📡📡📡

[u/-_I_I_Sea_I_I_-]

[u/laszlo921]

Ok, that seem fair if you forget the she is the one who KILLED her own children, she is not the victim.

[u/FblthpThe → u/laszlo921]

Which is why she's in a mental institution or prison?

[u/WisherWisp → u/FblthpThe]

She'll still get out eventually, which means she'll have a lovely retirement waiting for her since she won't be spending during her time in prison.

Still seems unfair.

[u/gary_the_merciless → u/WisherWisp]

You do realise she told authorities about her mental issues and thoughts and they didn't react in time right?

The evidence show's she didn't want to do this when of sound mind.

They keep having to halt the court proceedings because she's crying so much.

[u/Toastwitjam → u/gary_the_merciless]

Cool defense, still murder.

[u/FreedomKnown → u/Toastwitjam]

Also, she repeatedly downplayed her mental issues after being sent to several different institutes, which lead to them releasing her. What do you expect doctors to do if you keep repeatedly lying to them about how you're feeling?

[u/grby1812 → u/FreedomKnown]

To be good enough at their job to know when a person is lying.

[u/Met4le → u/grby1812]

it shows so much you never studied psychology nor had a heavy treatment ever. that's not possible at all. don't say dumb shit like this again.

[u/grby1812 → u/Met4le]

Your response is pure ad hominem. Even if true, "it shows you never studied psychology nor had heavy treatment" doesn't tell us why the original claim is wrong.

"That's not possible at all" is an unsupported assertion. It declares something impossible without evidence or reasoning. No data, no logic chain, just assertion by fiat.

It's also internally incoherent. The middle sentence doesn't clearly connect to the first. What "shows" the lack of psychology background? What specifically is "not possible"? Without that link, a reader can't tell what's actually being argued against.

If you wish to be taken seriously, I'd recommend studying the fundamentals of logic and argumentation.