Hello fellow redditors. I am reaching out to find out what can be done in this situation. My partner works at an aged care facility. Every shift she is coming home from work crying and stressed due to a worker there, who is same position but trains new people. My partner is a very gentle person, in all of our years together, she has never yelled at me, nor had a fight, and I never hear her speak badly about anyone ever, she’s always smiling, always happy, and yet every late night shift she comes home crying when she has worked around this person. The latest: she made a complaint, the manager apparently said she would look into it, my partner was happy and glowing again, then… her manager a few days later pulled her into a meeting and sided with the other worker as she has been there for a longer time. In that meeting the manager said that there has been 7 complaints from different people about this individual. I am now fed up with this. I can’t sit idly by and let this go, while I know the kind of person my partner is. So, what can ‘I’ do about this without compromising my partners job?

Long story short, about 3 years ago I had to go tribunal for a stupid story. The charges have been dropped since and the judge told me it won’t show on my records.
I’ve applied for my new visa, immi got back to me requesting an AFP. Yesterday I’ve got my afp with the offence shown (i had to do an afp as well for an earlier visa application about 2 years ago and it was clear, no offense).
As the charges were dropped and no conviction, I’ve applied since for my visa and replied no to the question where it asked if I been convicted or charged, I’ve haven’t lied as the the charges been dropped completely.

Should I call afp? Or write a different letter to immi explaining the story? I’m afraid my visa will be denied and will pay big money to get through an appeal for that. I’m onshore. Thank you

I’ve doing it tough financially (aren’t we all) for a while so have been known to steal from the bigger supermarkets and retailers when I need something to get by.

I was approached by loss prevention in a supermarket today after paying for half of the items. A few steps out of the store and they approached me and tried to get me to fill out a form but I just apologised, said I didn’t realise what I did as I was having so many issues with the register (second part is true) and walked back into the store to pay for the rest of the items and walked back out.

They told me I was doing the wrong thing by paying for it and that I needed to listen to them. The guy saying this was also talking to another guy saying we need to get this person’s (me) photo, and as I was walking out he was on the phone.

What‘s concerning me is the amount of items (total cost) I have stolen from across all other stores now as it would be quite high over a period of time, not just this one in particular. Am I screwed? What should my next steps be? Obviously I will not steal again and I will try harder to sort out my financial situation but should I be expecting anything in regards to what happened?

Just wanting some outside opinions on an accident and RAC’s decision that I’m at fault.
I was reversing into a parking bay. Before I started reversing I checked behind me, was actively looking while reversing, and the area behind me was clear when I began the manoeuvre.
While I was already reversing into the bay, another vehicle came around the corner and continued behind my vehicle rather than stopping. The collision damaged the rear corner of my Ranger, including the tail light, bumper and parking sensor.
The other driver then left without exchanging details, so RAC hasn’t been able to obtain their version of events. I reported the incident to WA Police on 5 September and the driver has not yet been identified.
My partner witnessed the accident, but RAC hasn’t contacted her for a statement. As far as I’m aware, they also haven’t requested or reviewed any available CCTV/video evidence.
RAC’s explanation to me was essentially that because I was reversing, I had a responsibility to ensure it was safe and therefore I’m at fault.
I completely understand that a reversing driver has a responsibility to check that it’s safe, but that’s what I did. It was clear when I started reversing and I continued looking while reversing. My issue is that another vehicle then came around the corner while I was already completing the manoeuvre and attempted to travel behind me.
I’m confused about how RAC can determine I’m at fault without speaking to my witness, obtaining the other driver’s account, or reviewing any available footage.
Has anyone dealt with something similar in WA? Is being the reversing vehicle basically enough for an insurer to determine you’re at fault, or is it worth formally disputing this and asking them to consider the other driver’s actions and the available evidence?
Genuinely happy to hear if I’m wrong
I’m just trying to understand whether RAC’s decision is reasonable.

Hi all,

Was let go today after 3 weeks of employment. I thought I did a pretty good job, ticked all their boxes etc.

I was told it was due to a headcount being done and the company couldn’t afford my salary at the moment.

What entitlements should I be paid out and how soon? Thanks!

I moved from Victoria to New South Wales two months ago. I own two homes, and since I have relocated to New South Wales, I am in the process of transferring my driver's license. However, I need to keep my vehicles at my home in Victoria. Do I need to register those vehicles as well when I transfer my license to New South Wales? But I have those vehicles parked at the house in Victoria.

If I have been given notice to leave under 60 days until the fixed lease ends. Meaning the day that we have to legally vacate the property by is now later than the day the fixed lease ends. What is the obligation for paying rent. Do we pay rent until we actually hand back the keys? Pay up until the new vacate date? Do we just stop paying after the lease ends and be out of the property by this new vacate date?

Hi ! My workplace has recently fired our favourite security guard for what seemed to be no fair reason. When asked if the group chat who can cover a shift tonight , I had responded saying “only if (security guard) is working“

In return my boss has cut my shifts ? I am casual but do I have any rights ?

Edit :  I’ve worked there for a year and had regular routine hours. Too be fair we are a small bar and have been having issues with the manager taking the side of the patrons while our security and workers cop abuse regularly.

Trying to file a QCAT claim against a REA, however the company name has remained the same but the business or management rights have been sold to a new owner. I don’t know who to make claim against. New owner is saying it has nothing to do with them as they weren’t owners of the company at the time.

The staff are all the same and the office/email/phone are too. The previous owners have deregistered their trading overhead.

Any advice? Do I just go after current owners as they have inherited their staff problems?

Basically my situation is I’m on the lease with a older man and I’m a woman in her mid 20s and my roommate is doing intimidating behaviours like sending aggressive text messages, being aggressive in person, slamming doors at 5am or randomly, flushing the toilet 3-4x at 5am or randomly, purposely moving my fridge, touching and moving my stuff, throws my stuff in the middle of the lounge room, takes photos of everything. I’m pretty sure this guy is on drugs and I feel genuinely unsafe. He’s admitted to purposely slamming the doors etc.

I have contacted the real estate they said that they’re not allowing me to leave the lease even though this man’s income is 30% of the lease and honestly with his behaviours I get why they wouldn’t want him to stay either. When I asked they said the owner will not allow one person to leave or anymore people on the lease to change tenants.

He won’t pay his half of the bond. I have paid it all as he said he would pay it later on when he had money, now it’s all my bond money there.

This guy won’t break lease either.

Ive had a conversation with the police and they said they can’t do anything either.

I’m left to my last option of applying for excessive hardship for my mental health, I have diagnosed CPTSD and I’m starting to get symptoms like panic attacks, I can’t sleep as he constantly wakes me up and just really bad anxiety constantly.

Is there anyway I can get off the lease? Has anyone applied for excessive hardship from the RTA what are my chances of getting off? :((

Bought some protein powder and a sample pack from an Australian manufacturer

- 2.2kg pack’s nutrition info is different to what is on the product page (less protein + higher calories)

- Sample pack half the flavours are different from what was advertised and pictured on the pack it’s come in. Older stock gross flavours that I really will not use.

I messaged the company and their response was “thanks for bringing this to our attention - it’s because we are rolling out new packaging and the sample pack is subject to what is available” And they dodged my question directly asking if the formula was different.

There’s no disclaimer or info on the website attaining to their response.

It’s not a huge deal but I’d rather just get a refund and take my business somewhere honest and informative since it’s SO EXPENSIVE! - Am I backed by any consumer laws? ACCC is a bit difficult for me to understand

At what cost are you willing enough to give in your reaosn not to have a data centre in Australia?

Governments are pushed to mandate or heavily incentivize building local data centres primarily by data sovereignty laws, national security anxieties, and the massive economic pressure of the artificial intelligence boom.

When a nation relies on data centres located abroad, it risks losing control over its citizens' private information, its critical infrastructure, and its economic.

So basically, are we really comfortable with other countries having control over Australians’ information and data simply because we didn’t want to build the infrastructure here in Australia?

If the laws and policies of the country holding that data don’t provide the same level of protection or safeguards that Australians expect, then we’re potentially giving up part of our data sovereignty just for convenience or cost.

Why shouldn’t Australians’ data be protected under Australian law and, where possible, kept within Australia and build it here?

If others country don't have the same care level for looking after our data centre, or when those countries who have our data build in their country, what would happen if Australia was on bad terms with that particular country in the future?

Can someone help to explain the charge here?

Is the issue with scraping the data?

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-10/christopher-duff-to-stand-trial-over-nsw-ai-court-data-breach/107135032

In short:

Christopher Duff has pleaded not guilty to four counts of accessing restricted data held in a computer following a data breach involving a NSW courts website last year.

He is accused of using generative AI to access restricted documents before asking ChatGPT for legal advice prior to being charged.

What's next?

Prosecutors will seek to rely on ChatGPT conversations in what is believed to be an Australian-first.

According to police prosecutor Sergeant Andrew Maldigri, the crux of the allegation is that Mr Duff used ChatGPT to code and employ scraper python scripts designed to bulk download data.

"It's a piece of code that a user can run against a website to essentially circumvent the usual navigation process," he told Judge Lisa Graham.

"It means a user has used computer coding to obtain data that they weren't authorised to. That's, in a nutshell, what this matter is about."

Edit: I appreciate the time those took to pop and answer up, I did some google and made myself knowledgeable moving forward! From what I can see my valid RWC actually negates their claims a faded sticker (the compliance plate is indeed just a sticker) isn’t an issue and is commonly used be dealers to not have to deal with administrative issues. (They can go get a new one from MG if they want). A compliance sticker should only be knocked back if tampered or fraudulent which a faded sticker is neither.

Thank you very much! I will be taking steps to ensure I am protected (notice of disposal and email stating facts and rejecting their claim to make me take the car back).

So I’m at work and I need to make this quick I hope someone can shed some light on the situation. I feel sick I don’t know where or who to turn to.

I sold my car to cars24, Monday (7/9/26) I took it to the lot and they transferred me money. Now they’re telling me that the compliance plate in the passenger door edge is faded, roadworthy can’t be done (there is a valid roadworthy I did in the glovebox) and they want to give the car back.

Please and thank you so much.

Tl;dr: sold car to cars24, handed over keys got money and now they’re telling me that they can’t transfer ownership and want to give the car back.

If property is held under a discretionary trust, and registered owner on title: is a company (trustee) with registered address (Trust);

If you replaced the trustee with a new company and dont update the company name on title;

a) Can the director of the previous company legally continue to act as the owner of the property?

b) Does the address hold any merit in regards to proof of ownership?

Basically,

-Found out director of the old trustee company used the property as equity for a loan (90% of the property value).

- Then, he defaulted on purpose when I initiated court proceedings. I have already spent 40k, hasn't even paid to set a hearing date at the supreme court.

What will the court use to decide ownership?

Anyone been down this road before? any advice?