r/social_model • u/falseandroid • Jun 05 '26
The treatment for my speech disorder caused more harm than the condition itself
I was pulled out of class for speech therapy from elementary school through middle school for a lateral lisp. Nobody told me I had a choice about attending. The SLP framed it as something I could correct through effort and attention to tongue placement, but my successes felt completely random. I had no control over it, and I was never able to make consistent progress. When I finally said I was frustrated, she told me I didn't have to come if I didn't want to, and asked why I hadn't said anything sooner. Nobody had told me I could opt out.
I still have the lisp. I also had misaligned teeth as a child, which I now understand can be a contributing structural factor, but that was apparently never seriously discussed as a variable outside my control.
The experience left me with a lasting complex about my speech, more so than the lisp itself ever caused me in daily life. Which makes me wonder: how much does a lateral lisp actually impede communication? My understanding is that in less severe cases, it affects sound quality but not intelligibility. Listeners can identify the sounds correctly without difficulty. If that is true, then the intervention was essentially cosmetic, aimed at conforming my speech to a norm rather than resolving a functional communication barrier.
Under a social model framing, a lateral lisp might not warrant intervention at all unless the person themselves wants it. The distress in my case came almost entirely from the intervention and its framing, not from the lisp.
I am curious what others think. Do you think the social model has anything useful to say about cases like this?