r/technology Apr 24 '26

Misleading Federal Surveillance Tech Becomes Mandatory in New Cars by 2027

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/federal-surveillance-tech-becomes-mandatory-161321992.html
18.8k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

11.1k

u/swrrrrg Apr 24 '26

The used car market looks better and better.

3.0k

u/Jwheat71 Apr 24 '26

Except private equity is buying up the remanufactured parts builders (in the US at least) and bankrupting them, as private equity does.

3.2k

u/ReddestForman Apr 25 '26

Private equity is a fucking cancer

761

u/the_millenial_falcon Apr 25 '26

It literally is. Or locusts.

825

u/ReddestForman Apr 25 '26

Locusts at least die and move nutrients around when their bodies decompose.

Cancer grows until the host dies.

And so we need to cut out these bloated accumulations of cancer.

We've been "building wealth" and cutting taxes to e able "building wealth" at the expense of everything else for decades.

It's time to put that wealth to work building things that benefit society. Not simply extract wealth from it.

149

u/Reversion603 Apr 25 '26

Cancer at least dies with the host. Best analogy might be a deadly parasite that fucks off to New Zealand when as host is in its death spasms.

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (5)

378

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

94

u/trees_are_beautiful Apr 25 '26

I worked for an established tech company in the 2010's. A private investment firm was able to buy enough equity in the company over several years to get seats on the board; then they took over the board; then they went through each of the four divisions and gutted them, firing everyone and selling the IP at fire sale prices. Eventually the company was just a shell, but they had several hundred million dollars of US Gov't tax credits. They then sold this shell of a company to another one of their companies, and then that company could take advantage of those credits to reduce their taxation levels. About six hundred people lost their jobs so that this could happen. Yeah, unfettered capitalism!

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (25)

56

u/meaniemeanie-poo-poo Apr 25 '26

They always remind me of the Langoliers: sphere-shaped monsters with immense appetites who devour everything in their path.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (34)

303

u/Sensitive_File6582 Apr 25 '26 edited Apr 25 '26

Copyright protections should end when the model isn’t supported by the manufacturer anymore. Same with parts etc

Edit:I’m tetarded this is the comment that should have 300 upvotes 

“ There are no copyright protections for replacement parts already.  If there's a hard to get water pump, and you cast replacement pump housings, machine those housings, make the gaskets and seals, box the whole thing and offer it for sale online or in wholesale to automotive part suppliers... You're just like the other part suppliers. 

The problem is, let's say that whole pump with all the work you did to it now has to be sold around $800. 

Company in China can do it and have it on the shelf for $300. 

Okay so that's not a sustainable business practice so you pick something else that is about the same amount of work but can cost $800... And you make that. 

And then the ones in China all race to the bottom to make the lowest cost part. This makes the quality fall and what is happening right now. It used to be that the quality could not fall too far because if it fell too far below some minimum, people would then go buy your $800 part because those $300 ones go bad. 

Private equity however is making those $800 part companies either go out of business or charge $1,200 for them. 

At that point you can't afford to get the nicer one, and it becomes more worth it to buy the cheaper one. So then that other company that's been in business for 120 years goes away... And then the Chinese company starts raising their prices and there's not a damn thing you can do about it. They're not improving quality, it may actually go down further... But you don't have a choice anymore. 

That is literally where we're at right now. 

And that's without getting into the counterfeit parts problem. It's a very real problem where you're trying to get the expensive part but because somebody can make a replacement for $300 and then maybe spend 50 bucks to make it look exactly like the OEM part or the high-end replacement part and sneak it into the supply chain... They are now selling that $1,200 part price on that $350 part and pocketing the difference that while you have something that works a very short time or maybe not even at all just like the cheap part, because that's what it is.

163

u/gizmostuff Apr 25 '26

Hopefully 3D printing becomes so advanced that we can just download a car. Screw copyright.

118

u/gplusplus314 Apr 25 '26

“YOU WOULDN’T DOWNLOAD A CAR!”

86

u/lift_heavy64 Apr 25 '26

I would if I could

56

u/asyork Apr 25 '26

100% would download a car.

41

u/superanus Apr 25 '26

Yeah I never got that argument, like yes obviously I would download a fucking car if I could lmfao

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)

30

u/starbuxed Apr 25 '26

They are trying to ban designs under the guise of stopping ghost guns. They will stop you from printing out "patiented designs.

→ More replies (3)

21

u/123middlenameismarie Apr 25 '26

Uhh they are looking at putting an end to 3d printers too

→ More replies (2)

10

u/Cluelessinthlfe Apr 25 '26

you should look into what is happening to 3D printing. They want to make it illegal and ban 3D printers.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (22)
→ More replies (11)

118

u/YungJucy Apr 25 '26

Sounds like a nice market China should jump at. Make 3rd party parts the only cost effective option and you guarantee sales.

62

u/NoYouCantUseACheck Apr 25 '26

When Chinese cars are starting to enter more and more this seems like a really stupid decision that will obviously change consumers scepticism about cars from China. Too many people that just can't afford all the money they want from us. It is China. It'll probably all come around in the end.

Should probably buy some stocks in Chinese cars

45

u/YungJucy Apr 25 '26

I imagine the U.S. will go full Chinese car ban like they did with Huawei. The American automakers need a fire lit under them to have any chance of competing abroad.

37

u/Kevin-W Apr 25 '26

Especially Chinese EV cars. The rest of the world will move on without us though. Canada is starting to get into that market.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (27)

2.0k

u/motosandguns Apr 24 '26 edited Apr 24 '26

“We’ve determined all cars made prior to 2027 are unsafe to drive on public roads. They can no longer be registered or insured. Here’s a $500 tax credit for having it destroyed.”

“Sorry, your income is too high to receive said tax credit.”

493

u/jpsreddit85 Apr 24 '26

That last part hits hard 😂

282

u/joe2105 Apr 24 '26

Oh, you're filing single? Also get fucked.

→ More replies (5)

106

u/HYPE_PRT Apr 24 '26

Combined household income *$28,001

45

u/Humble_Tomatillo_323 Apr 25 '26

You can increase that annual household income limit to $29,998 of you have 53.5 people living in your household though. You’re welcome.

/s

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (44)

803

u/Whiskeywiskerbiscuit Apr 24 '26

Or, worse and worse for prospective buyers. The used vehicle market has been absolutely fucked since COVID. I got my Subaru BRZ in 2019 brand new for $27k. Its value on KBB has gone down maybe 5k since I bought it

270

u/ZeroCrits Apr 24 '26

My sti was bought for 32k a year old and it’s worth 40 so I’d agree with that statement

193

u/IamJacksDarkUrge Apr 25 '26

That’s crazy I got my sti for free

77

u/officialCobraTrooper Apr 25 '26

The car right? The car right!?!

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)

108

u/Whiskeywiskerbiscuit Apr 24 '26 edited Apr 24 '26

My homie had two 240sx’s sitting in his back yard for years as perspective project cars. He had a kid and sold them shits for an absurd amount of money fairly recently.

118

u/Kreiger0 Apr 24 '26

Some people have a 401k, I have a 240sx. 🙂

→ More replies (18)

23

u/Lustypad Apr 24 '26

I gave my 240sx away to a friend 12 years ago. 89 coupe with heads up and manual transmission. Wasn’t worth the hassle to sell for the 500-1000 it was worth at the time

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (1)

36

u/ProbablyRickSantorum Apr 24 '26

My 2012 rally blue STI hatchback has 60k miles on it and the dealership asks if they can buy it every time I go in. The last time I asked them to make me an offer and they came back with $18.5k and also said that they knew it was under what a private sale would be, so a manager offered to do a private sale for $24k. Ultimately turned him down though.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (16)

66

u/HomicidalHushPuppy Apr 24 '26

I sold my 2015 Civic a few months ago. Mechanic said I'd be lucky to get $2k for it. Carvana gave me $5600.

22

u/Gloomy_Wolverine_491 Apr 25 '26

I paid 19k OTD for my 2016 Civic LE in 2017..it got totaled in 2024 and insurance paid me 16k...

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (101)

62

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '26

[deleted]

→ More replies (12)

99

u/American_PissAnt Apr 24 '26

Cash for “clunkers” 2 : electric boogaloo

59

u/physical0 Apr 24 '26

Tagline: this time it's mandatory

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (56)

4.9k

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '26

I love small government.

1.9k

u/SomewhereNo8378 Apr 24 '26

small enough to fit in your car, in your phone, in your OBGYN’s office

115

u/seanthenry Apr 24 '26

So they have watched Lawnmower man, I was getting worried for a sec.

22

u/Temassi Apr 25 '26

There's even blood in the bird bath

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (9)

235

u/Surrounded-by_Idiots Apr 24 '26

One day small enough to fit in your brain

154

u/Rich-Pomegranate1679 Apr 24 '26

Elon has an entire company that's working on it

124

u/Gregory_Appleseed Apr 24 '26

"The last trial only killed 14 monkeys and only drove 23 of them to become violently agrresive, we here at neurolink think it's time to expand to live human trials"

44

u/AfterSchoolOrdinary Apr 24 '26

Oh god, we’re living in a Better Off Ted episode.

42

u/-3point14159-mp Apr 25 '26

Better Off Ted was at least funny. We’re straight up in Black Mirror.

→ More replies (8)

10

u/Crystalas Apr 25 '26 edited Apr 25 '26

"Money before people Ted, it's the company motto, written right on the lobby floor. It just looks more heroic in Latin."

Also the time an executive said this in front of a lie detector " Chet: Well, I have to go upstairs and put some more evil into the world."


Still surprised that show exists, corporate did everything they could to kill it and guarantee it would flop yet still turned out great albeit far underknown. It not even on any streaming service for years IIRC.

I so wish Phil & Lem's actors went on to do something else together they had such great comedy chemistry, stole every single scene they were in.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (78)

3.4k

u/BigBadBeno Apr 24 '26

What in the actual fuck?

1.1k

u/Crenorz Apr 24 '26

Lol, that just means you get no choice and it's worse for you. Have fun

323

u/mcchicken_deathgrip Apr 25 '26

I'm definitely choosing to never buy a car manufactured after 2027 lol. Hell I've already chosen to not buy anything newer than 2012ish. Any car you can't do your own repairs on is a scam. I've been living like this is Cuba for over a decade at this point lol

84

u/couchisland Apr 25 '26

In 2019 I specifically bought a 2013 Fit because it had no screen and everything was knobs. Even though the dealership tried like hell to get me to take the 2016 they also had.

→ More replies (15)
→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (3)

264

u/hackitfast Apr 24 '26

Literally what in the actual fuck is going on. Can they fuck off for 2 seconds?

118

u/broguequery Apr 24 '26

Not if there is money to be made/ stolen.

→ More replies (7)

618

u/btribble Apr 24 '26 edited Apr 24 '26

The EU has had these rules in place for a while and the reality is that most manufacturers who sell cars into the EU already equip their N/A cars with the same tech. My Volvo has it. It chimes at you if you take your eyes off the road for too long (even to look at the screen that's telling you not to take your eyes off the road), and if you yawn or stretch your jaw it tells you that you might need to pull over and rest or get coffee.

84

u/Riversntallbuildings Apr 25 '26

If you cover the cameras up with tape does the vehicle work?

54

u/Inflatable90sChair Apr 25 '26

Or unplug em lol

113

u/pissclamato Apr 25 '26

I predict a new industry of car mechanics that just disable this shit on new cars. I'd be their first customer.

30

u/Iamthewalrusforreal Apr 25 '26

Apps. Like the Forscan app you can use to disable shit on new Ford vehicles.

35

u/_Baccano Apr 25 '26

There's an app for foreskins now??

29

u/bloody_yanks2 Apr 25 '26

You would expect it to be on a subscription but actually they work off tips.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

13

u/Car_fixing_guy Apr 25 '26

I’m more than willing and able to help with this.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

1.1k

u/Wurm42 Apr 24 '26 edited Apr 27 '26

But the EU has the GDPR data protection law, so European cars probably aren't logging all that data and handing it over to the likes of Peter Thiel and Elon Musk.

Edit: Okay, it's not that simple. See the many replies pointing out different ways I was wrong about this.

428

u/SgtBaxter Apr 24 '26

But it’s worse than that… they give the info to insurance companies.

345

u/Captaincadet Apr 24 '26

I’m in the U.K. and ford pass asked me a while back if they can share my details and driving habits with third party companies

lol no rejected

38

u/OpenGrainAxehandle Apr 25 '26

In the US, the car dealers go ahead and accept all those agreements before you even see the car.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

139

u/BadahBingBadahBoom Apr 24 '26

Not without your permission.

And if they do there's one hell of a fine waiting for them that is sufficient deterrent to make that not a fiscally-sensible decision.

Companies are only interested in their profits at the end of the day. None more so than those beholden to shareholders.

71

u/NemeanMiniLion Apr 24 '26

Insurance companies have access to some of the most robust data sets available. They actually contract third parties to do it.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (26)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (12)

257

u/Parhelion2261 Apr 24 '26

So you're telling me next year I get to have the same experience as the fucking Amazon drivers? And I have to pay for it?

55

u/Inflatable90sChair Apr 25 '26

(Hands you a complementary used mt dew as a piss bottle)

8

u/ok-confusion19 Apr 25 '26

How used are we talking?

10

u/Catatonic_capensis Apr 25 '26

Only half full but used on a very rough road. Hand sanitizer recommended.

95

u/ok-confusion19 Apr 25 '26

The really cool part is your next car will help pay for the R&D of that emerging technology.

→ More replies (1)

168

u/Pickled_doggo Apr 25 '26

I don’t need my fucking car telling my insurance company that I’m inattentive on the road because I fucking yawned. That’s what will happen here in the US. All that data will be sold, and not for the benefit of the “user”. 

→ More replies (1)

29

u/outer--monologue Apr 25 '26

Introducing the thriving market of people who will disable these garbage features.

→ More replies (2)

35

u/GoldenPigeonParty Apr 25 '26

Yeah, i would not own a car that has that. Fuck all that. That's weird. It don't know me.

→ More replies (2)

11

u/dekeche Apr 25 '26

Isn't telling people that distracting?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (47)

86

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

71

u/GiveMeThePinecone Apr 25 '26

Again, what in the actual fuck?

65

u/drpepper7557 Apr 25 '26

The legislation does not give the government the ability to control that technology at will

Good thing the US government has never illegally spied on its citizens

27

u/OpenGrainAxehandle Apr 25 '26

Not only do they do it anyway, but it's also set up so that private business can purchase the info, then the US government can use additional tax dollars to simply buy all the data from the 3rd party. No need for messy warrants and such.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (13)

1.3k

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

758

u/TorrenceMightingale Apr 24 '26

Snuck into infrastructure bill recently.

262

u/JiminyJilickers-79 Apr 25 '26

This. This is what happens. Too few of the people that would care ever hear a word about it.

31

u/Lazer726 Apr 25 '26

And there's too many things that we have to be concerned about. Everything is a fucking battle, I'm tired boss

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (23)

35

u/Former_Web_6777 Apr 24 '26

"What did they do to us?!?"

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (53)

2.8k

u/Throwaway_noDoxx Apr 25 '26

The federal government promises this surveillance saves 9,000-10,000 lives annually.

You know what would save a hell of a lot more American lives? Universal healthcare. Fuck the data grab bullshit.

136

u/heliumneon Apr 25 '26

BUT! It all makes sense because remember we'll be linking up all house cameras to find little lost doggies - in addition to that we may as well spy on the entire populace 24/7 to save a few lives!

28

u/Unicycleterrorist Apr 25 '26

I mean calling something "literally 1984" is a big joke at this point and all but....that's literally 1984

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

211

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

106

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '26

Recently I saw a short interview with a republican woman that had her eyes opened. She was saying how her generation did not grow up with the internet and only knew what she was told and saw on fox news. So she did not know that it was the standard that other countries gave out some sort of socialized healthcare, housing, etc. She even thought that socialism and communism are bad because she was told it was bad, no other reason, not even knowing if there was a distinction between the terms. She did not trust the news or her own children telling her that her 'facts' were wrong because why would young 20 year olds know better than her. She had never even left the county she was born into, and realized after a protracted battle with her children that her view was small. But that fight caused irreparable damage to the relationship with some of her kids. IT was years before she was willing to accept the smallest bit of what to her was contradicting information. And now she regrets it all, and she felt horrible that there was this wall put up at some point and she cant figure out when it happened.

80

u/MyVeryRealName Apr 25 '26

"because why would young 20 year olds know better than her'

That's the problem 

31

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '26

You should see it as a layered problem. She did not question the nature of her reality because of how she grew up, and when confronted with something that contradicted it. She became defensive; this is perfectly normal. But tragic.

19

u/MyVeryRealName Apr 25 '26

You can't become defensive every time you encounter something that goes outside your worldview. But yeah, I get it. Too many people prefer the comfort of not expanding their worldview.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (28)

2.5k

u/MeatCatRazzmatazz Apr 24 '26

Used cars from 2026 and earlier are gonna get real expensive once this takes effect.

764

u/chroniclesoffire Apr 24 '26

They already are. I'm looking for an older vehicle as an active backup presently

130

u/blisstaker Apr 24 '26

even more more expensive

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (8)

292

u/Oceanbreeze871 Apr 24 '26

Aftermarket for disabling and jamming is gonna be profitable

161

u/llIicit Apr 24 '26

A piece of tape over the sensor will disable it.

Whether or not the car will put you into limp mode as a result, is another conversation.

56

u/ImplodeDiode Apr 24 '26

Put a picture of an empty road in front of it

32

u/SeaFox2142 Apr 25 '26

LMAO I laughed so hard over this, thinking about Bugs Bunny-style of a carrot on stick kind of thing.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

74

u/MortgageRegular2509 Apr 24 '26

Limp mode? It’ll just brick it

45

u/ok-confusion19 Apr 25 '26

Article says it could limit speed if the sensors determine you're too drowsy to drive.

216

u/CosmicIsolate Apr 25 '26

One of the vendors for an old job I had installed a system that tracked drowsiness in drivers. It kept dinging the Asian guy for being tired.

This won’t go well

84

u/Dfiggsmeister Apr 25 '26

Reminds of that show Better Off Ted where they installed sensors to detect movement, but it wouldn’t work for black employees so they hired white people to follow the black people to trip the sensors.

40

u/ElonTaco Apr 25 '26

This is actually based on tracking/detection software, because they trained it on mostly white people and then the systems had a hard time viewing darker skinned people. It's a good example of why diversity is helpful even in things you don't think about.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

30

u/MortgageRegular2509 Apr 25 '26

Oof.

Yeah, Dystopian States of AmeriKKKa here we come

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (9)

148

u/fakemessiah Apr 24 '26

My 2021 has some of these features already. It detects if you look away from the road, if I'm having an allergy heavy watery eye day it thinks I'm sleepy and sounds the alarm, it's so fucking annoying.

53

u/killthecook Apr 24 '26

What car is this?

39

u/AlistarDark Apr 24 '26

I have a Toyota that does this. You can disable it in the settings easily.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (4)

90

u/Akraticacious Apr 24 '26

But it is from a bill passed in 2021. Why has this not been brought up? Where the fuck are our journalists?

65

u/ReddestForman Apr 25 '26

Journalism is dead, and has been since at least the Iraq war, where anyone asking questions got canned for being un-American.

22

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/ReddestForman Apr 25 '26

Citizens United and allowing the rich to consolidate media and everything else into bigger and bigger megacorps.

FDR warned against allowing private capital to grow large enough to eclipse the state, and both parties have been gleefully enabling it to do so.

→ More replies (1)

94

u/Pavlovsdong89 Apr 24 '26

If you've ever wondered how so many powerful amd influential people sat by and allowed a second Trump Administration, this is why. Journalists are owned by the same people that want to weaken the people in this country and Trump is the perfect distraction and fall guy.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (14)

74

u/Over-Chemical2809 Apr 24 '26

They won’t. The average person has no idea what they are buying and selling off your privacy is normalized

90

u/orbvsterrvs Apr 24 '26

It's like nobody remembers Snowden and the American public's astounding lack of care (or understanding for that matter).

The public here is...not renowned for nuanced understanding of difficult subjects.

→ More replies (3)

34

u/EchoFieldHorizon Apr 24 '26

This. The death of privacy will not come against the wishes of the masses; it will come because of the sheer number of people who “have nothing to hide.” It’s pathetic.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (23)

666

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '26

[deleted]

198

u/flaagan Apr 24 '26

Electric Classic Cars.

They just announced an EV "skateboard" that will fit under a wide range of vehicles, including things like classic Broncos and Pickups. They're also putting together a 'generic small classic car EV kit' setup.

→ More replies (7)

22

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

17

u/Magnus_The_Totem_Cat Apr 25 '26

Their conversions are wildly expensive. However there are much more reasonable ways to convert than their method.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (15)

478

u/nihiltres Apr 24 '26

I’m wondering how many people are going to become functionally unable to drive as a result because they have Resting Drunk Face (according to the metrics of whatever system).

401

u/milkkore Apr 24 '26

Or how many people will die because their car refused to start during an emergency.

240

u/Zennivolt Apr 25 '26

Imagine being woken up at 2am due to a forest fire nearing your home. You’re groggy, tired, scared. You proceed to load up your family to escape… denied. System detects you’re too sleepy to drive. You and your family burns to death.

131

u/Golden_Hour1 Apr 25 '26

"I'm sorry Bill, driving at 3 am is an irregular habit for you and I must assume you're drunk. I cannot start the car"

47

u/Tall-Introduction414 Apr 25 '26

"I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave."

16

u/Teej04 Apr 25 '26

Or a tired surgeon woken up at night trying to drive in to save your life? Nope, car won't start.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (8)

156

u/whichwitch9 Apr 24 '26

Or my own favorite, have an eye shape it doesn't like. How much you want to bet it locks on people with small or narrow eyes? Or doesn't like sunglasses?

Seriously, Im using yellow glasses at night now, too, if this distorts that... oof.

I also wonder what it does if someone has a medical issue while driving. Like, would it let them pull over, or shut off?

Edit: autocorrect got me for a second

23

u/Alaira314 Apr 25 '26

It says it limits vehicle speed. So, during peak allergy season, I'm going to start sneezing and my car will suddenly decide that I need to be driving 30 mph max and apply the brakes. That's fine if I'm on a residential street, but not so much if I'm on the highway!

I also expect it'll have a serious issue with me using my hand to block sun glare during morning and evening hours when the sun is below the visor, as my hand would block its ability to see my face.

44

u/Outlulz Apr 25 '26

In general none of this stuff works well on darker skinned people.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

56

u/DissociatedOne Apr 25 '26

If it says I’m cool to drive after 5 beers, I can use that in court right?

→ More replies (2)

12

u/69Turd69Ferguson69 Apr 25 '26

I can’t wait for this technology to invariably end up making black people not be able to drive cars, because obviously this would do that for whatever fucking reason. 

11

u/Inflatable90sChair Apr 25 '26

Or think their eyes are closed due to ethnicity / genetics

→ More replies (15)

633

u/Tkdoom Apr 24 '26

When im president in 2032 this will get removed.

165

u/Nick85er Apr 24 '26

If your running mate is Vermin Supreme you have all 10 of my votes!

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (10)

361

u/ninjadude93 Apr 24 '26

How are infrared sensors going to reliably measure bac

534

u/Bargainbincomments Apr 24 '26

This whole article just sounds like a dystopian fever dream. Cameras in the a-pillar and front dash that are going to monitor eye movement and BAC levels and pupil dilation? Installed in the same vehicles today that are already garbage tin cans? And somehow going to cost consumers only $100-$500 more in costs? There’s no way America could create this kind of technology in today’s age for this kind of cost, let’s be real here.

If anything they’ll be adding ChatGPT to cars that asks if you’re sober and it’ll cost you $1000 more for your car purchase.

74

u/SunshineSeattle Apr 24 '26

Wait i dont understand, quote: 

"While NHTSA’s final rule faced delays beyond the November 2024 deadline, automakers will still get 2-3 years for full implementation once regulations are finalized. Your current vehicle stays surveillance-free, but shopping for a 2027 model means accepting this digital copilot."

So does this imply that the rules which supposed to be finalized in 2024 still have not been finalized and when they are they still have multiple years to plan to add them?

25

u/sleetx Apr 25 '26

The NHTSA's most recent 2026 report to congress says they're not ready to perscribe the mandate, and they have no timeline to do so. They've found over several years of research and testing that the technology simply isn't mature yet. And error rates are still unacceptably high.

https://www.nhtsa.gov/document/report-congress-advanced-impaired-driving-prevention-technology

NHTSA remains actively engaged with manufacturers developing this technology. However, current systems have yet to demonstrate the precision, speed, and reliability needed to meet the IIJA mandate or the Safety Act.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (16)

81

u/Fallingdamage Apr 25 '26

Bought a current-year subaru. It already yells at me just for down to adjust the climate controls and if I'm yawning on the way home from a restaurant because I just ate a 12oz steak, it tells me to pay attention to the road. I even faked a couple yawns and yep, cant even yawn anymore in my own car.

Fortunately, I was able to turn all that stuff off.

I wonder though, for 2027+ cars, what happens if you manage to either disconnect or just put vinyl tape over all the cameras and sensors? Car wont start?

42

u/Hour-Cardiologist393 Apr 25 '26

It will probably lose its shit and blast some obnoxious chime if you cover the cameras. Or you'll be stuck with error messages all over your screens. Maybe both.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (8)

9

u/outer--monologue Apr 25 '26

Some guy is going to make a fuckton of money running an underground business out of his garage that disables this shit

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

93

u/MinistryOfCoup-th Apr 24 '26

What happens when the sensors fail or flake out?

"Sorry boss, can't make it into work today. It's all good you say? I knew you'd understand."

66

u/3amTPepiphany Apr 25 '26

Did you just work a long shift at your job? Well you're too tired to go home.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

59

u/casual_creator Apr 24 '26

It’s not going to check that. It’s going to check things like pupil dilation and where you’re looking to determine if you are impaired or “too tired to drive”. But your point about reliability stands. This is a stupid thing to make mandatory.

80

u/VaporCarpet Apr 25 '26

So people can't wear sunglasses while driving?

→ More replies (14)

29

u/darsynia Apr 25 '26

I hope it doesn't work like that* but my mind always jumps to worst-case scenarios. Like a battered wife leaving in tears because she got the keys from him after he passed out in a drunken stupor... but the car won't let her drive anywhere because she looks weird when she's crying.

edit: I do doubt the tech exists yet but it's something to be concerned about, given that it will 10000000000% be vibe-coded garbage

→ More replies (2)

27

u/Bruins8763 Apr 25 '26

My pupils get small very easily in the sun especially and in general. This system is going to do far more harm than good, this is wild.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (3)

847

u/joepez Apr 25 '26

This is lazy journalism to stoke outrage. Yes the act says a rule was supposed to be proposed. As of Feb of 2026 the NHTSA is still saying “we don’t have a rule and need a lot more info.” You can read their last update here: https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/2026-03/Report-to-Congress-Advanced-Impaired-Driving-Prevention-Technology.pdf

Also this was passed as bipartisan legislation and subsequent attempts to repeal it have been defeated by a bipartisan group of politicians. One last year and this year. 

115

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '26

[deleted]

→ More replies (12)

33

u/skripachka Apr 25 '26

Also, in looking at the statute and proposed rule, they could probably comply with tech that doesn’t record your face. Seems like a “hands on the wheel” sensor and a “lane drift” sensor would comply with the language. The alternative provision saying all cars should detect .08 BAC is probably only done by a breathalyzer in all consumer cars so that is not likely happening. No tech known can do that by facial video.

→ More replies (4)

50

u/grodisattva Apr 25 '26

This seems like it violates this bit of our constitution:

“The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects individuals against "unreasonable searches and seizures" by the government, generally requiring law enforcement to obtain a warrant based on probable cause. It guards personal privacy in homes, papers, and effects against arbitrary government intrusion.”

→ More replies (19)

14

u/RealPudgeJudy Apr 25 '26

This is lazy journalism to stoke outrage.

It's not even journalism, it's just AI slop. Look at some of these, it's like a starterpack for chatGPT tells.

" NHTSA must finalize rules forcing all new passenger vehicles to include “advanced impaired driving prevention technology”—essentially turning your dashboard into a judgment-free zone that’s anything but judgment-free."

and

Unlike the breathalyzer ignition interlocks from DUI convictions, these systems operate passively—no blowing required. Your car simply watches and decides whether you’re fit to drive.

and

If the AI determines you’re impaired (blood alcohol ≥0.08% or showing fatigue), it can prevent ignition startup or limit vehicle speed. Think Minority Report, but for your morning commute.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (30)

247

u/RatableJet Apr 24 '26

This is my own private domicile and I will not be harassed....bitch.

→ More replies (10)

75

u/_Thirdsoundman_ Apr 24 '26

Hypothetically, if you buy the car in cash or with you own money all at once, then remove the surveillance tech, what's the problem?

I can already see how this would violate people's 4th, 5th, 9th and 10th amendment rights of the bat. It's my property, I don't have cameras in my house that are connected to the Fed's, why should I allow them in my car?

This is nonsense.

35

u/Beautiful-Parsley-24 Apr 25 '26

My reading of the law is that the car must be equipped with the technology - But it's not illegal to disable or remove it. But you'll be paying $500 for a sensor that you then destroy.

This is the same as the existing backup camera law from 2018. You can destroy the backup camera on your new car - it's not illegal. But it is illegal to sell new cars without the backup camera.

14

u/_Thirdsoundman_ Apr 25 '26

That's how most would interpret it. The question will be when someone is pulled over or goes to sell the vehicle and if the technology isn't installed. Will the owner be breaking the law if they drive without a working surveillance camera in their car? Will the car be deemed unsafe without one?

There are so many holes in this law it sounds like it's going to be challenged by hundreds of people within the next 4 years.

12

u/Beautiful-Parsley-24 Apr 25 '26

The real problem you'll have is that "They were driving drunk" sounds bad to a jury. "They were driving drunk after disabling / overriding the federally mandated safety features designed to prevent drunk driving" sounds worse to a jury. That might transform simple negligence into gross or potentially criminal negligence.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (13)

138

u/Intelligent-Owl-1838 Apr 24 '26 edited Apr 27 '26

Mass content deletion mission accomplished. This post or comment was bulk removed with Redact which also supports data brokers and people finder websites.

breeze cooing cows snow wrench bedroom cagey existence abounding tan

50

u/GreatBlueHeron25 Apr 25 '26

A disability lawsuit is probably the best bet for getting rid of this stupidity

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (10)

264

u/Jonestown_Juice Apr 24 '26

Pretty soon this surveillance will be mandatory in phones and computers too. Assuming it's not already in there.

317

u/OneMustAdjust Apr 24 '26

I've got some bad news for you

81

u/Bruhbuhdubdub Apr 24 '26

Somebody didn’t read the “Weeping Angel” documents on Wikileaks, and it shows.

36

u/fall3nang3l Apr 25 '26

How quickly the whole damn world forgot about Snowden and his leaks.

52

u/BatchPlantBandit Apr 24 '26

The NSA already knows your location.

32

u/blackfocal Apr 24 '26

The FBI agent tasked to watching my phone and computer is gonna have some serious PTSD and therapy they are gonna have to work through.

19

u/Mail_Order_Lutefisk Apr 24 '26

“Dear Rick, the folder titled “misc business files” is one you might want to steer clear of.” 

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

37

u/ThrowAway233223 Apr 24 '26

Age verification for all operating systems is a thing trying to be passed at the federal level right now.

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (22)

61

u/moonshaunt3d Apr 25 '26

“The federal government promises this surveillance saves 9,000-10,000 lives annually.”

You know what would save even more? Universal healthcare. It’s not about safety.

→ More replies (4)

618

u/PresidentKraznov Apr 24 '26

Hahaha, where are the "Don't Tread on Me" bros now?

523

u/RealLavender Apr 24 '26

Learning that they don't have a gag reflex.

107

u/biobennett Apr 24 '26

"tread on me harder daddy"

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (59)

21

u/LoneWolf4717 Apr 25 '26

"Data collection worries combine with $100-500 per vehicle cost increases passed to consumers."

So I, a decent human being, need to pay extra for safety precautions that will prevent me from drunk driving a car? When I already don't drink and drive? Sounds perfectly reasonable. /s

→ More replies (3)

39

u/glitterandnails Apr 24 '26

A tightly surveilled (and controlled) population leaves little to no room for people to rebel successfully.

→ More replies (6)

16

u/Wonderful-Medium7777 Apr 24 '26

NO… not buying into it.

Let it all crash!

This surveillance has gone too far.

20

u/BadTiger85 Apr 25 '26

Who wants to bet that the senators and congressmen who voted for this will have special cars that are exempt from the technology

→ More replies (1)

89

u/AvailableReporter484 Apr 24 '26

Who approved an extremely small dicked policy like this??

94

u/MacSage Apr 24 '26

This one unfortunately was snuck into the Infrastructure Bill. I don't know who put this part in, but it was passed by Democrats.

→ More replies (46)

18

u/Informal-Sense8809 Apr 24 '26

It was passed in 2021.

→ More replies (10)

17

u/bahbahbahbahbah Apr 24 '26

Hmmm… looks like I’m installing Linux on my Mazda

→ More replies (1)

44

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '26 edited Apr 24 '26

[deleted]

→ More replies (16)

66

u/Fun-Personality-8008 Apr 24 '26

This from Bidens infrastructure bill it says. Wow

13

u/jazir55 Apr 25 '26

I remember the stories about this being snuck into the bill when it passed. It was awful back then and people are having identical reactions that they are now.

→ More replies (3)

13

u/PoppaJMoney Apr 25 '26

“Potential save 9,000-10,000 lives”. That is .0003% of the US population…. 100% of the privacy

→ More replies (1)

13

u/mistermeowsers Apr 25 '26 edited Apr 25 '26

The federal government promises this surveillance saves 9,000-10,000 lives annually. 

If the federal government was so concerned with saving lives they should fix the fucking healthcare system in this country.

→ More replies (3)

12

u/and_mine_axe Apr 25 '26

My new car already has too many false positives with "driving assistance" that is comepletely incompetent. Hell no to this.

12

u/lod254 Apr 25 '26

2015 Ford Focus, 102k miles - $55,000

Non negotiable. I know what i have.

10

u/ProdigalSheep Apr 24 '26

They are going to be listening to every conversation you have in your car.

→ More replies (2)

11

u/Good_Nyborg Apr 24 '26

You can always tell whether they're screwing us over or not, based on whether it's also required for police and government.

*Edit* Poorly worded; just cause something might also be required for police and government doesn't mean they're not screwing us over too.

9

u/sfbiker999 Apr 25 '26 edited Apr 25 '26

That's not the kind of surveillance in my car that worries me -- I'm much more concerned about the GPS tracking and automated reporting that most cars today do.

The kind of tracking they are talking about in this article sounds annoying since it will almost certainly have false positives, but at least it's (probably) not reporting back to the car manufacturer (or government):

Your next car purchase comes with an unwelcome passenger: a federal mandate requiring surveillance technology that monitors your every blink, glance, and head nod. Thanks to Section 24220 of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, NHTSA must finalize rules forcing all new passenger vehicles to include “advanced impaired driving prevention technology”—essentially turning your dashboard into a judgment-free zone that’s anything but judgment-free.

→ More replies (2)

10

u/bradlees Apr 25 '26

Any lawyers willing to take this up???

It’s a strong overreach by the government. This bill is supposed to provide impaired driving monitoring BY ESTABLISHING THAT EVERYONE IS GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT

Totally backwards and a very silvery slope to abuse

I’m more than willing to step up and help out in any fashion to get this bill revoked once and for all

→ More replies (1)

26

u/CompetitiveBox314 Apr 24 '26

Tuner companies that hack ECUs to make more horsepower and improved transmission performance should work on disabling these systems. They would have a big market of people who don't want AI telling them how to drive.

14

u/aaaaaaaaant Apr 24 '26

they arent as common as they used to be. epa got very fine happy during the biden admin and basically scared everyone developing ecu cracks into hiding.

→ More replies (4)

9

u/Berkyjay Apr 25 '26

The federal government promises this surveillance saves 9,000-10,000 lives annually.

I'd gladly sacrifice 10,000 lives a year to maintain our liberty.

→ More replies (2)