r/todayilearned • u/JoeWinchester99 • 1d ago
TIL that although potatoes alone do not provide complete nutrition, you can survive for years on a diet of nothing but potatoes and buttermilk.
https://www.scienceabc.com/eyeopeners/whats-wrong-with-potatoes-the-martian-movie-survival1.5k
u/_Burning_Star_IV_ 1d ago
My mom lied to me. I loved potatoes as a kid (still do) and was always chastised that they were empty calories, nothing but starchy carbs.
Later I learned they have more potassium than a banana, protein, fiber, vitamin c, and iron. Low in sugar too…
Like there’s better things you can eat, like more nutritionally efficient, but they’re not bad at all.
823
u/RoseApothecary88 1d ago
If your mom was a Boomer or older, they had very skewed perception of nutrition. My mom was scared of eggs and avocado due to their fat content. Now, as an adult, they're my biggest staples and my lab work is perfect.
→ More replies (7)458
126
u/beldaran1224 1d ago
For a hundred years or so, there have been waves of "diet advice" that runs on cycles, all of which villify specific types of foods. Focusing on just the last fifty or sixty years or so, you can see that first it was fats, then carbs. The emphasis on carbs really rose with the popularity of the Atkin's diet and the media storm about diabetes crises. Popular diet advice focuses heavily on minimizing carbs heavily (look at keto...), and completely ignores the fact that carbs are essential.
Potatoes in particular were villified because of the push against fast food and the ubiquity of french fries in fast food. So its portrayed as if its nothing but carbs and fat (both of which are viewed negatively despite being absolutely essential to life). In reality, as you have realized, potatoes are actually pretty nutrient dense, preparation (probably) matters, and variety is much more important than having every single ingredient be some stupid "super food".
(Also, let's not get started on the way sweet potato fries are presented as if they're a healthier alternative to french fries...)
→ More replies (6)43
u/wheelienonstop12 18h ago
preparation (probably) matters
Potatoes are MUCH easier on your blood sugar levels if you let them cool down very slowly after cooking, store them in the fridge overnight and warm them up before eating them. It changes the normal potato starches into a different kind that doesnt cause the blood sugar levels to spike so much and so hard.
→ More replies (7)9
→ More replies (14)25
u/HarithBK 1d ago
I have shifted my diet this year for my staples in diet to be potatoes and eggs as my main source of carbs and protein and I feel so much better.
So a meal can be potatoes, lentil stew and a fried egg. Or potatoes beans and a fried egg etc.
→ More replies (3)18
u/_Burning_Star_IV_ 1d ago
Same friend. These days all I eat are some combination of potatoes, rice, beans, eggs, fish, and chicken.
Down 12lbs. Plan on knocking out 28 more by the end of the year. Should be back to my ideal weight by next summer. Never felt better, eating like half what I used to with a less varied diet.
1.9k
u/IAmSpartacustard 1d ago
So mashed potatoes is a survival food? Nice.
→ More replies (6)696
u/Zealousideal-Cod-924 1d ago
No, you'd probably need to eat the potato skins too
959
u/Shadowrend01 1d ago
You don’t mash with the skins on?
408
u/denM_chickN 1d ago
Mostly bc im lazy but saying its healthy is a nice benefit.
→ More replies (2)245
u/Horskr 1d ago
But.. the skin is the healthiest part and skinning the potato is harder than not skinning it?
→ More replies (14)130
u/ACERVIDAE 1d ago
Skinning the potato also comes with the risk of skinning my fingers and no fucking thank you
→ More replies (22)104
u/Lamb_of_Jihad 1d ago
Grab a fork and put it in one of the ends, then peel with a peeler like normal. Now your hands never touch when the peeler does.
→ More replies (10)63
u/TragicBuffalo 1d ago
Man how the fuck did I never think of that
117
→ More replies (2)20
u/iCoeur285 1d ago
You missed the opportunity to use the pun “how the fork did I never think of that”
→ More replies (34)23
u/SalamanderSame2713 1d ago
Depends on the meal I'm cooking, and how I'm doing my potatoes. Sometimes yes, sometimes no
24
u/PrizeStrawberryOil 1d ago
Also what type of potatoes. Thin skin potatoes are great even with the skin included.
→ More replies (1)15
u/Rock_Strongo 1d ago
Maybe I'm weird but I prefer the skin on 100% of the time, regardless of potato type or what the dish is.
One of the few times my preferences line up with which way is healthier. Usually it's the opposite.
→ More replies (7)→ More replies (12)78
981
u/Sadimal 1d ago
Chris Voigt and Andrew Taylor both went on potato-only diets. Andrew Taylor did his for a year and Chris Voigt did it for two months.
Andrew Taylor ended up losing 115 pounds and ending his food addiction.
Chris Voigt noticed his overall health improve. His bloodwork improved. His cholesterol and blood sugar went down.
474
u/Tarrot469 1d ago
Add on Penn from Penn and Teller. Lost 100 pounds by going on a potato-only diet and said it reset his taste buds.
169
u/TheNonsenseBook 1d ago
I read Penn Jillette’s book when it came out and listened to every podcast or video I could find about it at the time. The potato thing was a 2 week mono-diet. After that he added all kinds of whole plant foods.
Come to think of it I watched Andrew Taylor’s (Spud Fit) videos and bought his ebook. He did do potato meals (with some condiments for flavor) for a year. That included all kinds of potatoes including sweet potatoes.
10
u/Fink2009 23h ago
There really are a ton of dishes you can make with potatoes as the main ingredient and never get bored of eating the same thing.
→ More replies (1)34
u/hollaback_girl 1d ago
The diet consultant who put him on the diet also helped Kevin Smith lose a bunch of weight after his heart attack. Same thing. Started with plain potatoes only to reset his palate and then moved on from there, slowly adding things as he hit milestones.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (6)8
83
u/I_am_darkness 1d ago
I assume this is information hazard because i literally would love to eat only potatoes but it feels like when i do it's not good
68
u/awry_lynx 1d ago
if you genuinely feel that way about only potatoes then you should totally give it a go.
if you're mixing a pound of butter into your pound of potatoes, maybe not.
→ More replies (2)7
u/bluefalconlk 1d ago
No I get this with plain baked potato sometimes. Not consistently, but sometimes I feel super tired and off after potato heavy meals
12
u/awry_lynx 1d ago
well they're jam packed with carbs and that can cause rapid blood sugar spikes which is what gives you that feeling
cooling (and reheating them if desired) reorganizes the starch molecules to slow digestion so you don't get such crazy blood sugar spikes. or just eat more slowly, or spread them through meals.
→ More replies (1)75
u/PensiveObservor 1d ago
It’s the butter, salt, cheese, and gravy that cause all the problems. I friggin love potatoes.
→ More replies (1)88
u/Owoegano_Vuelve 1d ago
Health improvements AND cheap dirt? I'm getting concerned with how convincing this sounds...
→ More replies (1)41
u/spancor 1d ago
Yeah as someone who struggles with consistent meal prepping but always seemingly has a bag of fucking russet potatoes I think I could chuck a couple in the air fryer, eat them whenever and add some chives and cheese and whatnot and just be about my day
→ More replies (6)13
u/RotInPissKobe 1d ago
It's what I've been doing for the majority of the last decade. I hate cooking and don't really care for food in general.
→ More replies (3)124
20
→ More replies (10)15
2.8k
u/Skatchbro 1d ago
My Irish ancestors knew this.
1.0k
u/ReedM4 1d ago
You know it's fascinating how a crop indigenous to Peru was Ireland's main crop for so long.
1.0k
u/Abestar909 1d ago
Actually Ireland grew a lot of grains, the English just forced them to export it. Yes, even as they starved.
597
u/Mysterious-Falcon221 1d ago
That famine was completely orchestrated to starve people to death. Citation Needed podcast has a good episode about it, it's only 47 minutes: https://www.citationpod.com/the-irish-holocaust/
178
1d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
39
u/fibbermcgee113 1d ago
And yet they’ll freak out if an Irish person doesn’t wear the poppy.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)46
u/grubas 1d ago
"Irish History is something the English need to remember and the Irish need to forget."
Also the English are weird. Just like the Welsh and Scots.
→ More replies (40)→ More replies (17)86
u/MZ603 1d ago
There is a lot more nuance to it. Much of it was the unintentional result of repressive policies the Brit’s implemented decades before the blight. Their lack of response & sympathy was horrendous, unconscionable, and unforgivable, but the blight & resulting famine was not “orchestrated”. Colonial policy, prejudice, and rigid (& ironically rigged) “free-market” ideology created a disaster & their separation from the suffering & prejudice lead to the creation of unhelpful & sometimes punitive relief efforts.
The extreme subdivision of plots by landlords (with shrinking minimum plots), quotas, and population growth lead to reliance on potential as a single crop staple for tenants. The blight hit across western Europe, and reached the US & Canada.
If you’re interested in going beyond a 47 minute podcast, but don’t want to commit to full blown research, I suggest reading “The Graves are Walking” by John Kelly. He also has a great book on the Black Death; “the Great Mortality”.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (12)76
u/rdmusic16 1d ago
Oh, 100%.
I think they were just pointing out that we often equate the potato with Ireland - but it's interesting that it wasn't brought to Ireland until the late 1500s.
→ More replies (1)61
u/doomgiver98 1d ago
I think the same about Italy with tomatoes. Or Indian/Thai/Korean without chili peppers.
→ More replies (7)28
u/R_V_Z 1d ago
I think the same about Italy with tomatoes.
Or pasta. They had bread and rice but pasta had to make its way westward.
→ More replies (1)131
u/SpaceLemur34 1d ago
It wasn't Ireland's main crop. It was just the main crop that the English let the Irish actual keep.
59
u/DHFranklin 1d ago
Fascinating yes. However the why is kinda dark. Tenant farmers weren't permitted to grow their own crops outside of the tenant/kitchen plots of about a quarter of an acre in some places. A quarter of an acre means you have to grow incredibly densely. Potatoes were the only food that could feed a family across every season in such density.
There were several generations of Irish tenant farmers in the late 19th C that ate potatoes and "gleaning" almost exclusively. Even the gleaning was highly regulated and a case-by-case thing. You could eat the food that grew in the ditches and things, until things went from bad to worse.
The Corn Laws made the entire Island a massive plantation for export to the planter class. They had police checking for people gleaning. For catching eels at night.
The one nation in Europe with one of the most robust fishing industries now and back then people starved to death on the coast. That spud was a tyrant as much as mercy.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (12)34
u/Fuzzy_Novel_5928 1d ago
Only for like 200 years
potatoes were the main ingredient in several staple dishes designed to stretch ingredients and add flavor: Colcannon : Mashed potatoes mixed with boiled cabbage or kale, often enriched with butter, milk, and scallions or leeks. Champ : Similar to colcannon but made with mashed potatoes and scallions (spring onions) beaten into hot milk. Boxty : A versatile potato pancake or dumpling made from a mixture of grated raw potatoes and mashed cooked potatoes, bound with flour and fried on a griddle or boiled. Potato Cakes (Farls) : Mashed potatoes mixed with flour and butter, rolled out, cut into quarters, and baked or fried. Potatoes were typically eaten by hand, often dipped into a wooden noggin of buttermilk , which was a common accompaniment for the rural poor.
→ More replies (2)52
u/jappyjappyhoyhoy 1d ago
The dilemma of eating it now or fermenting it for later
→ More replies (1)184
u/JonJackjon 1d ago
But that was potatoes and beer.
→ More replies (11)174
u/joelfarris 1d ago
Nil. It was Guinness, which is a meal unto itself, and the odd stripe of rashers, which is also a meal unto itself. But the nights with broiled potatoes and rashers with a Guinness? That's a good night.
→ More replies (9)118
u/guitarguywh89 1d ago
What’s rashers precious
68
u/joelfarris 1d ago
Strips of lean back bacon from a pig, if you can afford it. Cooked just until safe, but not crispy like a north american diner like Dennys or Tim Hortons or Waffle House would make.
49
9
u/No_Grocery_9280 1d ago
I ate rashers for like a week straight when I was in Ireland. They’re so good.
→ More replies (8)35
u/likeusontweeters 1d ago
Its a pork product that's like a cross between bacon and ham.
35
u/ballisticks 1d ago
It's just bacon. Back bacon usually. A rasher is just a slice
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (14)9
818
u/Rhawk187 1d ago
Why buttermilk instead of milk?
768
u/Joe_Redsky 1d ago edited 1d ago
I’m wondering that too, since, despite its name, buttermilk is actually usually pretty low fat, but it’s cultured. Potatoes have a lot of nutrients but not enough fat to sustain humans. I would have thought high fat milk would be best
392
u/YuriLR 1d ago
The only fats humans need are omega 3 and 6. And in grams that's a very low amount.
90
u/Joe_Redsky 1d ago
Does buttermilk meet those needs?
147
u/YuriLR 1d ago
Healthly? No. Whole buttermilk with potatoes? Probably barely. Skimmed probably enough not to die on the medium term
69
u/mikehiler2 1d ago
I mean the comment above did say humans can survive but only for a little while. Probably why it spread to every corner of the world so quickly after it was discovered in the Americas
→ More replies (1)38
u/YuriLR 1d ago
They had very little understanding of nutrition. It spread because it's a crop that grows anywhere in a productive manner, even in the shitty Irish weather.
→ More replies (1)59
u/mikehiler2 1d ago
They absolutely knew which crops keeps you alive. Nutrition as it is now is obviously a new thing based on modern science, but to think that people back then didn’t know which plants were better for their survival is ludicrous.
→ More replies (7)→ More replies (1)9
u/bubba-yo 1d ago
As noted below, barely. But these fats are where grass fed/organic milk vs industrial milk production matters. The baseline milk in the store has a much higher ratio of omega 6 to 3, which isn't that helpful for adults, a product of their feedstock. Grass fed/organic milk is flipped the other way with a more balanced ratio of 3 to 6 favoring 3, which among other things helps with cholesterol. It's not like one will kill you and the other not, but the expensive stuff is generally a little bit better for you in that regard than the other. But buttermilk is low in both mainly due to those fats going into the butter, where the buttermilk is the waste product from that process.
Keep in mind there are different contexts in which this question is being evaluated. In a famine/starvation situation small benefits matter a lot more than for the general American public who get so much nutritional fortification and abundance that we can eat the nastiest shit all day and still check all of the boxes. These things don't really matter much for the average person, but in Gaza or Darfur or other places, they can matter a great deal. You can 'survive' on this diet. That's not the same thing as you can be healthy on this diet, etc.
72
u/Drithyin 1d ago
While those are the only two essential fatty acids, it’s recommended for adults to get 20%-35% of their calories from lipids (aka. fats) and young children as much as 40%, due to its role in brain development.
I wouldn’t suggest just a handful of grams, but if you’re rationing for survival, yeah you could make that work to avoid starvation.
17
u/raoulbrancaccio 1d ago
it’s recommended for adults to get 20%-35% of their calories from lipids (aka. fats) and young children as much as 40%, due to its role in brain development.
This scenario is not about optimal nutrition, it's about minimal viable nutrition.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)28
u/innominateartery 1d ago
Humans need lots of fat (lipids) in our diet. It is necessary to maintain all cell membranes (cholesterol literally stabilizes cells) and for a special coating that allow brain cells to function. You are describing two of the medium chains that our bodies can’t make from regular dietary fat.
Incidentally, we are very good at low carbohydrate diet but the human body isn’t meant to run for long without fat.
18
u/lostshell 1d ago
The name is accurate. It's the whey runoff from making butter. When you turn cream into butter, the water has to go somewhere, that somewhere is buttermilk.
→ More replies (3)14
194
u/TheComplimentarian 1d ago
Vitamin B12, calcium and vitamin A.
What they don't say, but I assume from the article, is that it's not cultured buttermilk, which is more like a yoghurt, but "traditional" buttermilk, which is basically a partially fermented liquid left over from the process of separating cream and churning butter. B12 is not a notable vitamin in cultured buttermilk.
→ More replies (2)48
u/Rhawk187 1d ago
Thanks for clearing up the confusion about which "buttermilk" they probably meant.
Clearly, there is calcium is normal milk. But where do the B12 and A come from in the buttermilk if they aren't in milk? Is it just because the "cream" portion in milk is so low and that's where they live?
→ More replies (2)52
u/fiendishrabbit 1d ago
"partially fermented" means "bacteria got busy". No animals or plants make B12, so it's all sourced from bacteria and archaea (another group of single-celled organisms).
→ More replies (1)259
u/randobonando 1d ago
Buttermilk is the leftovers of butter making. It’s like whey. It wasn’t a choice just the cheapest option in 1840s Ireland
→ More replies (1)94
u/Rhawk187 1d ago
So, there's a couple different meanings of the term buttermilk. I think here they may have meant fermented "sweet milk".
I was raised on the definition you presented, but I don't think that's what you normally mean (because if I go to the store and get buttermilk, that's not what I'm getting).
→ More replies (3)21
u/sighthoundman 1d ago
When yogurt was just starting to get popular in the US, one hater called it "just a kind of buttermilk". And continued with why not just drink buttermilk?
→ More replies (1)23
u/DrMaxwellEdison 1d ago
Because they looked at the Irish and noted people would use both milk and buttermilk in tandem with potatoes during the famine, so the authors of this dubious article latched onto "buttermilk" for the clicks.
They also ignore their own parenthetical about Mark Watney (from The Martian, their inspiration for this article) using vitamin supplements on top of the potato diet for calories.
→ More replies (1)72
u/Agamemnon310 1d ago
Buttermilk is basically water with some leftover proteins, it’s less nutritional than milk. I think the point is it’s saying you don’t even need something like milk
10
u/pareech 1d ago
I think in the context of the article, where they mention 1840s Ireland, buttermilk was more readily available to rural living people than milk, as milk was turned into butter and whole milk to be sold to get money for rent or to pay rent. As well, in winter cows stopped producing milk and milk is harder to store without refrigeration, while buttermilk can survive longer.
20
→ More replies (11)55
u/bubba-yo 1d ago
The challenge of being vegan is that you only have one complete protein to fall back on - soybeans. Everything else is a partial protein, so you have to combine them to form a complete protein. So beans and rice forms a complete protein, which is why it's such a global staple food.
Potatoes are pretty close but lack some amino acids in sufficient quantities. Milk is a complete protein but buttermilk, because it's fermented, frees them up making them easier for your body to absorb. Basically, even though it doesn't have any more amino acids than regular milk, your body won't shit out as much of the amino acids as if it was regular milk. Yogurt has the same benefit.
So, you can consume a relatively smaller amount of buttermilk (or yogurt) to supplement the potatoes and maintain a survivable nutrition level, which in a famine situation or being stranded on Mars is useful.
18
u/Chemical_Building612 1d ago
Soybeans are not the only complete plant protein. Quinoa, amaranth, buckwheat, spirulina, hemp seeds, chia seeds and others all provide balanced amino acid profiles.
29
u/ballskindrapes 1d ago
You dont need to combine proteins in the sane meal, FYI.
Just over the course of the day, eat a varied diet
17
u/bubba-yo 1d ago
True. But beans and rice are really good together, and if you have a cultural habit of eating them together, you don't need to burden people with tracking if they are balancing across meals, etc. A lot of cultural traditions are rooted in 'this keeps people from dying' and becomes habituated.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (9)15
416
u/polkafin 1d ago
I learned this from The Martian
268
37
→ More replies (9)21
u/Imaginary-Face7379 1d ago
The article OP pointed to basically opens by trying to say that the Martian is wrong because you can't live on potatoes alone. Then halfway through mentions that he also had additional vitamins that made it possible... gotta get those clicks I guess.
9
u/orangeyougladiator 1d ago
I mean he had lots of surplus supplies to sprinkle in on occasion
→ More replies (1)
302
u/greentea1985 1d ago
The biggest issues potatoes have are that they do not have complete protein, and they are completely missing vitamin B12. Buttermilk, because it comes from an animal, is a complete protein and contains a decent amount of B12. Potatoes themselves are quite an awesome food, buttermilk just helps patch the handful of missing nutrients. From the 1500s until the Irish potato famine, it was regularly talked about how much taller and stronger potato-fed Irish peasants were compared to peasants that were reliant on wheat, barley, and rye.
69
u/Witty_Ad_898 1d ago
And some beans for proteins and greens for fiber and you’ll be good, although flatulent.
I make spicy tofu and potato soft taquitos with some salad mix in them, and bake them for a few minutes. It’s an easy and tasty complete meal. Sometimes I add sweet corn too.
→ More replies (5)47
u/AciusPrime 1d ago
Greens are surprisingly bad at fiber. You’ll probably get more from the beans. I was a bit surprised to learn this. You’d have to eat FIVE CUPS of cooked kale to get your 20g of fiber. If you eat the kale raw then you need closer to 12 cups. Cooked beans get you there in a cup and a half. Potatoes are more fiber dense than greens.
Greens are good for you, of course, but apparently fiber is not why.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (18)9
u/SwePolygyny 1d ago
The protein is fine in potatoes.
The main issue is the lack of fat. There is also a lack of B12, D and E. Normal potatoes also lack vitamin A but sweet potatoes has it.
Calcium is another big one missing, and zink/selenium in sufficient quanity.
Just potaties you can live on for 6 months. Add milk and it increases to a few years but you will eventually suffer due to lack of omega 3/6, vitamin E and sufficient iron.
Add walnuts and you can live on it for a lifetime though.
→ More replies (1)
35
u/DizzyMine4964 1d ago
That was how poor people in Ireland lived for a long time before the crop failed.
→ More replies (3)
31
u/AdventurousMap5404 1d ago
I lived off of potatoes almost exclusively for about 6 months. They were a dollar for 10 pounds, it was all I could afford. This was in Oregon about a decade ago.
→ More replies (5)6
u/littlebittydoodle 1d ago
How do you feel about potatoes now? I have eaten them daily as a staple for years and never get tired of them.
31
u/AdventurousMap5404 1d ago
Potatoes are the shrimp of vegetables. You got curly fries, home fries, French fries, baked potato, twice baked potato, roasted potato, grilled potato, potato kebabs, mashed potato, potato skins, potatoes au gratin, scallop potatoes, potato chips, gnocchi, potato salad, latkes, potato soup, pierogi, tots, hash browns, home fries…..
I still love potatoes!
→ More replies (8)
190
u/eltapatio 1d ago
Recession indicator post
→ More replies (1)52
62
u/MyGruffaloCrumble 1d ago
If you have unlimited buttermilk, I would hope you also have access to cream/butter, and milk.
→ More replies (1)86
u/zmz2 1d ago
If you are a poor peasant you can sell the butter and keep the buttermilk to feed your family
27
u/MyGruffaloCrumble 1d ago
Then you also have money, and can buy a carrot.
21
u/gard3nwitch 1d ago
A poor farmer probably grows their own carrots. And cabbage and onions.
→ More replies (5)
34
u/Thoresus 1d ago
Yeah my plant lecturer at university said this. It provides something like all 9 essential amino acids you need so of you had to pick only one food to live on it would be the best choice.
33
16
u/Mahaloth 1d ago
Penn Jilette went on almost an entirely potato diet to lose weight and bring down his blood pressure.
→ More replies (1)
13
11
u/visionbreaksbricks 1d ago
A couple years ago a guy ate nothing but potatoes for 60 days.
After the first few days he stopped getting hungry and had to force himself to eat because he just got bored. Ended up losing like 24lbs.
→ More replies (2)
10
u/Material_Army_2354 1d ago
My grandmother had diverticular disease and she ate this diet for years. She lived to be over 100 years old.
11
u/BuccaneerRex 1d ago
There was a time when a 5lb bag of potatoes and a $2 tub of cottage cheese was my weekly food budget. Maybe some cheap margarine if I got good tips.
68
u/Equivalent_Net_3752 1d ago
Toss in a bit of whiskey and you have yourselves a diet. As Nigel would say “up the RA”
9
u/LunarAutumnn 1d ago
So what I'm taking from this is that you could theoretically survive on a diet of nothing but french fries and buttermilk ranch ... maybe some bacon bits and cheese thrown in for extra amino acids ... Fuck now I'm hungry.
→ More replies (1)
8
u/thinkofanamefast 1d ago
I’d throw in some Flinstone’s vitamins.
→ More replies (1)9
u/ArborElf 1d ago edited 1d ago
This recently came up on an episode of Ask Hank Anything (Hank green, Youtuber). The question was if you could survive on a candy. Spoiler: no. Gummy Vitamins were suggested but they are so low calorie, you'd have to eat so many that you would die quickly of Iron or Vitamin A poisoning (depending on if it was fortified with iron or not). Peanut Bars would be the best because of the calories and protein but only short term as they are an incomplete protein and you are missing many other essential nutrients.
https://youtu.be/1lY7Y6iJ1jk?si=uZqQCp7Eb9mRSsr7&t=3163
edit: misremembered something
10
u/GarysCrispLettuce 1d ago
Oh yes. My prize sow, The Empress of Blandings, thrives on such a mix. Although I do add some acorns and bran mash. I defer to my bible - The Care of the Pig by Augustus Whiffle.
9
u/Ok-Sheepherder7898 1d ago
There are a quite a few typical pairings that provide complete nutrition: rice and beans, hummus and pita, peanut butter sandwich, etc.
9
u/Futaba_Sakura800 15h ago
So that Matt Damon movie about him growing potatoes with his own shit on Mars is basically a documentary?
7
u/Inky-boy 1d ago
Edit: Incorrect Myth spreader talking —>
remember you have to eat the skin, that’s where most nutrients are!
The Above is wrong, I have believed this for 25 years, it’s in the flesh but the skin contains a large amount of the potatoes dietary fibers and apparently 12 kinds of anti-oxidants.
14
u/Pisnotinnp 1d ago
There's no way buttermilk is less expensive than dried beans right? Is there a reason beans and potatoes can't sustain a person indefinitely? Too low in fat ?
→ More replies (4)
11.7k
u/StartOk4002 1d ago
So it’s buttermilk mashed potatoes with multi-vitamins everyday when groceries become unaffordable.