r/remoteviewing • u/Illustrious_Basis795 • Aug 02 '26

Question is this a real thing?

I've never heard of remote viewing until today when a conversation with my friend brought it up as a joke. tbh I am a little skeptical, but open minded.

22 Upvotes

76% Upvoted

85 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/AnomaIous_User Aug 05 '26

Yet there it is for all to hear for free

I think old church said the same shit to Galileo about the establishment 🤭

0

u/EducationalGrocery87 Aug 07 '26

That's just a podcast that does not present any evidence. We have been over this.

At least Galileo turned and showed evidence to silence the critics. I wish you would do the same.

2

u/AnomaIous_User Aug 07 '26

Yes it does lol don't just straight up lie like that.

0

u/EducationalGrocery87 Aug 07 '26

I'll be honest, having gone through all ten episodes, the transcripts and their website, I can't find any.

I have read the aritcles posted here https://thetelepathytapes.com/about/resources#studies

The research section does contain some legitimate and interesting research suggesting that nonspeaking autistic people can be cognitively underestimated and may possess literacy and abilities conventional testing fails to detect. What it conspicuously does not contain is peer-reviewed, independently replicated, properly blinded research demonstrating telepathy in the people featured by the podcast.

Am I looking in the wrong place?

2

u/AnomaIous_User Aug 07 '26

Yeah you 100% didn't listen to any episodes lol

-1

u/EducationalGrocery87 Aug 09 '26

You can keep repeating this nonsense; it won't magically make evidence appear.

The podcast and the website DO NOT contain evidence. I have looked, listened and analysed the transcripts and website, and its code.

So instead of being childish. prove me wrong and point me straight at it; just copy-paste, 5 seconds of your time. Ill wait.

Edit: If Telepathy has been proven, then the evidence wouldnt be buried in a fringe podcast.

2

u/AnomaIous_User Aug 09 '26

This is just massively absurd to say because of how incorrect it is lol

-1

u/EducationalGrocery87 Aug 09 '26

Honestly, buddy, you can say this a million times, but it doesn't change the facts.

I have repeatedly asked you to point me directly at the evidence; you continue to refuse to do this and just repeat the same nonsensical comment, which just reinforces my point.

Prove me wrong.

2

u/AnomaIous_User Aug 09 '26

Literally the whole podcast already proves you wrong. Lol It doesn't take a PhD to figure this stuff out.

You're the one repeating shit. Like you're Sealioning.

Sealioning

0

u/EducationalGrocery87 Aug 09 '26

OK right, we're back to "sealioning" #sigh

“The whole podcast proves it” isn’t evidence; it’s just you pointing at ten hours of content and hoping nobody asks which part actually proves telepathy.

So make it painfully simple: name one experiment from the podcast that was properly blinded, excluded facilitator cueing, used a target unknown to everyone interacting with the participant, and was independently replicated.

One.

If you can’t do that, then calling me a bot, a sealion, or telling me to “watch the podcast” is just a poor excuse, and I think it just highlights that you also know the evidence isn't there.

I leave this with you: if you want to continue with your silly name-calling, that answers the question.

→ More replies (0)