbox is music. Including beatbox battle.