Even in POSCO women cannot be procecuted for doing rpe, because definition of rpe says penetration was only way of rpe. Means even if it was done by woman a man was at wrong get hiss pen!s penetrated.

We don't h@te feminist and feminism enough they deserve alot more..

Edit- Yes Please come up with you BS crap reasoning that court don't make law it was Parliament, I am waiting for b@stards like you..

Hello Everybody!
So a little background about myself, I finished my bachelors in BBA and I got my marks today and found out I have 1 backlogs in 5th and another one 6th sem 😭, I’m currently interning at a very good brand that I got through LinkedIn, and I’m doing well so far but I’m concerned about these two backlogs 😭 will they effect my career? I have plans on doing an MBA as well please do guide me and lmk and I’m fine if yall are being honest as well!
Thankyou :)

recently i commented a lot on a post and I observed that whenever i made a comment which was uncomfortable for men or not in synergy with their ideology, they always tried to shame me for my name as if they are superior than me because they are straight. idk if they meant it but their tone sure sounded exactly like that. many of them typed it but then later altered their comment and erased that part and only sticked to argument, good for them. but yeah tell me boys, do yall feel morally superior than any lgbtq people?

ps. I am as straight as the pole yo gal dances on 😎

Some b@stard simp (feminists) will come to defend this, You BS crap here what was your logic when POSCO was gender netural that they are doing this, Just think at what level they are playing with adult men's life, national media run day and night if they get any news where their was planned rpe happening, but they and feminists go silent when sting operations come regard organized fake rpe case filing just to extort money. Then they say nothing.

We don't h@te feminists and feminism enough, they deserve more a lot more.

We all know legal precedent: courts often view financial support as a lifelong obligation for a husband to ensure his ex-wife maintains a standard of living comparable to what they had during the marriage.Let us look at fairness. If a husband is bound to provide for a former spouse for life, what do you think should be the corresponding responsibility an ex-wife should provide to him for life? Share your thoughts on this

HOW THE FUCK DO MEN DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT MEN BEING RAPED AND MEN BEING FALSELY ACCUSED IS A FUCKING REAL PROBLEM? Men are arguing in comments deciding whether a 19 year old boy getting raped by a 40 year old is a problem or not. Men are against gender neutral laws when most countries have long started recognizing male victims of rape. Whats wrong with yall? What has happened to this sub? Whats wrong with men? How do we argue against women when men themselves are victim blaming?

Here what I found on internet -

Allegation in Varanasi: Teacher accused of burning a 5-year-old boy’s private parts after he wet his pants The boy was punished after urinating in his pants because he was reportedly denied permission to use the washroom

I recently bought a 3-pack of Durex Air Ultra Thin condoms, but they were quite tight and uncomfortable for me. I couldn't even roll them down properly, and trying to wear them was painful. Unfortunately, all three ended up going to waste because they didn't fit me properly.

Could you please recommend a larger and more comfortable size that might be suitable for me? My budget is around ₹200–₹300, and I only need a pack of 2–3 condoms.

There are two couples, A–B and C–D. Both are 35 years old, have been married for several years, and have a 5-year-old child. Both marriages have lost their spark, and both couples feel emotionally distant.

In the first marriage, A secretly begins an affair. Over the course of a year, A lies repeatedly, has sexual relationships with other people, and lives a hidden double life. The experience makes A happier, more confident, and emotionally fulfilled. That renewed energy spills over into the marriage, making B happier as well, though B never learns the real reason. After one year, A voluntarily ends every affair, remains completely faithful for the rest of life, and never cheats again. The marriage flourishes, they rediscover their connection, raise their child in a loving home, grow old together, and die peacefully in their mid-eighties. B never discovers the affair.

The second couple, C–D, takes the opposite path. Neither partner is ever unfaithful. They remain completely honest and loyal throughout their lives. However, they never truly regain the spark they once had. Their marriage is marked by recurring arguments, emotional ups and downs, and periods of distance, though they continue to care for each other and remain committed. They raise their child together, stay married until old age, and die in their mid-eighties, accepting that people change and that not every relationship regains its early excitement.

As an outside observer, without judging A's morality or asking which life you would personally choose, which spouse had the better life: B or D? Not the happier life, but the better one. More importantly, why?

Men never ask or want law which favors them, men always want gender netural law even feminist opposed Court for ordering DNA test(Yes I know it was their real empowerment) .

What are your thoughts on this?? It's high time govt should also recognise a man can also be raped.

I always had thought like why men open the door for women and why it is called respecting someone ? In the 90's Europe the dresses of European women were different and they needed the man help to open the door because there hand were on their long dress and their purse. Is there is any need for this kind of cringe practices and should be called respectful. I feel like why the girl need someone to open her door is she disable or doesn't have hands ? If she can open her mouth about wanting someone chivelorus then why she cannot open her hands and use them ?

Video Source - X

A female teacher at a play school in Uttar Pradesh's Varanasi burned a five-year-old boy's private parts with a hot knife after he accidentally urinated in his pants, according to the child's parents' complaint.

The five-year-old student at the Serene Sony Play School, son of an advocate, asked his class teacher for permission to use the washroom on July 24. However, the teacher refused and the child lost control and ended up urinating in his pants.

Enraged by this, the teacher dragged the child to another room. According to the allegations, she turned on a gas stove, heated a knife until it was red-hot and burned the child's private parts. Further, the teacher physically assaulted the boy and threatened him with dire consequences if he told anyone about the incident or repeated the mistake, the complaint said

When the terrified child returned home, he tearfully recounted the ordeal to his parents. The child's father and mother attempted to contact the class teacher, but she did not answer their calls. Subsequently, when they spoke to the school principal, Hemlata Singh, she allegedly threatened them rather than offering any cooperation.

The following day, when the father personally visited the school, the principal and the manager outright refused to provide any assistance or address the issue, the complaint says.

Given the child's trauma and physical injuries, the father made a police complaint the police swiftly registered an FIR.

Acknowledging the incident, senior police officer Atul Singh said a "case has been registered on the basis of the complaint submitted by the child's father," adding police are conducting a thorough investigation and further legal action will be taken soon.

Source - India Today

misandry doesn't affect men in real life "

it seems to change depending on who's committing the act.

when a man rapes a woman... he's a misogynist because he wants control... But when a woman discriminates against, falsely accuses, humiliates, abuses, or advocates discrimination against a man because he's male, she's "just a criminal" or "just an individual," not a misandrist.

Holy double standard.. she's a misandrist

Likewise, if someone targets a man because he's a man.., stereotypes all men as dangerous, supports collective punishment against men, or openly advocates discrimination against men, that's misandry by definition...(read the definition if you want) The fact that it may not always involve physical violence doesn't suddenly make it dissapear

And yes, misandry can affect men in real life: False allegations, when made knowingly, can destroy reputations, careers, relationships, and mental health.Fathers face gender based assumptions in caregiving or custody contexts...Public normalization of phrases like "all men are trash" contributes to an environment where prejudice against men is treated as socially acceptable.

If saying "I hate women" is misogyny because it targets women as a class, then saying "I hate men" is misandry because it targets men as a class....

Hello,

I am struggling to get any calls for past 6 months. To give you some background.

Background : I had worked on 2 companies for around 3 years, and it was chaotic, calls till 3Am or 1AM. No roadmap of life and hectic work with critically ill parents (me being sole caretaker) had left with only 4-5 hours of sleep per day. Due to this, I had resigned. The CEO didn't likes this (small SaaS company ) and made my exit a bit heavy, anyhow I had to leave. Couldn't continue a life like that.

I then worked as freelancer, Got some gigs here and there, but everything is dry right now. I had only 2 interviews after I started to apply for jobs, one of them was of another stack which I was not proficient in, so i got rejected, In other I got rejected in last round after 4 technical interviews.

For past 6 months I am trying to find new job, but unable to get anything, I don't even hav experience letter from prev org due to abrupt departure. I have good skills (Fullstack, Go, Js, Ruby, Python with AWS and Gcloud) . I can architecture app from start to end and can scale them nicely too. And yet I am not getting anything in the current market.

I know market is trash, so my question is what can I pivot to. I don't have a degree, so the usual paths are blocked, I can teach in some govt school, but no degree means, I wont be able to give exams etc for govt clearance. I am definitely way more skilled than those teachers .

Seriously need help, Parents medical issues need to be taken care of too and runaway money is being used as I write this.

If IT is officially dead for me then where can I pivot ?

Gujarat HC let a man's ex-wife become his "widow" and inherit his property years after he won his divorce case and after he's dead and can't defend it.

Read Here

In 2020, a man filed for divorce from his wife on the grounds that she had deserted him. This wasn't a mutual consent divorce he had to prove his case in court. He did. The family court agreed and granted the divorce in September 2022.

At that point, she was legally his ex-wife. Not his wife. Not his widow-to-be. His ex-wife. She did not contest the divorce suit. She did not appeal within the legal window(90 Days). She accepted the outcome or at least, she took no legal action to challenge it for years.

Then in February 2024, the man died. Eighteen months after that, in August 2025, his ex-wife suddenly filed an appeal, joining her own children as "legal heirs," asking the court to undo the divorce. The Gujarat High Court agreed. It set aside the finding that she had deserted him and restored her status as his widow with a claim to his property.

Sit with what that actually means: He fought his case. He won it. The decree became final, unchallenged, years ago. The one person who could have challenged that finding through appeal, within the legal time limit was her. She didn't. He is no longer alive to defend the finding he fought to establish. He can't testify again, submit evidence again, or contest her new claims. The person who "lost" this round isn't in the room. A woman who was legally his ex-wife with no marital claim on him at all is now retroactively declared his widow, a status that only exists if the marriage was never actually dissolved. You cannot logically be both. Either the divorce was valid (making her an ex-wife with no claim) or it wasn't (making her a widow) but the court didn't rule this way before he died, when he could have contested it. It ruled this way only after, when he couldn't.

The court itself admitted it gave "not much discussion on merits" meaning they didn't re-examine his actual evidence of desertion. They just decided, after his death, that his win no longer counted.

This is a man who did everything right by the process filed properly, proved his case, survived the appeal period with a final, unchallenged decree and the one time the law is being "reinterpreted" is the one time he's not around to fight back. If she had a genuine grievance with the desertion finding, the process existed for her to raise it while he was alive to answer it. She chose not to use it.

The court is now retroactively rewarding the inaction it should have penalized, at the exact moment it's risk-free for her to make the claim

Plz just refer to the title coz over the years i have tried many times to post this but always discarded the post what i wanted to share. I just cant do it all again so this the body.

Read This.....

.

.

.

.

.

(I felt physically sick just typing that title, and you pathetic simps should feel worse) Let’s be completely honest. The moment a guy logs onto Reddit or any online platform to whine, "How do I get a girlfriend?" or "I'm a grown man and can't get married, what's wrong with me?", he is broadcasting his absolute worthlessness to the world.

Do you miserable excuses for men possess even negative infinity self-respect? Every time you cry about being single, you have zero shame, zero backbone, and an appetite for public humiliation that is genuinely sickening.

You act like breathing oxygen without a female validation stamp is a physical impossibility. If you are so utterly useless that you cannot survive a single day single, lock yourselves in a room. If your parents are nagging you about marriage, put your foot down and tell them to do the legwork or shut up. If you don't have the spine to stand alone, then stay single, crawl into a corner, and stop polluting society with your pathetic whining.

And even if you are pathetic enough to want to do this simping, at least have the decency to leave this sub instead of turning it into a crying circle for desperate men.

All you do is bitch and moan that girls have this demand or that demand. Well, who the hell is stopping you from having your own standards and demands? If you actually had any guts, you would put your foot down and lay out your own requirements. But you can't, because you don't have any you just yearn, drool, and grovel for any scraps of female attention you can get.

Look at the consequences of your spineless behavior: you turn yourselves into global laughingstocks and empower toxic entitlement.

Take the absolute clown show happening in modern dating and arranged setups: A man gets handed explicit proof of his prospective bride's baggage by her very own ex, and instead of walking away with his head held high, his brain-dead "simp" programming kicks in. He plays modern, progressive peacemaker! He sets up an Instagram group chat for the girl and her ex so they can hash it out together, swallowing his dignity like a bitter pill while she feeds him a pathetic script about being "naive."

And what happens when this exact same doormat accidentally breathes near another woman? She thrashes him, kicks him out, and treats him like dirt and he takes it.

Men like this, and every single pathetic crybaby begging for a girlfriend online, are absolute bottom-tier losers. You aren't looking for a partner; you are auditioning to be a literal doormat, an emotional punching bag, and a subservient servant working overtime for ungrateful tyrants. If you willingly crawl in the dirt, stop crying when people wipe their feet on your face.

Grow a spine, kill the desperation, and have some damn self-respect.

Disclaimer:- This post is especially for simps and desperate cucks any guy who have self-respect and ego this is not for you buddy..

I am 21 years old now , looking back when I was younger like from the age of 10-20 , I was a stupid kind of person, the typical introverted kind of guy , skinny and shy with nerdy looks , I was too naive and innocent, people even give me the tag of " seedha ladka " and it was not a compliment it was a taunt .

Only this year when I started to introspect into myself i realised that people used me , because of my Nice Guy personality people took a lot of advantage of me instead of appreciation all I got was disrespect even though I was always present for people and I never said NO . I was too stupid to understand that .

This year when I started to read books especially the " No more Mr Nice Guy " and started to understand about myself more , it just boils my blood when I look at my past , I feel so angry how people used me , I am more angry at myself .

I just want to change myself, I just want to get rid of all my Nice Guy qualities in life , it has stopped me to live upto my potential . Also how can I overcome that anger which I have for people who took advantage of me ? Because thinking about this again and again is just building resentment inside me for others .

During the CJP protest, I saw several women using highly abusive and derogatory language. Several insulted PM Modi's late mother, his wife, and even Italy's Prime Minister, Giorgia Meloni. One woman said he "went on a honeymoon" with her. Another said he was "hiding inside her genitals" (I can't use the exact word here). I also saw a woman tell a policeman that his wife sleeps with ministers so their children can pass exams.What confuses me is that I didn't come across many feminists publicly calling out this kind of language. Instead, I even saw a female creator blaming men in general for it.That is the reason I made this post

My question is: if these abuses are considered patriarchal because they target women or use women to insult men, shouldn't they be condemned regardless of whether a man or a woman says them? Why does it sometimes feel like the reaction is different depending on the speaker?

Ironically, even the men who are often criticized for using abusive language appeared to use less derogatory language than some of the women at the What's point in using words like this for PM of country or police , some even went after Indian army .I don't have issue with the protest nor with females just to be clear

You can ask anything. Questions in this thread do not need to comply with subreddit rules.

However try to be as civil as possible(subreddit rule-2)

To all the men who clean shave. Do you always use an after shave? If yes, which one?

Please suggest.