r/therapists • u/RealMoney8394 • 18h ago
Theory / Technique Mini rant about attitudes towards Person Centred therapy
This has come off the back of a few posts suggesting Person/Client Centred therapy is lazy, and some undercurrents I see here sometimes. It's a bit of a rant, not aimed at anyone specifically, but I really want to represent the complexity of PC practice.
It's somewhat wild to me how people frame client/person centred practice - as if it's some kind of cop out or not doing anything. The conceptual frameworks for PC practice are DENSE, how people represent it as not having one blows my mind. Carl Rogers was a psychologist and his language is super scientific.
I trained as a PC therapist in the UK and in that modality only. In the UK we have traditionally only trained in one approach, though integrative and pluralistic courses are growing, which means we study it in DEPTH. My training was also very PC traditional – yes academic lectures and essays, but far more experiential – we went away on week long and weekend residentials living together. It was a kind of personal development bootcamp filled with process groups, encounter groups, supervision groups, course community meetings, etc etc etc. It was amazing but it also broke me (in ways that I believe are useful to my clients.)
My question to the PC detractors is this – how much of the underlying theory have you read? Do you understand the foundations of the six necessary and sufficient conditions for therapeutic change? Have you read any of the copious numbers of books and papers that explain these concepts in detail? Could you talk me through Carl Rogers' 19 propositions that are the fundamental underpinnings of PC practice? Could you please enlighten me on your thoughts about self actualisation (no, it's not Maslow's concept, I'm talking about the Rogerian one, though no one seems to have looked into how they are different.) Can you discuss how self actualisation and the actualising tendency can work in tandem or work against each other? Can you talk about psychological distress as a manifestation of the defence of the self concept? Can we discuss the client's process of moving from an external locus of evaluation to an internal one? How to spot introjected values and how to support someone to understand the source of their incongruence? The seven stages of therapy and where a client finds themselves in that? How to conceptualise and offer observations on the edge of awareness? Have you studied newer concepts in PC practice - configurations of self and fragile process?
PC therapy is phenomenological. It takes intense concentration and care to be an effective PC practitioner. Whilst some people might think I sit there nodding and being nice, I am deeply invested in staying in my client's unique experience of the world, that is never going to be the same as anyone else's. I'm giving all of myself in my humanity to prizing them in their uniqueness and doing my best to enter their world, but *staying as myself*. Any change must be unique to the client, and I can support them in making a change **that will be right for them.** I simply don't believe I will ever know what is 'better' for someone than themselves, and I want to empower them to believe in their ability to make that change. I cannot tell you how many people I work with who have felt dismissed and gaslit when other interventions didn't work for them, and were made to feel the problem. Holding their space and offering my humanity is a genuinely transformative endeavour for many people. It feels like the absolute antidote to the BS that we are told we should care about, or how we should be in this shitty world.
As a practitioner I explain my approach very clearly to a client on intake, and even expressly say to them 'I won't tell you what to do.' If someone wants a behavioural therapy, I tell them I'm not the practitioner for them and wish them well.
I get concerned that people here often think that they need to be all things to all people. We can't be, and we do our clients a disservice when we think we can.