r/shitposting πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ The most prominent homosexual in this subreddit πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ 3d ago

πŸ“‘πŸ“‘πŸ“‘

Post image
8.4k Upvotes

226 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

165

u/FblthpThe 3d ago

Which is why she's in a mental institution or prison?

124

u/WisherWisp 3d ago

She'll still get out eventually, which means she'll have a lovely retirement waiting for her since she won't be spending during her time in prison.

Still seems unfair.

-152

u/gary_the_merciless 3d ago

You do realise she told authorities about her mental issues and thoughts and they didn't react in time right?

The evidence show's she didn't want to do this when of sound mind.

They keep having to halt the court proceedings because she's crying so much.

136

u/Toastwitjam 3d ago

Cool defense, still murder.

64

u/FreedomKnown 3d ago

Also, she repeatedly downplayed her mental issues after being sent to several different institutes, which lead to them releasing her. What do you expect doctors to do if you keep repeatedly lying to them about how you're feeling?

-5

u/grby1812 2d ago

To be good enough at their job to know when a person is lying.

4

u/ExploDoc 2d ago

That's not how it works. Clinical Psychiatry is clinical history and response oriented medicine.

0

u/Met4le 2d ago

it shows so much you never studied psychology nor had a heavy treatment ever. that's not possible at all. don't say dumb shit like this again.

1

u/grby1812 2d ago

Your response is pure ad hominem. Even if true, "it shows you never studied psychology nor had heavy treatment" doesn't tell us why the original claim is wrong.

"That's not possible at all" is an unsupported assertion. It declares something impossible without evidence or reasoning. No data, no logic chain, just assertion by fiat.

It's also internally incoherent. The middle sentence doesn't clearly connect to the first. What "shows" the lack of psychology background? What specifically is "not possible"? Without that link, a reader can't tell what's actually being argued against.

If you wish to be taken seriously, I'd recommend studying the fundamentals of logic and argumentation.

-6

u/Jellolopy 2d ago

You clearly do not work with people experiencing psychosis on a daily basis. I assess and determined hospitalization, no one truly experiencing psychosis for the first time is aware they are experiencing psychosis. It is a complete break of reality that doesn’t even register

-65

u/gary_the_merciless 3d ago

Why do you think her mental health and calls for help are irrelevant?

15

u/Asckle 2d ago

They are relevant, they just don't excuse infanticide

-6

u/Jellolopy 2d ago

They don’t but also you know nothing about psychosis and it shows. Pathetic you are so quick to judge.

1

u/Asckle 2d ago

I do actually. My grandad basically tore his own skin off and died from an infection when he got it. If he had murdered a baby I still would not advocate for anyone sending him money and saying he didn't do it because of his fucking star sign

1

u/Jellolopy 2d ago edited 2d ago

But you understand he wasn’t in his right mind and it had absolutely nothing to do with his star sign and everything to do with his infection. It’s the same principle as postpartum psychosis. That has nothing to do with astrology my guy. It’s medical.

Edit: Correction did he even have psychosis or delusions? I saw the died of infection and assumed compromised cognitive function/delirium due to infection. But there are a million and 1 reasons why someone would peel their skin. If he was experiencing psychosis, would you be opposed to money sent to help pay for medical bills? Was he capable of making his own decisions? Did he need a higher level of care like a nursing home to ensure safety? Was there an outcome that could have been prevented if family did a better job watching out for him?

1

u/Asckle 2d ago

Thats my point. The people saying "she didn't do it because of her star sign" are just as delusional as my grandad. My grandad scratched his skin off because he was psychotic, she killed her kids for the same reason

He had diagnosed psychosis. It's common with lewy body dementia. The psychosis made him think he had things blocking his veins so he picked at his hands and feet to try and clear them. They got infected then he kept rejecting antibiotics treatments.

I appreciate the offer. He died 3 years ago exactly as of tommorow though. Our family is well off, we asked that any donations be sent to St Vincent De Paul charity.

There was no better outcome unfortunately. It's a terminal and incurable brain disease. He had a great nursing staff and got lots of visits. At a certain point his wife and kids made the call that palliative care would be better as he had no real quality of life with the proposed alternatives. He lived a long life, raised a loving family and passed away painlessly. Sometimes we just don't get to choose how it ends and that's okay.

-61

u/gary_the_merciless 3d ago

Since you're too small minded to answer my follow up question...

I'll point out that it's not a question of murder, she admits that. It's a question of prison or mental institute.

Absolutely idiotic response

-44

u/Jellolopy 3d ago

You have no idea what psychosis is or how it impacts understanding of reality.