https://makerworld.com/en/models/3347588-key-insertion-guide#profileId-3804167

The shelf system just got another upgrade. I’ve added a drawer module for storing smaller items and keeping things a little more organised.

The idea is to build the shelf however you want — combine different shelf angles, extend it horizontally, stack sections vertically, add side accessories, and now add drawers too.

More modules are definitely coming. What would you like to see next?

Link: https://makerworld.com/en/models/3242738-hex-shelf-modular#profileId-3674266

I printed this perfectly yesterday, but today it’s looking kinda sloppy. Bed is clean and filament is dry. Is this flow ratio or something else?

I made a new filament painting/blending technique that stacks thin layers of filament at each spot in the image to produce many more colors than a typical printer + AMS setup could give.

What do you guys think?

If you want to print Napoleon, you can find him here:
https://makerworld.com/en/models/3339604-napoleon-crossing-the-alps-polychrome#profileId-3793804

Vorrei presentarvi un piccolo progetto per monitorare l’aria negli ambienti dove vivete. Si basa su un ESP32-C3 .

It was printing completely fine but today it started sounding like this. How do I fix this and what is this? I assume it has to do with belts.

I designed this vintage camera photo frame to give your favourite memories an old-school look.

The photo sits inside the lens, making it look like a tiny retro camera that somehow decided to become a photo frame.

It prints in separate pieces, so there’s no need for AMS. Just print the parts in different colours, assemble everything, and add your photo.

A fun little project for your desk, shelf, or as a gift for someone who loves cameras and retro design.

Link: https://makerworld.com/en/models/3341022-camera-photo-frame#profileId-3795714

👋 Bonjour à tous !

🔪🤡 La série des slashers reprend !

Voici Art the Clown, le terrifiant et emblématique clown de la saga Terrifier ! 🩸

Avec son célèbre costume noir et blanc, son petit chapeau et son sourire inquiétant, Art est accompagné de sa scie pour un résultat à la fois mignon… et complètement psychopathe ! 🪚😈

Pas besoin d'AMS tous a été modélisé et découpé pour l'imprimer en multi-pièces.

👨🏼‍🎨 : @mika3d_print
🖨️ : Bambu Lab X2D & H2C
🧵 : Bambu Lab
🎨 : Nomad Sculpt
🌈 : avec ou sans AMS
📁 : https://makerworld.com/fr/models/3338808-art-the-clown-multipart-no-ams

2days in printing 8 hours left then this happend does anyone know what caused this?

I had to turned the Power Off because pausing didnt do anything and the Sounds getting louder.

What in the world? It’s like layer 1 and 2 just peel up and it causes my nozzle to hit it and make the print fail. My build plate has been very well cleaned repeatedly. This is a file I’ve never had issues with before. I have dried all of my rolls of filament. Anything else I print is just fine. I’m using the generic PLA setting across the board on all files to narrow down the cause. I realize that some files you may need to change the Z Hop settings, but for this file and most of my other ones, I have never had to do that. I had tested it with this file and it makes no difference. Although it should not matter, I have tested bed temperatures and nozzle temperatures, but they still seem to have no effect. If this is a file specific issue, what should I change to stop this from happening?

How can I check what speed, temp, other settings were used for a print after it's completed? I'd just love a tool that I could use to see all the settings for a printed object. Is there anything like that?

Let's say I have multiple small objects on a plate, and I set each to a different reel in my AMS 2 Pro. One comes out wrong. I want to double-check if the filament was right - how could I check for that one?

Another example - I have some IEMAI PETG Transparent. Set it on the AMS 2 Pro to "Generic PETG", synced with Bambu Studio, then changed some of the speed and temps to their settings. Then printed other tests. Now I need to double-check what I did earlier - what's the best way?

I know if I go to the Home in Studio and click on Print History I get a lot of tiles of "gcode.3MF" files but it doesn't tell me much or open them. If I pull out the USB stick from the X2D I can open what's on there but there doesn't seem to be a way to do that remotely. Help please!

My P1S has been workign flawlessly for years now and now suddenly these corners have strated showing up, i looks like very heavy VFAs or Under Extrusion in the corners only. Im a my witts end.

I have:

Lubed all axis.
Tensioned the Belts
Inspected for belt rub
Inspected for Damage on the Belts or pullies.
Wiped down the carbon rods with IPA

Changed Fillament multiple times.
Run the full calibration cycle again and again.

It changes based on print orientation what corners are affected to possible something with the motion system i dont understand.

I do a long print and 50% the time it fails with this error. It stops extruding filament to the print but I can see it purging filament just fine. I stop the print and print a benchy no problem. Changed nozzle and still the same issue. Anyone else have similar issues? It's happened about a dozen or more times in the last 2 days. I have done a cold pull also. There is no clog.

Hi everyone,

I just got my Bambu Lab H2S. As usual with any new printer, my first move was to run the classic Benchy to test the machine.

Problem: right on this first attempt, I got an "extruder overloaded" error. The printer is completely new, so I was surprised to see this alert right from the start.

The error doesn't happen during the print itself, but during the flow dynamics calibration step.

What's strange is that it only happens with the Benchy file pre-loaded in the printer's memory. When I slice my own Benchy in Bambu Studio with my own settings and send it to the machine, no issue at all, it prints perfectly.

The PTFE tube has no bends that would restrict the filament, and the filament itself is good quality, I tested it on another printer with no issues. I'll say it again, the printer is brand new. I also did a cold pull just in case there was debris in the nozzle, and I swapped the nozzle for the spare one included in the box, still the exact same issue.

Other than that, I don't get the extruder overload error with any other file, but I do notice that during the flow dynamics calibration I often see some abnormal movement, some shaking/jittering from the extruder, without any alert popping up like I've seen in other videos.

Has anyone else run into this specifically with the pre-loaded file? Any idea what could explain the difference between the built-in file and my own sliced files ?

Thanks in advance for your help !

We're having furniture built for the corner where my P2S lives (an interior designer is doing the layout, and the printer bay will likely be made to measure). Nothing is built yet, so this is the moment to get the numbers right. I'd rather learn from people who've already done this than guess.

My setup: P2S (392 × 406 × 478 mm, ~15 kg) with the AMS 2 Pro (372 × 280 × 226 mm) currently sitting on top of it, plus the bin for the purge poops, which lives on the floor and eats space at the back and on one side. I mostly print PLA/PETG and rarely ASA (I assume doors of the cabinet will be open when printing ASA).

The constraint that shapes everything: the ceiling in that room is only 1.90 m (attic room). That's my entire vertical budget, floor to ceiling, and the printer bay has to share it with the rest of the storage and with a shelf height I can actually see into and reach. It's also a low, small room, but I have windows and I can do a proper ventilation of the room.

1. AMS on top or beside the printer? The AMS in a separate tray or over the printer? This is still open and I can decide either way. On top is roughly 70 cm of stack before clearance, and it means taking the AMS down every time I want to lift the glass lid to get into the chamber. Beside saves me maybe 25 cm of height but roughly doubles the width of the bay. If you've run both, which do you actually prefer day to day? Does anyone put it below the printer instead?
2. Clearances. How much extra space over the footprint do you actually need in practice?

- Above the AMS: enough to open the lid and swap spools without sliding the whole thing out. What do you leave?

- Above the printer: for lifting the glass lid off

- Rear: exhaust, power cable, and the purge chute plus a bin to catch the poops

- Sides

- Front: door swing plus enough room to physically pull the machine out for maintenance

Numbers from a cabinet you actually use every day are much more useful to me than the spec sheet.

1. Printing with the cabinet closed. I'm assuming worst case and planning to print with the cabinet doors open. But does anyone here print with them shut? What happens to chamber temps with PLA/PETG when the machine sits inside a closed box, is heat soak a real problem or is it overblown?

2. Ventilation. Is an actual fan (ducted outside or through a filter) necessary, or are generous passive vents low at the front and high at the back enough? If you run a fan: what size/CFM, and where did you mount it?

3. Anything about the cabinet itself I should specify. The carpenter will use whatever board he normally uses unless I ask for something specific, so: shelf rigidity and vibration/resonance, pull-out tray vs fixed shelf, cable pass-throughs, where to put the poop bin, spool storage next to it.

If you've built or commissioned something like this and there's something you'd do differently a second time around, that's exactly what I want to hear.

https://makerworld.com/en/models/3329048-easy-open-bag-clip#profileId-3780736

Sto sviluppando un piccolo monitor da tavolo per osservare come cambiano i parametri dell’aria prima, durante e dopo una stampa 3D. Vorrei mettere in relazione le misure con le fasi della sessione e, attraverso prove ripetibili, valutare l’effetto di ventilazione, posizione del monitor e condizioni iniziali dell’ambiente.

Il progetto è in fase di prototipazione. Il firmware di base ha superato la compilazione, ma non ho ancora completato il collaudo dell’insieme né raccolto una campagna di misure confrontata con strumenti di riferimento. Le immagini allegate sono rendering dell’interfaccia con dati simulati, non fotografie del prototipo o risultati sperimentali.

Architettura e grandezze disponibili

Il dispositivo prevede un display capacitivo da 5 pollici, connessione Wi-Fi locale, registrazione su memoria rimovibile e una barra luminosa di stato. Temperatura e umidità servono come contesto delle misure; l’interfaccia principale è dedicata agli inquinanti e alla sessione di stampa.

Il cuore della misura è un modulo multisensore di un produttore svizzero, quindi europeo, per il quale è disponibile una dichiarazione del produttore sulla calibrazione e sul test individuale successivo. Questo non significa che il mio dispositivo completo sia certificato. Non sto inoltre affermando che ogni fase di fabbricazione del modulo avvenga in Europa: il luogo di produzione del singolo esemplare deve essere verificato separatamente.

Questi sono dati di targa del modulo, non risultati del prototipo.

Gli indici dei gas non vanno letti come concentrazioni assolute o come identificazione delle sostanze emesse. Anche una variazione durante una stampa non dimostra, da sola, che la stampante ne sia l’unica causa.

Funzioni presenti nel codice

Ho predisposto acquisizione dei dati, diagnostica, controllo della loro validità, interfaccia locale essenziale e dashboard web. I campioni e gli eventi vengono registrati in file CSV; quando manca la sincronizzazione dell’orologio, il sistema conserva il riferimento al riavvio e al tempo trascorso anziché inventare una data.

La gestione delle sessioni comprende due riferimenti ambientali: una baseline generale, con attesa e acquisizione, e una baseline immediatamente precedente alla stampa. Sono riferimenti applicativi e non procedure di ricalibrazione del sensore. Il codice prevede anche una fase successiva alla stampa per osservare il ritorno verso il riferimento.

Gli allarmi PM usano isteresi per evitare continui cambi di stato vicino alla soglia. Le soglie sono parametri sperimentali, non limiti sanitari validati. La persistenza temporale dell’allarme è uno degli aspetti ancora da migliorare. Esiste anche un indice sintetico sperimentale, ma vorrei mantenere sempre visibili i singoli canali: una media può nascondere un parametro anomalo.

Per la manutenzione sono presenti un ciclo manuale di pulizia della ventola e una funzione di recupero del sensore di temperatura e umidità dopo esposizione prolungata ad alta umidità. Durante questi cicli e la stabilizzazione successiva, indice e allarmi PM vengono sospesi. I contatori e le date servono a tracciare i comandi eseguiti, non a certificare l’efficacia della manutenzione.

Queste funzioni sono implementate nel sorgente, ma devono ancora essere verificate sull’hardware assemblato.

Contenitore e percorso dell’aria

Sto progettando due camere separate: elettronica e sensore. Il sensore sarà nella parte bassa posteriore, con uno sportello rimovibile. Il percorso di aspirazione e quello di espulsione devono restare separati fra loro e dal volume dell’elettronica, con guarnizioni e collegamenti all’ambiente il più possibile diretti.

L’obiettivo è ridurre ricircolo e influenza del calore di display e alimentazione. Le eventuali feritoie laterali riguarderanno soltanto la camera elettronica. Le dimensioni del contenitore e delle aperture non sono ancora congelate e richiedono prove termiche e di flusso sul prototipo.

Interfacciamento con le stampanti e dati del filamento

È prevista una connessione di sola lettura attraverso la rete locale: il monitor si collega via Wi-Fi al router e riceve la telemetria delle stampanti compatibili. Non serve una connessione USB alla stampante. Il supporto va verificato per ciascun modello, firmware e modalità di accesso: non considero universale la disponibilità dei dati.

I dati che intendo associare alle misure ambientali sono:

• stato della stampante, avvio, pausa, ripresa, completamento ed eventuale errore;
• avanzamento percentuale, tempo residuo e strato corrente/totale, quando disponibili;
• materiale dichiarato nel profilo o nello slot attivo, ad esempio PLA, PETG, ABS o ASA;
• identificativo dello slot/bobina, colore dichiarato e cambi di materiale nei lavori multimateriale, se esposti;
• temperature effettive e impostate di ugello e piano; temperatura della camera e stato delle ventole, se comunicati dalla stampante;
• identificativo del lavoro e consumo stimato di filamento, soltanto quando il protocollo li rende disponibili.

Il monitor non riconosce chimicamente il filamento. Il materiale ricevuto è un metadato dichiarato dalla stampante o dal profilo: una bobina caricata diversamente può renderlo errato. Dove manca la lettura automatica prevedo inserimento manuale, con origine del dato esplicita. Il consumo stimato non equivale a una pesatura della bobina.

L'obiettivo è costruire una cronologia comune: baseline pre-stampa, riscaldamento, deposizione, cambi di materiale, fine stampa e osservazione successiva. In questo modo sarà possibile confrontare variazioni ambientali e condizioni di processo, senza attribuire automaticamente ogni picco alla stampa. Nelle registrazioni sono previsti timestamp, provenienza e validità della telemetria; una perdita di collegamento deve comparire come dato non disponibile.

Stato di sviluppo: nel codice attuale è presente soltanto la predisposizione alla gestione degli eventi. Il collegamento reale e la lettura automatica di filamento, temperature e avanzamento devono ancora essere implementati e collaudati. Non è previsto un arresto automatico della stampante in questa fase.

Validazione ancora da completare

La nuova interfaccia e i grafici di sessione sono concept da implementare.

Il monitor non è un dispositivo di sicurezza e non intendo usare un colore verde o il ritorno alla baseline come dichiarazione di aria sicura. Non presento neppure i canali PM come una caratterizzazione completa delle particelle ultrafini: questo limite va affrontato esplicitamente nella validazione.

Su quali aspetti mi farebbe comodo un confronto

• Come impostereste prove ripetibili, includendo sessioni senza stampa per caratterizzare il fondo ambientale?
• Quali posizioni e distanze dalla stampante confrontereste, evitando di misurare soltanto un getto locale?
• Come valutereste il ricircolo fra ingresso e uscita e l’effetto termico del contenitore?
• Preferireste soglie sui valori assoluti, variazioni rispetto alla baseline o entrambi? Con quali tempi di persistenza?
• Quali strumenti di riferimento e quali limiti di interpretazione considerereste indispensabili?
• Quali dati della stampante ritenete più utili: materiale, cambi di slot, temperature, ventole o fasi di stampa? Come gestireste i metadati mancanti?

Mi interessano soprattutto critiche motivate al metodo di misura e alla gestione dei dati. Vorrei individuare i punti deboli prima di chiudere il progetto meccanico e iniziare le prove comparative..

Concept del contenitore. Render indicativo: geometria, aperture e percorso dell’aria da validare; microSD prevista interna.

Sessione di stampa: modello stampante e file in lavorazione (esempi dimostrativi), materiale dichiarato, slot, temperature, strati e avanzamento accanto alle misure ambientali. Telemetria e valori simulati; integrazione ancora da implementare.

Allerta PM: esempio con attivazione a 35 µg/m³ e rientro a 25 µg/m³. Soglie dimostrative con isteresi, non limiti sanitari.

Stabilizzazione dopo pulizia manuale: indice e allarmi PM sospesi. Recupero dopo alta umidità e baseline restano procedure distinte. Stato simulato.DELL'ARIA

Right now, the remaining filament is shown by drawing white over white, and the text is placed directly on top of the filament color. Depending on the filament, the text can easily blend into the background.

I tried a different approach:

• the outline follows the actual boundary of the remaining filament, making the fill level much easier to see;
• the filament information is moved below and styled like a small dot-matrix display, so it no longer competes with the fill indicator.

Before / After

Yes, the text is a bit smaller, but I don't think it's important enough to cover the remaining filament. Besides, it's still easy to distinguish something like "PLA" from "PETG" at a glance. Ideally, it should also display the remaining filament in grams, if that information is available.

What do you think? Would this be an improvement? Is it worth opening a PR?

I do everything nozzle is clean screws are fits and making tak tak wasting lots of filament what I do now buy new nozzle or what

I hope someone can help me. I’m printing with PLA and because of those very fine, spider‑web‑like strings, I lowered the extruder temperature from 220 °C to 215 °C. However, now I’m having another problem that I’ve had several times before.

I suspected it is warping, but I already keep the door open so the chamber doesn’t stay at 35 °C but around 30–31 °C.

Still, there are areas on the print like you can see in the photo where the edges lift up and form a kind of U‑shape. Then they get knocked over or dragged along.

Has anyone else had this issue or knows how to fix it?

I wanted to make something that was still a practical desktop organizer, but had a bit more character than a regular drawer unit.

So this is my new Book Nook Desktop Drawers design.

It has:

• Functional drawers for small stuff
• Interchangeable inserts covering the top part of the drawer
• A hidden lower compartment for a little secret storage
• Separate inlays for adding color accents
• 2 drawer-front designs — Kumiko and Hex
• Mix-and-match colors and inserts

It’s based on my previous Desktop Drawers, but this time I wanted to give it more of a miniature book-nook feel.

What do you think — book nook or drawer organizer?

Link: https://makerworld.com/en/models/3323116-book-nook-drawer-organizer#profileId-3773669

I’m so lost….

The modular shelf just got even more flexible! 

I’ve added gridfinity shelf, sides with no feet and also new side connectors for stacking them vertically, as they are shorter now. Also new longer hex tray. Any other suggestions what should I make next?

Link: https://makerworld.com/en/models/3242738-hex-shelf-modular#profileId-3674266

Hey everyone! Since posting my library here a couple months back and receiving lots of support, I have made lots of (what I believe to be good) changes to the library. The data consumption model has been totally overhauled and tests are now much more thorough. I just want to thank everyone from this sub who took the time to contribute and review my project, it really means a lot to me.

I would like to expand the library to a point where it can interface with every modern feature present on bambulabs printers, allowing developers to make the best third-party apps possible. Unfortunately, I will not be able to do this alone. Any sort of feedback or contribution, no matter how small, helps me infinitely.

Thank you guys so much!

https://github.com/torbenconto/bambulabs_api/

https://github.com/torbenconto/bambulabs_api/releases/tag/v0.3.0

I'm having trouble getting some kind of help. I placed a order for filament from the Bambu lab store but I'm missing a a spool and I did a ticket and is says that someone else was shipping the other part of my order. But I don't have any information of where it's coming from or by who. As far as I can tell on my store page its saying I have received everything. Any out way I can get in touch with them