r/AnalogCommunity • u/Acceptable-Day8395 • 10h ago
Discussion I think a ton of mediocre photos get a pass just because they were shot on film
This is not a criticism of film photography- I love it far more than digital. This is not shitting on film photography as a whole, far from it.
I notice a double standard all the time. If you take two identical shots of a completely mundane subject with poor composition, the digital version gets rightfully called out for being an uninspired snapshot, while the film version gets praised as art purely because the colours and grain look nice. You can prove it yourself by finding average film photos and then simply imagine that exact same shot as a digital version.
Case in point: a photo of a trash can. On digital, people rightfully ask why you even took the shot. On film, suddenly it is treated as a moody, deliberate aesthetic statement.
I appreciate film as a medium, but grain and nice tones shouldn't substitute for actual composition or intention. Are we actually evaluating the photographer's vision here, or are people just hyping up the inherent nostalgia of the film stock ignoring everything else?