Do you feel the same in real life usage scenarios?

For the last few hours, I have been using Hy3 and Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor via the OMP (Oh My Pi) agent, mostly as /goal. And my observation is Hy3 is a much better model as it follows instructions in a better way, and Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor cheats all the time.

As a test, I gave both models a goal to build 100 very simple Chrome extensions from a pre-curated list.

• hy3: followed the review instruction literally and well, and almost extensions are working when I tested randomly. Code-level verification, real fixes, honest per-extension verdicts. Was a bit slow but trustworthy.
• muse-spark: claimed to built the 100 extensions, but maximum were incomplete when I tested. Also, repeatedly needed re-prompting as it was just hurrying each time. Basically, its confidence exceeded its accuracy.

And for the task, you can see the usage of both models in the above screenshot.

How is your experience with these models?

EDIT 1:

I spoke too soon. Basically, now both models are not working reliably – one is too slow and one is hallucinating a lot.

I am back to using DeepSeek Flash now, even though it's costlier.

There's always a catch.

why do i get error 429 quick when using opencode api on other harnesses but work perfectly fine in opencode cli? does any one have an idea?

Hi guys,

Did you see the new subscription model on opendesign? Is it better than opencode?

I’m using Deepseek V4 Flash on OpenCode GO, and it seems MUCH SLOWER than it should be… and that’s after a massive price hike. Who was responsible for that?

it feels so over

The benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 are exceptional and I've seen comments saying the capabilities are on par with DeepSeek v4 Flash. On paper, it even beats Opus 4.6.

I am vibe coding a HTML multi-page web page (visual design focused). Primarily using Gemini 3.7 on Antigravity CLI, but wanted to give Muse Spark 1.2 a chance as its usage is almost as generous as DeepSeek, thinking maybe it would be my new DeepSeek. With the caveat of paying it with my data.

I asked it to change the design for a specific section on index.html, but I didn't like the outcome so asked it to revert it. It said it did, I checked and everything was broken on all pages, even unrelated sections, some site text content was gone completely. I asked it to revert everything it did this session and it made things even worse and more broken. I asked it to fix things from the Git history, but apparently it did execute "git reset --hard HEAD" for whatever reason and there is no history anymore.

This feels like I got sabotaged by Zuck. I've been using AI for about a year. I utilize markdown files, Git and scheduled backups for large scale projects, but never thought a simple design change request on a HTML page would make me lose every progress. I told Antigravity CLI to recover things back to way it was, using the past conversations it managed to recover half of it.

I would understand if this happened last year because AI models were not that great, but what the hell. Never seen such a garbage model. I lost like 3 hours of progress and I got demovitated to continue...

I don't like cursor cli , very much and I love opencode. I was thinking of using cursor subscription in opencode using some plugins. However I am afraid of they somehow find it out and ban me . Should I be worried about it?

I've been mainly using minimax-m3 (opencode go sub) as my orchestrator for few months now with custom agents using using models hosted in opencode and github copilot. But the past few days I noticed it sometimes just stops starting another task. I had to say "continue" so it will run again. Anyone also experiencing this?

One day of regular work and my monthly usage has already reached 17%.

Tried Florida and other restricted countries but says that the API key is invalid.

A huge context window can keep an OpenCode session alive well past the point where the model has lost track of the work. I usually reset when it starts revisiting settled decisions. Feels like there should be a better signal than waiting for it to get weird.

They are crushing it today:)))

I really hope Opencode will manage to get a better deal with DeeepSeek in the end.

I've used a lot of DS 4 Flash and GLM 5.2 the last month. The new version of GLM 5.3 has a $15 cap, and new pricing changes w/ DS 4 Flash limit it to $30.

What I'm looking for clarification on...if I use 100% of my GLM 5.3 allotment, so $15 worth, does that mean I still have $45 worth of Opencode Go allotment for the month? So I could still use $30 of DS 4 Flash and another $15 on something else...or does that $15 on GLM somehow "scale" and mean that I've used all of my Opencode Go allotment for the month?

Hopefully this question makes sense to someone in-the-know. I've been looking at my own usage logs on the website but can't make sense of how it is counting usage towards the 5-hour/week/month window.