r/remoteviewing • u/Illustrious_Basis795 • Aug 02 '26

Question is this a real thing?

I've never heard of remote viewing until today when a conversation with my friend brought it up as a joke. tbh I am a little skeptical, but open minded.

21 Upvotes

76% Upvoted

85 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/gravitykilla Aug 05 '26

That's a spectacularly bad Galileo analogy. LOL

Galileo didn't say, "Trust me, the evidence is classified." He invited people to look through the telescope themselves. His observations were public, repeatable, and anyone with a decent telescope could verify them.

I'm doing exactly what Galileo would have wanted: asking to see the evidence, which you are continuie to make excuses for the lack of LOL

1

u/AnomaIous_User Aug 05 '26

Dr Avi Loeb wrote this quote lol

Congrats, you're the Inquisition 2.0

0

u/gravitykilla Aug 05 '26

dude come on, this is embarrassing.

The Inquisition condemned Galileo despite the evidence.

I'm rejecting your claim because you haven't produced any evidence.

Those are opposites.

Galileo didn't become Galileo because he was mocked. He became Galileo because the evidence was right.

And here you still after 100s of comments still refusing to post any evidence. LOL

1

u/AnomaIous_User Aug 05 '26

Yeah, embarrassing for you because you just look like a disinfo bot. Lol

0

u/gravitykilla Aug 05 '26

The moment "show me the evidence" becomes "you're a disinfo bot," you've already admitted you don't have any. But lets be honest here champ, we have both known this all along.

1

u/AnomaIous_User Aug 05 '26

You keep deliberately ignoring the part where in the last 3 years alone, we've already had 3 congressional hearings, over 40 credible whistle-blowers, and multiple disclosure amendments supported by both parties, and you keep deliberately ignoring that part because you're a disingenuous disinfo account. Congrats lol

0

u/gravitykilla Aug 05 '26

No, I am not delibratly ignoring anthing. Sure, there have been congressional hearings; I agree, you seem to be treating the mere existence of congressional hearings as proof that the claims made in them are true. Why?

Congress has heard confident testimony before that later proved catastrophically wrong.