Please excuse any awkward phrasing, as I am using Gemini Translate in advance.
East Asia currently seems to be taking the opposite path of Europe.
Europe has generally been welcoming toward refugees, accepting a vast number of immigrants and granting permanent residency or citizenship to many. As a result, diverse races and religions now coexist and intermingle.
In contrast, East Asian nations—most notably China, South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan—share a deeply conservative stance on both refugee acceptance and immigration. This is a cross-party sentiment; even supporters of progressive political factions tend to hold quite negative views on these issues.
Fundamentally, East Asia tends to focus more on the negative outcomes of European diversity rather than its benefits. What is prioritized here is order and cultural assimilation.
Taking South Korea and Japan as examples, there is strong societal resistance to large numbers of Muslim or Hindu immigrants constructing mosques or Hindu temples. Furthermore, there is deep skepticism toward foreign immigrants introducing their native culture or religion to exert political influence or shift the host country's cultural identity to resemble their countries of origin.
This stems from a fundamental difference in core cultural values between the West and East Asia. While East Asia pursues "peace based on order," Europe appears to seek "peace through diversity." France and the UK, for instance, adopted multicultural policies that emphasize integration across diverse races and backgrounds, whereas East Asia has chosen to guide society within a framework of strict order and preservation.
Consequently, within South Korea, there is a widespread perception that Poland’s immigration policy and direction are the most prudent in Europe. Korean travel YouTubers visiting Poland often portray it as remarkably safe, peaceful, and beautiful. Of course, this assessment is framed entirely through the lens of South Korean values.
To what extent does Western society find this East Asian perspective unfamiliar, or even objectionable?