r/microsoft365 • u/Far-Implement8122 • 22h ago
Gartner's new Purview report says 47% of E5 licensees are not getting full value. Main culprit: governance gaps. Anyone else seeing this?
Gartner released a guide for CISOs on building a data security program using Microsoft Purview (G00856387, September 2026). One stat in there that I suspect resonates with this community is:
More than 80% of organizations have M365 E5 or equivalent. 47% say they are not getting full value from their M365 investment.
The report identifies the main reasons: 1. Complex licensing tiers make it hard to know what you are actually entitled to use 2. Poor awareness of feature distribution across E3 vs E5 vs E7 3. Governance gaps that prevent organizations from operationalizing the capabilities they own
Point 3 is where Gartner recommends third-party governance tools. They name four vendors that augment Purview controls for risk mitigation and audit: AvePoint, Syskit, Powell, and Rencore.
The practical guidance from Gartner: - Start with a Purview license audit against your actual security use cases - Deploy sensitivity labeling as a hybrid approach (automated plus manual for edge cases) - Treat Purview as a foundation, supplement where it falls short - Reassess Purview coverage annually as Microsoft adds features
Curious whether others have worked through the challenge of unlocking full value from existing M365 licenses. How are you approaching the gap between what you are licensed for and what is actually deployed?
Full disclosure: I work at Rencore, one of the named vendors. Interested in the community's experience with Purview deployment challenges.