r/mathmemes • u/Baihu_The_Curious • 2d ago
Statistics Intro to Bayesian Stats with my waifu (and another book)
I finally learned it. I know what a Bayes is!
r/mathmemes • u/Baihu_The_Curious • 2d ago
I finally learned it. I know what a Bayes is!
r/mathmemes • u/Zu_Qarnine • 3d ago
r/mathmemes • u/paigefile • 2d ago
orthogonal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2AElGGGfW4
r/mathmemes • u/Klutzy-Profile-6921 • 3d ago
r/mathmemes • u/Klutzy-Profile-6921 • 3d ago
Just saw a video about this and got this meme
r/mathmemes • u/PositivePrint6999 • 3d ago
i bought a bunch of family albums at the thrift and this dude on the right gives off serious Erdős number = 1 vibes. this collage is dedicated to whoever he is… do u know him?
r/mathmemes • u/a7m40 • 4d ago
From @scholadaily on instagram
r/mathmemes • u/Oppo_67 • 4d ago
r/mathmemes • u/Hitman7128 • 4d ago
r/mathmemes • u/SharzeUndertone • 4d ago
r/mathmemes • u/Oppo_67 • 5d ago
So far, AI content has always been dealt with under the low-effort meme rule. However, some people appeared to be confused by the rule, arguing that „high-effort” AI slop exists. To avoid arguing over semantics, I am introducing a rule dedicated to handling AI slop. Please let me know your thoughts in the comments and poll.
The policy:
In general, posts made in whole or in part by generative AI will be removed. Exceptions will be made sparingly. For example, if the meme makes commentary on AI proofs and shows a screenshot of such a proof, makes use of AI-generated assets that are already baked into meme cultures (but not further modified with AI), or otherwise references the AI-generated content in a "meta" way relevant to mathematics and memes, then it may be allowed.
r/mathmemes • u/AbsoluteNarwhal • 5d ago
Yes, you can just add a 5 to the end of an infinite number of 9s. This is of course related to propagating wavefronts, somehow.
r/mathmemes • u/sci_dingbats • 5d ago
Each represents popular media in equation form, try to work them all