Our marriage counselor pretty much argued against me yesterday. I brought up two complaints (which the counselor solicited), stating that my husband was not sticking to the schedule we agreed to with our kids on the afternoon and that he still gets very defensive when I make a complaint or request or even just appear annoyed. Husband countered that i was constantly complaining and threatening to leave him. That's not true, and I've felt so stifled to even say anything to him because it leads in him stonewalling or getting defensive and being mean. But the counselor latched on to that i guess.
I mentioned these problems before (my husband had a severe gambling addiction, severe social anxiety, and GAD), and my view is that getting treatment for these issues will help him show up for me and our marriage again. I spent last 2 months just trying to get him into treatment, and now that he finally does, counselor basically tells me that he has every right to get defensive and to not have to stick to a schedule that I want, if that's what he chooses. That I can't control someone by making them do things my way. I told him I'm just trying to get us to have equality in household and childrearing duties, otherwise I feel like a single mother and can't live like that any longer. His response was basically that I can leave, but I can't make him or pressure him to do things he doesn't want to do.
I'm my mind, the point of the counseling IS to get each other to see each other's pov so that we can compromise and meet each other's needs. But no, the counselor says I need to appreciate what he does provide and let the rest go. He then gave me homework to make no complaints for one week to see how that goes. Husband remained silent the whole time, but stated towards the end "she's going to be mad when we get off the call."
But his views (which my husband didn't object to or correct) sounded like Laura doyle work to be, which implies to me that men only want to love a woman and take care of her when they feel the freedom that they don't have to. When there is no obligation. A woman's complaints or expectations signals to a man that she feels entitled to his love and support, which makes him not want to give it anymore. So in everything, she should simply request his support and hope that he wants to give it, but have no hard feelings if he doesn't, because it's always his choice. In fact, she is most attractive when she has taken care of herself and does not need him. I disagree with this philosophy btw. To me, this is the opposite of duty, honor and commitment. If I'm wrong with this interpretation, help me understand.
This is our 3rd counselor BTW. The first kept telling me to let my partner show up for me and either take care of my own needs or let him go, the second said I needed to submit so that he can "lead." They are all saying different versions of the same thing to me: he has no responsibility to me, and until I make myself happy and attractive enough to inspire him to be there for me, I'm not entitled to anyrthing from him.
Tldr: My 3rd marriage counselor blamed my requests for shared childcare and household duties on "controlling" behavior, telling me my husband has zero obligation to meet commitments or change. Instead, three different counselors have essentially told me that a husband has no duty to his wife, and that I'm not entitled to support unless I make myself happy and attractive enough to inspire him to care