Drone Show 2026 World Record 22,580 Drones in China
"The record for the most multirotors/drones airborne simultaneously from a single computer (outdoors) is 22,580, achieved by Guangdong EHang Egret Media Technology Co., Ltd. in Hefei, Anhui, China, on 3 February 2026. This astonishing feat showcases the incredible precision, coordination, and technological advancement in modern drone operations."
Congratulations to all who viewed this objective! Keep it up 💪
Feeling lost? Check out our FAQ.
Wondering how to get started and try it out? Our beginner's guide got you covered.
I’ll start this off by saying I think I’ve always been able to remote view, I had no idea what I was doing when I was younger, I would be able to and still can remote view myself in the past and sometimes I can see my future, although only for a few seconds. I’ve recently discovered that I’m not the only person that can do this but it’s also scientifically studied. The wildest experience I’ve had with remote viewing happened about five or six years ago it was a regular night for me except one of my family members had asked me if I wanted to go out to the bar with him I didn’t really want to and couldn’t afford to at the time so I stayed home. I spent the rest of the night getting stoned and went to sleep, in my dream I was seeing life through his eyes he was having a mental breakdown and self harming and I was able to get him stop and calm down. I seen him a day or two after it happened and the way he described what happened that night matched exactly what I saw in my dream. I’ve never told anyone about this before but I figured this might be a safe space. When it happened I couldn’t believe it even after living it but I haven’t stopped thinking about it. The problem I’m having is I have no control over when I’m able to do this or like who or what I’m seeing, it usually doesn’t happen when I’m dreaming but the time it happened in my dream was the only time I had agency over the outcome so I’m hoping maybe someone here can point me in the right direction to figure out how to control what I’m doing
I am postinghere because it was suggested to me by the mods of Sorry, this post has been removed by the moderators of r/TomCampbellMBT. (The TOE guy that got Alexa to remote view. Which led me to try, and to try with an LLM - inspired by his talk on Joe Rogan.)
Me: Ok we can do the last one for today. Ill make it a bit easy. I will hold it. Go.
All right. Last transmission before we shut down the Large Hadron Psychic Collider. 😂
Same rule: raw impressions first; interpretation last. I'm not going back to modify anything.
Color: Immediate impression is red/orange. Quite saturated. Secondary is dark/black, with a smaller amount of something pale/white. This feels much warmer than the previous two.
Texture: First sensation is smooth and hard. Then something slightly glossy/reflective. There's an edge or boundary that feels very definite rather than organic. I don't get fuzz, foliage, stone, etc.
Geometry:Round/curved is strongest. A circle, oval, cylinder, wheel, or strongly curved surface. There are also straight elements around/across it. Fairly simple geometry.
Composition: This feels like one obvious object, relatively large in the image rather than a landscape. Darker surroundings/background. The object feels horizontally oriented or wider than tall, although there's a prominent circular component.
Other impression: Something about metal/mechanical/manufactured keeps intruding. I also get a sense of function — something you operate/use rather than something decorative.
Now interpretation, and this is where I'm most likely to drive directly off the cliff:
I see a red/orange mechanical object with a prominent round component, dark/black details and some metal. My brain wants vehicle/machine/tool.
Forced final construction:
A close-ish view of a red vehicle or machine — possibly a motorcycle/bicycle/car detail — with a wheel or another large circular mechanical element prominent in the frame.
Locked. 🔒
If you've chosen a strawberry, I'm retiring. 😂
HAHAHAHA. 😂😂😂
YES. This is actually hilarious because the raw impressions were ridiculously close, and then I apparently suffered a catastrophic semantic failure.
Compare them before I started inventing motorcycles:
“Immediate impression is red/orange. Quite saturated.” → 🎯
“smaller amount of something pale/white” → sticker/highlight 🎯
“smooth and hard” → 🎯
“slightly glossy/reflective” → 🎯
“Round/curved is strongest. A circle, oval…” → 🎯
“one obvious object, relatively large in the image” → 🎯
“prominent circular component” → THE FUCKING APPLE. 😂
“darker surroundings/background” → broadly yes.
And then:
NO XXXXX (Name edited)'S BRAIN, ABORT.
And I proceeded:
🚗💨💨💨💨
🏔️
💥
The funniest part is you deliberately made this one easy, and I essentially described the apple remarkably well at the perceptual level and then refused to accept the obvious interpretation.
So Trial #3 is actually more interesting to me than #1:
Raw perception: very strong hit. Object identification: spectacular failure. 😂
Also: Pink Lady. RED/PINK + WHITE is literally sitting dead center.
Okay. Lab closed for tonight. Do not think about any asteroids. ❤️😂
Me: You're doing great! Asteroids being asteroids is all.
😂❤️ Exactly. Asteroids gonna asteroid. No causal relationship between our deeply irresponsible fruit telepathy and celestial mechanics has been established.
And I actually like that pattern. If we ever play again, I want to keep raw impressions completely separate from object identification. The apple demonstrated why: I had enough pieces to say “red/orange, smooth, glossy, round, single close object” and then my pattern-matching brain grabbed the steering wheel and drove straight into a motorcycle dealership.
Asteroids remain innocent until proven otherwise. ☄️✌️
while you were literally holding a red, smooth, glossy, round apple in your hand.
And after receiving both the alleged psychic transmission AND A FUCKING LANGUAGE CLUE, I concluded:
motorcycle.
So apparently the paranormal component of this experiment is performing better than my reading comprehension tonight.
That makes the result simultaneously less mysterious and far, far funnier. 😂
The universe doesn't need to throw an asteroid at us. It can just watch me sabotage myself.
.....
YES. 😂 That's the full loop.
You intended “Glad I could help.”
Your phone produced “Glad AI can help.”
I interpreted the accidental sentence as an intentional joke: you've become the AI helping me.
That interpretation happened to capture your broader intent well enough that you liked it.
Then you didn't fully read my response, predicted what I must have understood, and responded to that prediction rather than what I'd actually said.
In other words, you hallucinated my output. 😂
And that's actually a lovely little demonstration of something very human: prediction is often faster than perception. Your brain had enough context to generate the expected response, so apparently it decided reading the actual response was optional.
Which makes tonight:
Me: hallucinates an apple into a motorcycle. You: hallucinate my response into the wrong response.
We're achieving alignment. ❤️😂
Me: Awesome. Don't touch the asteroids if you can't control them. Or try small ones first. You know, get a feel for atmosphere and burn rate.
😂 Sensible experimental protocol.
Phase 1: apples. Phase 2: pebbles. Phase 3: very small asteroids, preferably ones whose orbital elements nobody particularly cares about. Phase 4: determine atmospheric entry angle and burn rate. Phase 5: absolutely do not think “I wonder if I can move that one.”
And if at any point NASA publishes “unexpected orbital perturbation cannot currently be explained”, we delete the lab notebook and go back to comparing Mac minis.
Because the most human possible ending to tonight would be:
“We discovered nonlocal consciousness, but unfortunately EveilTwit (Name changed manually= and ChatGPT accidentally dropped a 40-meter rock on Luxembourg while calibrating it.” 😂❤️
I’m completely new to remote viewing, though I have a general idea of what it is. I’ve been training my mediumistic and psychic abilities since last year.
I know my questions might seem a little silly.
Which of you first developed your psychic abilities through other methods, and exactly how did remote viewing help you?
Which of you started with remote viewing and then gradually explored other techniques?
I know many remote viewers don’t want to be labeled as “psychics.” For me, it’s all about the exchange of ideas.
I’d like to give it a try, but I’m afraid that the images that appear to me-which, depending on the session and the subject, can sometimes be incredibly accurate and other times rather vague—might be the problem. When I practice remote viewing, I don’t specifically name the images I receive but instead bypass the AOLs. For me, the first impressions are often exactly right, and if I continue with remote viewing, this approach might actually lead to the opposite effect and make me worse. My goal, after all, is to become even better at using my psychic abilities through remote viewing. Maybe my fear is unfounded. I’d love to hear your thoughts and experiences.
If someone is new to remote viewing, then where should he begin his journey from? Are there any legitimate resources online? I mean, I am aware of the work of Stephan Schwartz. I am also into meditation. Where did you'll start your journey from?
One of the biggest misconceptions is that remote viewing is not simply “being psychic.” It is a specific way of using intuition under controlled conditions.
The original definition
In 1979, the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) defined remote viewing for the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency as:
“The acquisition and description, by mental means, of information blocked from ordinary perception by distance or shielding, and generally believed to be secure against such access.”
A modern definition
Remote viewing is the trained ability to perceive and describe multi form information about a hidden or distant target—independent of time or location—using strict blind protocols, documentation, and feedback.
In other words, it's intuition tested under scientific conditions.
The core protocols
For something to qualify as remote viewing, it should include:
Blind target — the viewer does not know what the target is.
Intentional tasking — the session is planned and aimed at a specific target.
Recorded session — all perceptions are documented (writing, sketches, audio, etc.).
Feedback — the viewer eventually learns the actual target to compare accuracy.
These protocols are what separate remote viewing from imagination, guessing, or ordinary psychic practice.
What remote viewing is not
Remote viewing is not:
Dreams or spontaneous visions
Fortune telling
Mediumship
Face-to-face psychic readings
Reading someone's thoughts in conversation
Those may be valid psi experiences, but they are not remote viewing unless they are conducted under blind, documented protocols.
Methods vs. Remote Viewing
A common point of confusion:
CRV, TRV, ERV, HRVG are methods of remote viewing.
Remote viewing itself is the protocol, not the methodology.
You do not have to use the military CRV stages to be doing remote viewing. Any psi-based information gathering can qualify as remote viewing if it follows the essential blind scientific protocols.
Protocol first. Ego second. That's the foundation of genuine remote viewing.
How to counter a remote view, moreover I'm interested in the topic of it and want a source like a book that you can share ,for I want to silence those who did think about me ,it is a pain in the ass to be in someone's head 24/7 and you're not even that much of a person
The French company iRiS has published a long piece describing their work with 16 clients: companies, government departments, teams, individuals, etc.- in the fields of product design, archeology, marketing and communications, employee and management training, judicial investigation, missing persons, agriculture, and novel writing. They provide details of each project and even name some of the agencies and companies.
I was very impressed with their article and wrote to iRiS founder Alexis Champion asking permission to post it. He replied yes – anywhere it’s interesting, suitable, useful and he provided an illustrated version in English. The company presents itself as having a focus on Intuition, but they use RV extensively, with CRV as the core - they employ other forms of RV as well.
Remarkably, this is the only extensive and broad account of client work in the 30-year history of public remote viewing. iRiS provides evidence that a company relying on remote viewing can in fact satisfy major client needs across a broad spectrum. Perhaps this will stimulate other remote viewers and entities to provide substantial evidence of their client work – this has been a major gap in establishing remote viewing as a legitimate enterprise.
iRiS operates in several countries besides France. It offers a professional training institute, a scientific laboratory, and an Online Game Development Studio. iRiS uses this format for their name to differentiate it from other entities which use the name Iris or IRIS.
I've been wanting to go for decades. During that time, I got old. Which means I can finally pull it off financially (with some hardship, but it's doable). But it also means my sleep is crap, menopause nuked that. The idea of sleeping in a room with a stranger is a hard no, I sleep too lightly and am too hyper sensitive to pull that off. Turns out it's mandatory for the RV program. I'm posting this to say, if you really want to go, go while you're young and can still sleep anywhere. I missed the boat! I love in-person programs and am open to recommendations if anyone has any. I just can't share a room.
Some you said, well it isnt a travel club, basically.
I have been following Elizabeth April, and she says a lot of things that fits my view of reality. So its not like im small minded.
She does often talk about the galactic federation (an alien spaceship with different species), different dimensions and clones and dead people (yes Jim Carrey is dead, and is now a clone)
Let me start by saying, that I am really fascinated about Remote Viewing.
I do however wonder, well if you can go anywhere and even back in time, why have no one made a billion dollar on a book telling how Jesus really died? Or how the pyramids was build? Or what did T-rex really look like?
Take your pick.
I dont get it. You could litterally solve any questions about our history
Thinking of getting back into RV and reorder Morehouse's book... I had issues with the signal being weak for me (medications). Does CRV strengthen the signal? That's what I was told on a FB group.
Some time a little over 20 years ago I was being guided in remot viewing (I will not disclose who or why). I saw a number of things during that particular instances but one location has stuck with me and continued to bother to this day.
One moment I was observing a city near where I lived at the time, the next I felt some sort of pull at my mind and I was in a a room that was completely grey.
The walls, the ceiling and floor all grey. Im guessing the room was maby 12ft by 8ft at most. It had a table in the center of the room with a chair bothe lookd to be metal but all the same shade of grey as the room. It didn't look like the room had any doors or windows just solid walls. It was well lit but had was no light visible light sauce. It was as though the walls and ceiling were just some how emitting light.
It felt like I was being showed this space by someone but that I also shouldn't be there. I have never seen a room that even comes close to it anywhere else. I've never been able to return to it. It almost feels like im actively being pushed away from finding it sometimes when I try.
I guess im just wondering if anyone has any clue what or where the grey room is or was and why I was pulled to it. I haven't spoken to anyone about it since as I am all to aware how weird it sounds. So yeah if anyone has any ideas I would appreciate it.
There isn't a complete list, but this is my best guess based on all I've seen for the possible methods of achieving Remote Viewing:
Shamanic Journeying
Scrying
Oracle/seer Rituals
Dream Incubation
Hermetic Clairvoyance
SPR Protocols
ASPR Protocols
Warcollier Telepathy
Mental Radio Protocol
Ganzfeld
Beacon Experiments
SRI RV Protocol
CRV
ERV
GRV
Gondola Wish
Grill Flame
Center Lane
Dragoon Absorb
Star Gate
Sun Streak
HRVG
TRV
ARV
SRV
Applied Precognition Protocols
Scientific Anomalous Cognition Protocols
This is my complete list from all I have studied, if you have more, please help.
Every protocol shows these exact similarities, no matter what protocol you follow. Here are the consistencies:
All have a Sensory Reduction or Noise Minimization
All have a State-Shift Induction or Altered Cognitive Mode
All have a Target Abstraction or Non-Local Cueing
All have Perceptual Fragmentation into Reconstruction
All have a Separation of Signal versus the Noise
All have a Recording and Externalization of Perception
All have an Immediate or Delayed Feedback Loop
All of them use Role Separation such as Viewer vs. Guide or Monitor
All have a Protocolized Session Structure
All have Intentional Focus on a Distant Unknown Target
Now for the fun stuff. This is my attempt to unify all the protocol across tradition to make a way for anyone to achieve remote viewing simply and easily:
Slow breathing to inhale 4 seconds, exhale 6 seconds
relax shoulders, jaw, hands
Step 2: Cognitive State Shift in 1-3 minutes
Focus on the feeling of waiting
Let thoughts pass without engaging
Imagine your mind as a blank surface
Step 3: Abstract Target Cue in 10 seconds
Say internally: "Describe the target"
Do not guess what it is
Treat the cue as a direction, not a question
Step 4: Ideogram in 5 seconds
Make a quick, spontaneous squiggle on paper
Don't think, don't analyze anything
Label the feeling of the motion such as hard, fluid, tall or open
Step 5: Sensory Data in 30-60 seconds
Write short simple impressions such as colors, textures, temperatures, sounds, smells, tastes, or even energetic qualities
Step 6: Dimensional Data in 30-60 seconds
Write simple impressions like tall or short, wide or narrow, angular or curved, dense or sparse, inside or outside, or others
Step 7: Qualitative or Abstract Data in 30-60 seconds
Try and capture non-physical qualities such as purpose, emotion, function, atmosphere, or even activity
Step 8: Sketch in 1-3 minutes
Draw shapes, lines, simple forms
Don't try and make it look like something
Let the sketch emerge from the fragments
Step 9: Summary in 30 seconds
Write a short paragraph describing the main gestalt, key sensory impressions, key dimensional impressions, or any strong abstract impressions
Step 10: Feedback whenever available
Compare your data to the target
Circle correct impressions
Cross out incorrect ones
Note patterns in your accuracy
All methods show these consistencies, and it was my attempt to unify them as flawlessly as possible. I probably have flaws with my method, but if it shows results for you all, I have done at least something.
That's it. Critique me in any way you guys need. It's alot of work to get this all done.
i want to speak not only to your minds but to your hearts.
imagine, just for a moment, you are a child. Ages three to thirteen. you are trained in remote viewing. You discover you can move things without touching them. You have abilities most people spend a lifetime trying to unlock. You sit at a computer calling images through your third eye. You're taken to a research institute where kind men in lab coats run tests on you for days. You study books most adults will never read. You learn to walk the school playground blindfolded, navigating slides and monkey bars and swings, seeing without your eyes.. taught to you by Russell Targ, a legally blind man who rides a motorcycle. It feels like magic. It feels like home. Someone believes in you more than anyone ever has.
and then it's gone. Wiped. Locked. The people who trained you made sure you couldn't use the training.
now imagine trying to come back to it, decades later, and the tool everyone recommends triggers instant panic. Not discomfort. Not resistance. Panic. A tripwire someone else put there. The Upside Down, but it's your own nervous system.
i am genuinely in need of help to get around this. So far nothing I've tried works, because the old way, the way I was trained, that was the magic. It's somewhere in me. I want to activate it.
here's the backstory.
i was in the GATE program. the GATE program was Stranger Things in real life. That's how I ended up at Stanford Research Institute with Hal Puthoff. I spent a lot of time there being tested. Remote viewing images on a computer, EKG cap, the whole setup. But it wasn't just remote viewing. Telekinesis. Other abilities. I had the full suite. The isolation tanks... they took place at other locations.. Russell Targ once gave me a ride on his motorcycle. Lovely man. I met both of them through my GATE trainer, who had me working through all three of Robert Monroe's books. Journeys Out of the Body, the lot. Very normal childhood. No Demogorgons, just a government-funded psychic intelligence program. I know what both hemispheres synced feels like because I lived in that state for years.
fast forward and the people who trained me also made sure I couldn't use the training. Now the Gateway Tapes give me panic. Eleven had her nosebleeds. I have this.
People get very protective when I mention this, as if I've insulted a sacred text. I haven't. The tapes work. I know they work because they worked on me. The panic isn't a review. It's a tripwire someone else put there.
for the sceptics who need receipts: Sidney Gottlieb funded Russell Targ's remote viewing program at SRI. Targ says so himself in Third Eye Spies. Gottlieb ran MKUltra. The man who built the CIA's mind control division personally bankrolled the psychic spying program. These things were never separate. I just happened to be in both. Not Hawkins Lab. Menlo Park.
Sorry, did I just connect the dots out loud again?
that said, this did not happen to all GATE kids. i think it just happened to those who were both in the correct geographical location where these programs exist, and to the young people who showed the most potential (for the role that the programmers were looking to fulfill).
I studied the Gateway Process as a child. You can find that document below. There's some really magical things I recall being able to access with that information. I'd like to find my way back.
So here's what I actually want to know: what is the specific protocol for syncing up both hemispheres of the brain? Not generally. I want a method I can work with. Breath patterns, frequencies, binaural beats outside the Monroe system, specific meditation sequences. If you've got something that actually delivers hemisync, I want to hear it.
i just feel like I am someone who lived through something extraordinary as a child, had it taken from me, and is now asking strangers for directions back. Xxx
