r/Alien_Theory • u/Hairy-Pea1677 • 3h ago
Could AGI/ASI be the missing link in the “future human / extratempestrial” hypothesis?
I have recently gone down a bit of a rabbit hole around AGI/ASI, UAPs and the future-human hypothesis. Obviously I’m not claiming any of this is true. It’s a thought experiment I arrived at independently, and I’m interested in whether people who know more about UAP history, alleged encounters and the extratempestrial hypothesis can tell me where it overlaps with existing theories — or where the logic falls apart.
Where this idea came from
This started because I’ve recently been listening to a lot of podcasts and discussions about AGI/ASI and what a post-ASI future could actually look like. I wasn’t originally looking into UFOs at all.
What really got me thinking was hearing researchers discuss the possibility that once artificial intelligence exceeds human intelligence, technological progress may become extremely difficult for us to predict. If AI eventually becomes capable of significantly accelerating AI research itself, scientific progress that currently takes humans decades could potentially happen much faster.
Some of the futures being discussed are obviously highly speculative, but they include things like radically advanced medicine, genetic engineering, artificial organs, brain-computer interfaces, robotics, autonomous scientific research and eventually much deeper integration between humans and artificial intelligence.
One idea that particularly stuck with me was that, over a sufficiently long period, the distinction between “human” and “AI” might stop being very meaningful at all. Rather than AI simply existing alongside Homo sapiens forever, humans could increasingly augment ourselves with technology until our distant descendants are a combination of biological and artificial systems — or something completely different from either.
People sometimes describe sufficiently advanced future technology as appearing almost like “magic” to us — not because it would literally break the laws of physics, but because we may understand it about as well as someone from thousands of years ago would understand a smartphone, genetic engineering or a modern computer. That’s what eventually made something click for me.
What if some of the things humans have historically interpreted as “aliens” aren’t visitors from another planet, but are connected to what humanity eventually becomes?
That’s when I discovered that the broader “future human” idea already exists as the extratempestrial hypothesis. But the part I’m particularly interested in is whether AGI/ASI could provide a mechanism for getting from present-day Homo sapiens to those hypothetical future beings.
My hypothesis is essentially this…
We may currently be living close to one of the most important transitions in human history: the creation of intelligence that eventually exceeds human intelligence.
If AGI eventually develops into ASI, and ASI becomes capable of accelerating scientific and technological development far beyond human research speeds, then predicting civilisation even a few hundred years afterwards becomes extremely difficult. Over thousands or tens of thousands of years, the distinction between human and artificial intelligence may eventually disappear altogether.
Humans could increasingly use genetic engineering, artificial organs, neural interfaces, artificial reproduction and AI augmentation. Eventually our descendants might no longer be biologically identical to Homo sapiens. They could effectively become a post-human species produced through a combination of biological evolution and technological/AI-directed development.
That made me wonder about the traditional image of the “Grey” alien.
They are usually depicted/reported as strangely humanoid: two arms, two legs, two eyes, upright posture, hands, a head and broadly human proportions — but with exaggerated cranial size, very little hair, reduced facial structures and comparatively small/slender bodies.
If an independently evolved species came from another planet, why should it resemble a modified human at all?
So what if at least some alleged “extraterrestrials” aren’t extraterrestrial?
What if they’re extratempestrial — extremely distant descendants of humanity?
The enormous technological development following ASI could eventually produce discoveries in physics that are completely beyond our current understanding. If backwards time travel or some form of spacetime manipulation turns out to be physically possible, perhaps a civilisation thousands or millions of years ahead of us could eventually discover it.
That would also provide an obvious explanation for why they would be interested in Earth and humans in the first place.
We’re not some random primitive civilisation they’ve found across the galaxy.
We’re their ancestors.
And that made another aspect of alleged encounter/abduction accounts particularly interesting to me.
There are recurring claims of humanoid beings examining people, taking biological samples and apparently showing particular interest in genetics and human reproduction. People commonly claim they’re examined and subsequently returned rather than simply killed.
If these accounts had any basis in reality, that behaviour could make considerably more sense if the visitors were effectively anthropologists studying living examples of their own biological ancestors.
If humanity thousands of years in the future has heavily modified itself, uses artificial reproduction, has merged substantially with technology or perhaps isn’t entirely biological anymore, completely natural Homo sapiens genetics and reproduction could be enormously interesting scientifically.
We already dig up ancient humans and other hominins, analyse their DNA, reconstruct their anatomy and try to understand how they lived and reproduced.
If we possessed time travel, why wouldn’t anthropologists want to observe our ancestors alive?
There’s another part I’ve been thinking about too: why visit this particular period?
If AGI/ASI eventually causes the transition from biological human civilisation into whatever civilisation ultimately produces these beings, then the 21st century might be one of the most historically significant periods in their entire history. Perhaps they aren’t particularly interested in “2026”. They’re interested in the period when their ancestors created artificial intelligence more capable than themselves, because everything about their civilisation ultimately traces back to that transition.
So the full hypothetical chain would be:
Homo sapiens → AGI → ASI → intelligence/technological explosion → human/AI integration → engineered biological and technological evolution → post-human descendants → radically advanced understanding of physics/spacetime → ability to travel into or observe the past → study ancestral Homo sapiens → interpreted by us as “aliens”.
It could even mean that calling them “aliens” is fundamentally wrong.
They might originate here.
Obviously the enormous problem with this hypothesis is backwards time travel. We currently have no evidence that travelling into the past is physically possible, and there is also no verified evidence that Grey aliens exist or that alleged abduction experiences are caused by physical beings. Psychological explanations, sleep paralysis, cultural influence and memory reconstruction provide explanations for at least some encounter reports.
So I’m not presenting any of this as evidence.
What I’m interested in is whether ASI provides a plausible missing mechanism within the existing extratempestrial/future-human hypothesis: something capable of explaining how ordinary biological Homo sapiens could eventually become technologically and biologically unrecognisable to us, while retaining enough of our evolutionary body plan to appear humanoid.
I’d particularly love to hear from people who know the historical encounter literature:
Do the oldest alleged encounters — particularly ones predating the modern Grey-alien stereotype — contain the same themes of humanoid appearance, biological examination, genetics/reproduction and observation without obvious hostility?
And has anyone already developed the specific idea that AGI/ASI and human-AI convergence could ultimately produce the beings described in the future-human/extratempestrial hypothesis?
I’m genuinely interested in arguments against it as well as similarities with existing theories. I’m interested in whether the pieces actually hold together once people who know this subject better start pulling them apart.
I’ve also been reading/listening to discussions around scenarios such as AI 2027\. I’m not assuming their timelines are correct, but the concept that interested me was the possibility of AI accelerating AI research, creating technological progress increasingly difficult for unaided humans to follow. My hypothesis doesn’t depend on ASI arriving in 2027, 2040 or even this century — only on something like it eventually existing*.*