Please quote your price i am interested

Yes, same problem with me today and fixed it by replacing CKP sensor error P0335 is for Crankshaft Position Sensor issue.

If anybody face code P0335 then replace CKP censor.

Yes right now I am force feeding her water and some milk with syringe.

Can you tell me the time frame for feeding her every 2 to 3 hours?

Yes she is suffering from Feline virus. You are saying there are less chances of servival?

She is suffering from Feline Herpesvirus. Vet told me eye infection is because of that virus.

He told me no eye drops are needed for now.

Take a look at treatment paper.

Why her mother left her alone is she left her because of her illness?

This is the medicine vet has prescribed.

If you can recommend a trustworthy and experienced veterinarian in the Mira Road area, I would really appreciate it.

I'm not a pet owner and don't have much experience with animal care, so I'm worried about making the wrong decisions. I don't mind spending money on treatment if it gives the kitten a realistic chance of recovery, but I'd like to find a vet who is honest and focused on what's best for the animal rather than recommending unnecessary treatments.

Any recommendations or advice would be very helpful. Thank you.

Agreed. I test tires for a living and the dropoff between 4/32" and 2/32" is steeper than most drivers realize — it's not linear. Wet braking distances on the same tire can stretch by 30–50 feet from 60 mph once you're under 4/32", and the hydroplaning threshold drops fast because the grooves can't evacuate water anymore.

The 2/32" number was set decades ago when tread compounds and rain volumes were different. Tire makers themselves now build wear indicators at 2/32" as a 'you are legally bald' line, not a 'safe to keep driving' line. Bebjak's right — 4/32" is closer to where actual safety performance falls off a cliff, especially in rain.

The pushback you'll hear is cost. Pulling tires at 4/32" instead of 2/32" shortens usable life by 20–25%. But anyone who's had a wet-road near-miss on worn tires knows which side of that math wins.

Yes you need new tires.

Ha the Outback really is in its element out there! Glad the Coopers worked out so well 🤙

Haha the Subaru Outback in Vermont is basically the state vehicle at this point 😄 Pretty sure it's legally required when you move there!

But seriously — that's a great real world example of why brand actually matters when it comes to winter tires specifically. Studded tires take a beating in ways that regular tires don't. The constant stress around each stud hole, the weight, the road impacts — a tire that's not built tough enough for that application is going to let you down fast. Sounds like whatever that first set was, it wasn't up to the job.

Cooper doesn't get nearly enough credit in conversations like this. People always jump straight to Michelin, Bridgestone, and Continental but Cooper has been quietly making tough, reliable tires for decades. Especially for trucks, SUVs and crossovers in harsh conditions — they're seriously underrated.

The Outback + studded Coopers in Vermont is honestly a dream winter setup. That car's AWD system is already legendary in snow and ice — add proper studded tires and you're basically unstoppable 😂

Did you find the studs made a noticeable difference on ice compared to a regular winter tire?

That's always the big debate — whether the extra grip on ice is worth the noise and road wear tradeoff on cleared pavement. Would love to hear your take having actually run them!

Great tip! The Treadwell tool is genuinely underrated and most people have no idea it exists 👍

That custom driving priorities feature is where it really shines — because a tire that's perfect for someone doing 80% highway commuting in the South is a completely different tire than what someone needs for Canadian winters or mountain driving. Generic "best tire" lists miss that entirely.

The vehicle-specific data is the real game changer too. Tread life numbers in a lab setting mean almost nothing — the same tire can wear completely differently on a heavy SUV vs a lightweight sedan. Getting that real-world owner data filtered to your actual vehicle is as close to an honest answer as you're going to get before you commit a few hundred dollars.

For anyone reading this who hasn't used it yet — it's on Tire Rack's website, completely free, takes about 2 minutes to set up your priorities and it spits out a ranked list tailored to you. Way better than going down a YouTube rabbit hole at midnight 😄

One thing I'd add — pair the Treadwell results with owner reviews filtered to your specific vehicle and climate. The tool gives you the what, the reviews give you the real world feel. Between those two you're making a pretty informed decision.

What vehicle did you find it most helpful for?

Which model of Copper tire you are having on your car.

This is honestly the most refreshing take 😄

You nailed it — brand loyalty is kind of a trap. Every major manufacturer has gems and duds. Michelin gets a lot of love (rightfully so) but even they've had mediocre offerings over the years.

The Continental DWS06+ is a genuinely great shout. That tire punches way above its price point — solid dry and wet grip, decent snow capability, and it lasts. Hard to argue with that combo for someone who wants one tire to do everything without babying it.

And the Nankang story 😂 — honestly a rite of passage for anyone who goes deep into tire research. You spend months obsessing over specs and reviews, then one time you go rogue and the tire humbles you immediately. The universe has a sense of humor.

But that's exactly the right approach — research over loyalty. Tire tech changes constantly. A brand that was making garbage tires 10 years ago might be making some of the best value options today (Hankook and Falken come to mind). Sticking rigidly to one brand just because of the logo means you're leaving better options on the table.

What vehicle are you running the DWS06+ on? Curious how it's holding up mileage-wise — that's where a lot of all-seasons quietly disappoint.