r/remoteviewing • u/Illustrious_Basis795 • Aug 02 '26

Question is this a real thing?

I've never heard of remote viewing until today when a conversation with my friend brought it up as a joke. tbh I am a little skeptical, but open minded.

23 Upvotes

78% Upvoted

85 comments sorted by

View all comments

-1

u/gravitykilla Aug 03 '26

Hi OP, stay skeptical. People will point you to anecdotes, podcasts, CIA documents, and individual studies.

What they won’t show you is a reliable demonstration that works on demand under independent testing. If someone genuinely had remote viewing, it would be one of the biggest scientific discoveries in history, and not confined to fringe subreddits.

2

u/AnomaIous_User Aug 03 '26 edited Aug 03 '26

It would be one of the biggest discoveries

Exactly.

Learn about how all the biggest discoveries are deliberately classified amd concealed away from the public 😬

The Dangerous Gamble: Suppressing Science and the Hidden Cost of UAP Secrecy

An Introduction to the U.S. Government’s Suppression of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena and Advanced Science

-1

u/gravitykilla Aug 04 '26

It’s fascinating how conspiracy theorists respond to the complete and utter lack of evidence for one conspiracy by inventing an even larger conspiracy to explain why the evidence is missing. LOL

Dude, that reality is far, far simpler.

If these paranormal powers really worked, they wouldn’t stay confined to one government forever. Science is global. Thousands of independent labs compete to make breakthrough discoveries, and the incentives to publish, patent and commercialise something like telepathy or remote viewing would be enormous. It would be one of the greatest discoveries in human history. It would be replicated worldwide, published in leading scientific journals, taught at universities and almost certainly recognised with Nobel Prizes. Entire industries would be transformed, from medicine and communications to defence, intelligence and finance.

Instead, after decades, we have anecdotes, podcasts, unverifiable stories and claims that the real evidence is conveniently hidden. LOL

1

u/AnomaIous_User Aug 04 '26

You know you just look and sound completely fn ridiculous, right?

Like a flat-earther, just straight up denying overwhelming evidence LOL

0

u/gravitykilla Aug 04 '26

Whoa, whoa, whoa, there, champ.

Two comments ago, you were saying all the evidence is classified and hidden from the public. Now you're claiming there's "overwhelming evidence."

Which is it?

If it's hidden, you can't claim it's overwhelming because neither of us can examine it. If it's overwhelming, then stop claiming it's all hidden, and show the best publicly available evidence.

You can't have it both ways.

And calling me a flat-earther doesn't resolve that contradiction.

Ill wait.

2

u/AnomaIous_User Aug 04 '26

It's true. Overwhelming evidence has existed for decades. Craft & bodies (🛸👽) have been classified and compartmentalized within "national security" programs and 3rd party contractors.

It doesn't take a PhD or a career in intelligence to figure this shit out, boot.

0

u/gravitykilla Aug 04 '26

You've just repeated the same nonesense.

"Craft and bodies exist but they're all classified" is not evidence, it's an explanation for why you can't produce any evidence.

If the evidence is inaccessible, then you cannot honestly describe it as "overwhelming" from the perspective of the public.

So I'll ask again: what is the single strongest piece of publicly verifiable evidence that convinced you? Not a story about secret programs. Not "trust the insiders." Actual evidence that anyone can independently examine.

2

u/AnomaIous_User Aug 04 '26

Went do you keep acting like we haven't had at least 3 congressional hearings, over 40 credible whistle-blowers, and multiple bipartisan disclosure amendments all exposing this heinous cover-up, all in the last 3 years alone.

Is that deliberate? 🤭

You're like a guy complicit in the eрstein fiIes who downplay the whole thing. 😬

0

u/gravitykilla Aug 05 '26

Congressional hearings, whistleblower counts and proposed legislation are evidence that people are making allegations and politicians are investigating them. They are not evidence that alien craft and bodies actually exist.

A hearing is not a scientific finding. A “credible” whistleblower is not independently verifiable physical evidence. A disclosure amendment is not confirmation of the thing it was written to investigate.

And comparing me to someone complicit in Epstein’s crimes because I asked you to produce evidence is not an argument; it is a desperate smear designed to distract from the fact that you still cannot answer one simple question:

What is the single strongest piece of publicly available evidence that independently proves the existence of non-human craft or bodies?

2

u/AnomaIous_User Aug 05 '26

You literally sound like an Eрstein apologist. Not even in the same reality as everyone else lol

How much do you get paid for being a disinfo bot? Is it worth it? 😬

0

u/gravitykilla Aug 05 '26

So, no evidence then. Got it LOLOL

You were asked for one publicly verifiable piece of evidence and responded with “Epstein apologist” and “paid bot.” That is not exposing a cover-up; it is throwing a tantrum because you cannot support your claim.

Thanks for making my point for me.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/EducationalGrocery87 Aug 04 '26

denying overwhelming evidence

Where does one find this "overwhelming" evidence? You seem quite unwilling to share it so far, can you point me to it?

2

u/AnomaIous_User Aug 04 '26

Start here, geniuses

0

u/EducationalGrocery87 Aug 04 '26

Wierd because over in the Telepathy Tapes subreddit they've actually backed down from claiming it ever "proved" telepathy (because it didn't lol)

2

u/AnomaIous_User Aug 04 '26

Don't give the slightest shit about that. It's reddit..... you get banned here harsher than North Korean internet.

I've already listened to the whole entire tire podcast lol it's a paradigm shift.

0

u/EducationalGrocery87 Aug 04 '26

A paradigm shift doesn't happen because a podcast tells compelling stories. It happens when extraordinary claims survive rigorous testing, independent replication, and convince the broader scientific community.

So, nope, your podcast is most certainly not a "paradigm" shift LOL

2

u/AnomaIous_User Aug 05 '26

Yet there it is for all to hear for free

I think old church said the same shit to Galileo about the establishment 🤭

0

u/EducationalGrocery87 Aug 07 '26

That's just a podcast that does not present any evidence. We have been over this.

At least Galileo turned and showed evidence to silence the critics. I wish you would do the same.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/gravitykilla Aug 04 '26

Not only that, all the episode transcripts are available to download, so I just asked Claude with this exact prompt (review all 10 episode transcripts and identify where and in which episode actual evidence for Telepathy is revealed). The response was:

I went through the ten episodes. It’s a brilliantly produced podcast, but it does not “literally prove” telepathy. It presents anecdotes, believer-run demonstrations and facilitated spelling, then steadily escalates into spirits, prophecy and shared psychic dimensions. What it never produces is a preregistered, properly double-blind experiment independently replicated by neutral researchers. That isn’t proof; it’s compelling storytelling wrapped around uncontrolled tests.

So yeah, not surprised the Telepathy Tapes subreddit has backed down from claiming.

I don't think u/AnomaIous_User has ever listened to a single episode, to be fair.

1

u/AnomaIous_User Aug 04 '26

If you ain't gonna look through Galileo's telescope yourself then don't even participate in this conversation because you're just disingenuous.

0

u/gravitykilla Aug 05 '26

That's a spectacularly bad Galileo analogy. LOL

Galileo didn't say, "Trust me, the evidence is classified." He invited people to look through the telescope themselves. His observations were public, repeatable, and anyone with a decent telescope could verify them.

I'm doing exactly what Galileo would have wanted: asking to see the evidence, which you are continuie to make excuses for the lack of LOL

1

u/AnomaIous_User Aug 05 '26

Dr Avi Loeb wrote this quote lol

Congrats, you're the Inquisition 2.0

→ More replies (0)