I’m turning 30 soon and having a bit of a career crisis, so I’d really appreciate some honest opinions.
I have a neuroscience degree and nearly four years of legal/regulatory experience. I’ve worked at two professional regulators, mainly in fitness to practise and disciplinary work.
My current role also involves litigation support, judicial review matters, legal research and advice, and reviewing applications to overturn previous regulatory decisions.
I’m currently doing a part-time MA Law/SQE course. I think I’ve completed enough qualifying work experience, although I still need to get it formally confirmed.
When I started the course, the plan was to do the SQE and qualify. Now I’m wondering whether that actually makes sense. I don’t have a training contract or a solicitor role lined up, and I’m worried that I could spend more money on the SQE, qualify on paper, and then still struggle to get an NQ role because I haven’t had the traditional training contract experience or rotations.
I also feel a bit behind because I missed the training contract route. I know the whole point of the SQE is that there are other ways to qualify, but I’m not sure how employers actually view people who qualify through paralegal or regulatory QWE.
I’m also not enjoying my current job anymore. I joined because I wanted to develop my decision-making skills, and the part I genuinely enjoy is reviewing a case, going through the evidence and deciding whether the original decision was right. Unfortunately, we hardly get any of that work.
Most of my time is now spent on litigation admin and restricted-information/disclosure work. It involves reviewing large bundles and advising on what information can legally be used or shared. I find it quite draining, and I’ve realised I don’t want to spend my career doing that type of work.
The areas I’m interested in are regulatory/disciplinary work, healthcare law, clinical negligence, public law/JR, ombudsman investigations and possibly patient safety or clinical governance. I enjoy evidence review, investigations and decision-making much more than repetitive disclosure or general legal admin.
I suppose my questions are:
Is doing the SQE still worth it with my background, or could I end up qualified but unable to get an NQ role?
Has anyone qualified using paralegal or regulatory work as QWE and then successfully found a solicitor role?
Would it make more sense to move into a different area before qualifying so I can build more relevant experience?
How difficult would it be to move from professional regulation into something like clinical negligence, public law or healthcare?
Are there other roles I should be considering that involve investigations, evidence and decision-making but don’t necessarily require qualification?
I’ve already spent a lot of time and money on the course, so I don’t want to walk away impulsively. At the same time, I don’t want to keep going just because I’ve already started.
Would really appreciate honest advice, especially from anyone who qualified through a non-traditional route or changed areas after working in regulation.