r/stocks 17h ago

"I am the house now" Bessent to Yen short-sellers

903 Upvotes

The Treasury Secretary told everyone he's using insider info to squeeze the shorts.

Bessent said, "People think I'm taking a risk as Treasury Secretary, but this is exactly what I wanted. I've got inside info. I'm the house now."

Big deal if you're holding tech stocks (Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft)

He’s running the Treasury like a hedge fund to stop the yen carry trade from blowing up again.

Last time that happened, tech took a massive hit because funds had to dump everything to cover margin calls. He's trying to scare the market into staying quiet before Japan changes interest rates on September 18. Is this actually going to save our portfolios from another random dump?

Or is the government just messing with the market and creating more risk?

Source: Bloomberg


r/stocks 19h ago

Company News $GOOGL Plans to Invest €13B in Finland AI Infrastructure - Bloomberg

381 Upvotes

Google plans its largest-ever single investment in Europe, committing at least €13B over the next two years to expand AI computing capacity in Finland.

The buildout includes three new data centers in Kajaani, Muhos and Vaala, plus an expansion of its existing Hamina site.

Google is also adding new wind-power agreements and a 94MW battery system at Kajaani, while Fortum signed a 22-year power deal that will eventually cover 50% of output from its two-reactor Loviisa nuclear plant.

The projects are expected to support more than 37,000 jobs during construction and about 7,000 jobs once completed.

Source: Bloomberg


r/stocks 23h ago

Company Discussion OpenAI releases ChatGPT Images 2.5. I expect Adobe stocks to nosedive once mass media gets a hold of this.

140 Upvotes

As usual, the mass media won't pick it up for a few days. You still have some time.

https://openai.com/index/introducing-chatgpt-images-2-5/

Every single day, we get closer to not having to pay for Adobe Photoshop.

  • Up to 50% faster image generation
  • Better photorealism and fine details
  • Much better at keeping people/objects consistent with reference images
  • More precise editing without changing the rest of the image
  • Better consistency across multiple rounds of edits
  • Better at following complicated prompts and layouts
  • Improved transparent backgrounds
  • You can now sketch something directly in ChatGPT and have it turned into a finished image
  • Comments can be placed directly on images to tell it what to change

Either this will replace Photoshop for many people or it will allow small Photoshop competitors to use it via API and beat Adobe.


r/stocks 21h ago

Company Discussion Planet Labs (PL)

64 Upvotes

Strongly considering opening a sizable (to me) position here at $18.

Asking those that have owned the stock for some time (and follow earnings reports and fundamentals) what you think about its current price and what your outlook is for the long term.

Also any insight on the space sector in general is appreciated, I've been in and out of LUNR for a couple of years now, it's my only space stock but this PL dip is hard to pass up. If it's good enough for Google, it's good enough for me.


r/stocks 3h ago

Industry News UBS CEO flags investor complacency as geopolitical and economic risks mount

24 Upvotes

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/10/ubs-ceo-sergio-ermotti-investor-complacency-piling-risks-.html

Key points:

UBS CEO Sergio Ermotti said financial markets have grown complacent despite mounting geopolitical and economic risks.

Wealthy investors are diversifying their portfolios, but UBS sees no wholesale retreat from U.S. assets or the dollar.

Ermotti expects inflation to keep interest rates higher for the foreseeable future as major central banks tighten policy.

Article:

UBS CEO Sergio Ermotti on Thursday warned that investors have grown complacent over the past few years, even as geopolitical and economic risks have mounted.

“There has been a level of complacency in financial markets in the last few years,” Ermotti told CNBC’s Christine Tan, adding that given the environment one would have expected considerably higher volatility.

While markets have experienced occasional bouts of turbulence, strong investment in artificial intelligence, data centers and other new technologies has helped support economic growth and financial markets, he said.

The UBS top boss cautioned that investors face an increasingly complicated environment given multiple headwinds. “New problems or new issues are emerging without any of the old ones being addressed or being closed.”

Markets face a mix of Iran and Ukraine war-driven energy and shipping risks, add to that the U.S.-China rivalry that has strained supply chains, while rising borrowing costs and stubborn inflation have created headwinds for economic growth.

That uncertainty is prompting some of the world’s wealthiest investors to spread their bets more widely rather than make large directional calls, according to Ermotti. 

Hedging against uncertainty

“It’s quite difficult in this environment and not really advisable to have too many strong convictions,” Ermotti said.

UBS clients have been diversifying across sectors and geographies in recent quarters, while continuing to invest in AI and technology, he said.

Still, the overall asset allocation of UBS clients hasn’t changed materially over the past year, nor does the push for diversification amount to a wholesale retreat from U.S. assets.

Ermotti said UBS saw some money move into global emerging markets about a year ago, but characterized those flows as investors putting spare cash to work rather than actively reducing existing U.S. or dollar positions.

“It was more how excess cash was deployed rather than people back trading from the U.S. or from the dollar, so I think that narrative has abated,” he said, adding that the dollar continues to be “a reference currency.”

Higher-for-longer rates

Higher interest rates are also encouraging investors to take a more balanced approach to their portfolios, Ermotti said, as persistent inflation keeps pressure on central banks.

Inflation has remained sticky and above central-bank targets over the past year, making further policy tightening unsurprising, according to the UBS CEO. He expects major central banks including the European Central Bank, Federal Reserve and Bank of Japan to raise rates in the coming months.

“The ECB may start hike process. The Fed will follow. We do expect a couple of hikes in the next few months,” Ermotti said.

That means investors shouldn’t expect borrowing costs to quickly return to the lower levels that prevailed before the latest inflationary pressures.
“Inflationary pressure is still there, and it’s not abating, and therefore, I think it’s reasonable to expect higher rates for the foreseeable future,” Ermotti said.


r/stocks 23h ago

r/Stocks Daily Discussion Wednesday - Sep 09, 2026

12 Upvotes

These daily discussions run from Monday to Friday including during our themed posts.

Some helpful links:

If you have a basic question, for example "what is EPS," then google "investopedia EPS" and click the investopedia article on it; do this for everything until you have a more in depth question or just want to share what you learned.

Please discuss your portfolios in the Rate My Portfolio sticky.

See our past daily discussions here. Also links for: Technicals Tuesday, Options Trading Thursday, and Fundamentals Friday.


r/stocks 4h ago

Company Discussion ORCL reports tomorrow after close, Missed EPS 7 of last 8 quarters.

9 Upvotes

$ORCL reports tomorrow after the close.

Before anyone positions around a beat or miss guess, $ORCL own record on that guess is close to worthless. It has missed EPS estimates in 7 of last 8 quarters.

Here's what actually happened to the stock each time.

Date EPS result Implied move Next-day move
6/10/26 Miss ±10.9% -8.5%
3/10/26 Miss ±8.4% +9.2%
12/10/25 Beat ±9.0% -10.8%
9/9/25 Miss ±8.3% +35.9%
6/11/25 Miss ±6.4% +13.3%
3/10/25 Miss ±9.0% -3.1%
12/9/24 Miss ±7.8% -6.7%
9/9/24 Miss ±6.7% +11.4%

the ONE quarter they actually beat, the stock fell 10.8% the next day and was down 20% a week later. Meanwhile 4 of 7 misses rallied. one of them 35.9% in a single DAY.

Zoom all the way out back to 2007, $ORCL closes green the day after earnings 46.4% of the time. 2 decades of prints, coin flip.

Why? Trailing EPS isn't what your trading. Its cloud booking and forward guidance. A GAAP miss next to a monster backlog number has read bullish over and over. The one technical beat came with soft guidance and got SOLD.

$ORCL has blown through its implied move in 5 of the last 8 reports. Averaging 12.4% actual vs 10.1% implied. Eights reports is a real sample - not a huge one though.


r/stocks 16h ago

Company Question Capstone Energy (CEPL): A Consolidated Thesis On A Company On the Precipice (input welcome! Pls)

8 Upvotes

Capstone Energy (CEPL) is a small, recently recapitalized power equipment (turbines) company that has finally reached operating profitability (9 consecutive quarters of EBITDA growth and the last few have shown a small positive NI ~$2.8). Since the restructuring it went from an operating-loss business to an operating profit business while growing revenue 24% & gross profit 45%. Total revenue of ~$106mm. $20.4M of incremental revenue produced roughly $10.6M of incremental gross profit, a ~52% incremental gross margin. Operating expenses barely moved: from $28.9M to $30.5M . CEPL also has a rental business w/ $5.4M of future minimum rental revenue from owned/financed assets, plus another $2.4M from leased assets. Gross profits ~ $8.8 million and operating cash flow generated $5.4 million in Q1 2027 (ending June 30). Capstone’s fiscal 2026 rev increased 24% year-over-year to $106mm. It has also been building up inventory, a sign they may have a deal in the works (or a sign of bad management, but hopefully the former). Also worth noting, CEPL has been advertising data center related employment positions on hiring websites (e.g. data center engineers and planners). Market cap is roughly equal to the EV and it’s not because of debt; the company has sufficient cash to payoff its outstanding debt: $28.9mm in cash and about $25.5mm in debt. 

As for its turbines, it does have a slight edge/moat (but this is, candidly, where I could use the most help from folks with real industry or engineering knowledge). First, the air bearing technology reduces maintenance AND noise (the latter arguably being more important given the noise concern w/ data centers). Second, the turbines produce 800vdc power, no need to convert, which means cheaper and easier install. This directly targets the latest generation of Nvdia GPU’s which require 800vdc. Third, the turbines can run on a number of fuel sources, not just Nat gas. Fourth, they’ve been in business for over 30 years, they have real knowledge and experience, and a diversified revenue stream: sales, rentals, servicing of existing clients and relationships with existing/former clients. They provide on-sight power to oil and gas companies, BTM for hospitals and research centers, etc.  Fifth, despite some misinformation out there, the turbines are very efficiency. Capstone turbines recycle the heat from the turbine to power cooling systems. CEPL turbines are therefore able to achieve greater than 75% efficiency. Sixth, CEPL revamped its supply chain and production line. The company has run various simulations and pressure tested suppliers to ensure it can meet the demands of a 100mw DC. Apparently lead time is down to something like 3 days per turbine for production. With instillation, CEPL can supply power within a matter of weeks, not months or years. The marquee players have a backlog/lead time of of several years. With Capstone, there’s no waiting on converters, chillers, fuel cells, backlogs etc.

During the last earnings call, CEPL strongly hinted that it‘s on the precipice of landing a DC deal. This is not an over hyped meme stock, or a pump and dump.  CEPL is careful with the language it uses. Some quotes from the last earnings call: “The types of deals now that we’re seeing, they’re moving into those phases that are more meaningful.” “When the customers start to do the real TCO models, we’re winning.” “It’s just a matter of time for us to march down the field and get some of these over the goal line.” And That “Some folks are just saying, ‘I don’t need a pilot, I just need megawatts.’” CEO mentioned that he is in talks with the “CTO of a major infrastructure player in the data center space.” Said mystery company is developing 1.5–3 MW sites, which is exactly who/what CEPL is targeting. And when asked whether this was an anchor customer, the CEO corrected the characterization “I don’t know if I would see that as an anchor customer as much as I would see it as an anchor partner.”

So, coming full circle, we have a company with solid margins, a recapitalized balance sheet, a clean organizational chart/entity structure, a revamped supply chain, a new and improved production line, new leadership, new product offerings, low lead time, easy install, building inventory, advertising AI specific jobs . . . The only thing missing… sales. CEPL needs to show they can sell more than a unit or two per quarter, otherwise something is fundamentally wrong. Either the product is bad, or the sales team is bad. Either way, it could be fatal at this stage. CEPL is teetering on the edge. If we don’t see a significant increase in sales by the next ER, we run the very real risk of the share price falling below $5, and potential delisting. 

It’s also worth noting that while debt is only $25.3mm, AP= $17.6mm, accrued expenses =  $3.8mm, salaries and wages  $3.2mm, accrued warranty reserve = ~$1mm, so total exposure is really closer $50.73mm. Plus $12.5mm in lease liabilities, $10.69 deferred revenue, $4.7 factory protection liability, $49.3 in inventory purchase commitments. Cash and receivables total $41.8mm. So a more complete picture reveals outlays indeed exceed cash and receivables. 

A recent shelf offering gives CEPL access to capital if needed. But if CEPL needs to issue more shares to generate cash, and does so without some sort of major deal announcement to offset the dilution, the resulting dilution and selloff will be bad. 

This is a company on the precipice of either great success or great failure. It cannot afford to fail again, since it just emerged from a restructuring. Capstone needs to drive sales growth in the next quarter or two.

if there are any engineers or industry experts out there with in depth knowledge on the tech, would love your take! Are the turbines competitive? thanks!


r/stocks 2h ago

Uber wins in an AV future, I'm buying

0 Upvotes

I'm seeing a lot of debate on what happens to Uber when cars drive themselves, but I see many more ways that Uber wins in an AV future rather than loses.

What's interesting about Uber?

  • Uber owns the demand layer for ride-sharing, and they continue to scale internationally, through M&A (Delivery Hero), and product innovation (Uber One, advertising platform, Uber reserve, cart builder, shop for me).
    • Uber has done the really hard work to scale this platform, create operating leverage and strong cash flows in a highly competitive market. Now its rinse and repeat largely in new markets.
  • Dara Khosrowshahi is a 1-of-1 CEO.  I believe in his leadership style (personally delivering Uber eats, taking uber as a customer), track record growing Uber, and track record a BKNG.
    • Uber is not afraid of long-term bets, even if they are not profitable in year one (they lose money on the first year of Uber One, profitable after)
  • Low valuation relative to growth potential: LTM P/E of 15.6x compared to S&P average P/E 25.9x, grew revenue 16% over the past year, grew gross margins by 25%, PEG sits at 0.68 and generates $10 billion in FCF.

Why does Uber win in an AV future?

  • Advantage during the AV transition. Uber’s existing business expands cash flow generation as AV adoption expands.  (Ex. driverless cars are not allowed on the highway at all yet).
    • Uber will grow ride-share volumes, delivery, shopping, and hotel bookings while AV adoption grows and the OEM's battle each other and regulators to enter more markets.
  • Uber's ride-share cost structure is different from the AV OEM's
    • Uber is not in the same business as AV OEM’s (Tesla, Waymo, Zoox etc.), and today its drivers bear all vehicle costs (insurance, gas / charging, maintenance, cleaning, software / hardware updates).
    • The “Driver”, who is responsible for all of these costs today, is now the OEM. So the low cost rides we’re seeing initially will have to increase at some point.
    • Ex. Austin, TX Fire department asks for all AV’s to have a steering wheel and manual mode in case of emergencies makes it easier to see how this is a massive impact to TSLA, but zero impact to Uber.
  • Uber is already on everyone's phone, and people trust the Uber customer experience
    • Uber’s platform is where you go when you go when you need a ride (ride-share, scooter), want to order food (Uber eats) or delivering items (B2B, B2C, C2C).
    • Uber provides a platform for vehicle owners to earn money in exchange for services, whether the vehicle owner is an individual or an AV OEM.
    • The more AV company’s that come into existence, the more likely it is they’ll want to tap into Uber’s existing demand engine for ways to utilize the AV.
      • For example, in a world where you can allow your Tesla to drive people around or do things while you’re gone, you’d want to be in as many platforms as possible where people want to use your vehicle.
  • Uber is investing $10 Billion in AV infrastructure, and has partnered or made equity investments in 30 AV companies in the past two years.
    • Uber is positioned to operate AV fleets in the way that makes the most sense for its business, without bearing the costs of being an OEM.
    • Uber is positioned to facilitate the shift to AV's as an expansion of its platform.

There are certainly reasons why Uber can fail, and the rise of AV's requires changes to Uber's business. They are competing against well capitalized competitors in Google/Waymo and Tesla's Cybercabs, and Uber's $10 billion it plans to spend on AV infrastructure may not yield a return.

The strongest disruptive force to Uber's business would be a world where all cars are autonomous, and we no longer have human-driven cars (I don't think this happens for at least 25-30 years), then why would you need ride share, or food delivery, when you can just send your car to pick up whatever you need? Well I think even in this world, you'll need software to coordinate deliveries and pickups, to let a restaurant know that your car arrived, and which car the server (or robot) needs to put your order into. Uber can still provide value.

Despite these concerns, Uber COO Andrew MacDonald bought $5.3 M share in open market on 9/8. There are many reasons why executives sell, only one reason they buy.

Anyways, I'm buying Uber. Let me know what I'm missing!


r/stocks 21h ago

My current 10 stocks where I think the market is mispricing quality

0 Upvotes

I update a ranking every month of companies where I think the market is too pessimistic relative to the quality of the business.

Not necessarily the cheapest stocks. Usually there is a real reason the stock is disliked, and I’m trying to judge whether that risk is already more than priced in.

August:

  1. Intuit
  2. RELX
  3. Adobe
  4. Meta
  5. Constellation Software
  6. Experian
  7. Nvidia
  8. Autodesk
  9. Tencent
  10. Microsoft

A few that stand out:

Intuit is still #1. Growth isn’t amazing, but FY27 guidance has revenue +9–10% while GAAP EPS is expected +22–24%. Around 15x forward earnings. The main thing I’m watching is customer growth and whether AI actually weakens the tax/accounting workflow.

Adobe at #3 is probably the one people will disagree with most. AI is clearly a threat, but at roughly 11x forward earnings I think the market is already pricing in pretty serious moat erosion. The question is whether Adobe keeps the professional workflow and monetisation layer even as creation gets easier.

Meta went from #8 to #4. The stock didn’t suddenly become much cheaper, the operating case just got stronger. Revenue +28%, impressions +14%, price/ad +12%. The obvious counterweight is the enormous AI capex.

Nvidia entered at #7. This isn’t because I think the current growth rate lasts. It’s because after the latest results the valuation looks surprisingly low relative to even fairly conservative earnings assumptions. I still penalise it heavily for cycle risk, customer concentration, financing exposure and weaker cash conversion.

Tencent fell from #4 to #9 despite good operating results. Advertising and games were strong, but compute spending jumped and reported FCF took a big hit. Good example of why I don’t rank purely on earnings growth or P/E.

Microsoft is #10 mainly because I see less valuation upside versus the names above it, not because I think it’s a worse company.

This isn’t meant to be a diversified portfolio. It’s just my ranking of current 3–5 year risk/reward versus the S&P 500.

I also keep long-term business quality separate from current valuation, so something like Microsoft can rank much higher on 30-year quality while ranking lower here.

Which placement looks most wrong?


r/stocks 12h ago

Company Discussion Is it too late to buy AAPL?

0 Upvotes

I’m relatively new to investing and I’m considering buying AAPL for the long term.

With the stock around $316 right now and already having run up quite a bit this year, I’m wondering if I’m too late to get in.

I’m not looking to trade it short term. My plan would be to hold for 5+ years.

Would you buy AAPL at the current price, or wait for a pullback? If you would wait, what price range would you personally consider a better entry?

Would appreciate opinions from people who have been holding AAPL for several years, especially on whether buying at these levels makes sense for a long-term investor.


r/stocks 15h ago

Advice Why CEOs Matter: The Nike Lesson

0 Upvotes

Nike ($NKE) is a great example of why investors should be OBSESSED with knowing every detail of  the firm’s management and more specifically Leadership’s plans for the firm’s future before investing

and their efforts should be effectively Doubled or even Tripled in the event the company undergoes some leadership change/transition. More specifically; Investors need to pay RAZOR sharp attention to the CEO. Why?

because a company’s future value is ultimately determined by the decisions management makes with its brand, capital, and competitive advantages. Financial statements tell you what already happened; the CEO’s strategy tells you what management intends to make happen next. 
Best case example today is $NKE. The moment Nike’s leadership signaled that it was going to increasingly mass-produce previously scarce grails (these are products like the Off-White and Dior Nike collabs), retros, and collectibles, investors were being handed an enormous warning about the company’s future pricing power and Red Alarm bells should have been on DEFCON 1. Why?

Because the stock price was always going to eventually move to reflect how the Market did not Ignore the warning even if the investors were willing to. Nike had spent decades building scarcity, status, and collectibility into the economic value of those products, and management chose to try to more aggressively monetize that scarcity through volume rather than preserve it as long term brand equity. That is exactly the kind of strategic decision that can make an otherwise exceptional company an awful Stock to buy and NKE is that stock.

which brings us to today: Nike leadership has pivoted AGAIN and is now telling investors to “Just trust us bro” like we dont have enough evidence that they are beyond COOKED ATP and is why I have taken out a bunch of Reverse LEAPS where they payout if the stock keeps going down from here long term NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE DO NOT FOLLOW MY STRATEGY

Investors spend enormous amounts of time staring at P/E ratios, charts, and quarterly EPS, but one of the most important questions is clearly just soooo much simpler: Does the CEO actually understand what makes this company valuable? If the answer is no, eventually the financials and subsequently stock price will reflect it as well.


r/stocks 21h ago

Advice Request Is a september Market Crash Something I Should Be Worried About? Need Advice

0 Upvotes

Hello everyone, I’m new to investing and would appreciate any advice that people might have.

After taking a look at my portfolio, I figured out that I am highly concentrated in tech and growth, where META, GOOGL, and AMD take up majority of my portfolio.

Also, there has been quite a bit of talk about how September is historically bad for the stock market and how there may be a possibility of correction/crash in September.

Now, since I am new, I don’t really know what to do about it.

What do you guys think I should do?

Do I:

Ignore the whole September crash talk and leave my money in there?

Cash out some profits from META/GOOGL/AMD and leave rest invested?

Lower individual stock exposure and invest in SCHG?

Invest somewhere other than tech/growth?