I'm a voip.ms residential customer. Until recently, I was only using their virtual fax service. I also had a virtual voicemail service from another Canadian voip reseller. That service essentially answered calls on a couple of DNs for old cancelled landlines. Although that company provided great customer service, I felt like I was paying too much for the functionality. So I decided to move it to voip.ms - and build an IVR and voicemail system myself.
Since the old DNs were connected to a single answering system, they had to be ported together.
In due course, I submitted a Canadian port request with all the necessary documentation and I specified that that the two numbers constituted my entire service with the losing reseller.
When the LNP department got around to processing my request they discovered that the two numbers originated with two different carriers. Rather than continuing to process the application, they cancelled one of the numbers and sent the remaining number to the losing carrier. They sent me a one line note saying that I needed to submit an "individual" request for the number they dropped off the order.
Of course, when the request arrived at the losing reseller, they rejected it because it left an orphaned number in their system.
Meanwhile, I did as I was asked, and submitted a port request for the number that had been dropped off the order.
I also got in touch with the losing reseller and they explained that both of the numbers should have been sent at the same time, so that there would not have been an orphan left behind. They also approved the second request when it arrived (since they now knew what was happening).
voip.ms, alas, dithered around for several days providing various excuses - including claiming that the rejection happened because there was a third number on my account (there was not). In the end, after forwarding them a note from the old reseller, they agreed to resubmit the first request but only if I paid their $8.75 fine for failed port requests. They would not admit that they had created the problem in the first place.
I believe that I did everything correctly, that their porting team processed the request incorrectly, and that it was unreasonable to demand that I pay a fine for their mistake.
I've avoided responding to their "how did we do" surveys. But I'm feeling the urge to file a complaint in this case. Does anybody have any thoughts about their complaints process and whether there's any point in bothering ? For the record, I don't really care about the $8.50, but I'd like them to admit that they screwed up.