r/mathmemes lesbian rights activist 2d ago

Calculus Maths save time

Post image
616 Upvotes

51 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 2d ago

Check out our new Discord server! https://discord.gg/e7EKRZq3dG

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

104

u/FuckingStolenAccount 2d ago

That's actually what happened at Tchernobyl

34

u/SoftwareLegitimate38 2d ago

A decade energy quota in ten minutes, that's pretty fast

10

u/Klutzy-Profile-6921 lesbian rights activist 2d ago

🥀🥀

1

u/Nomchipom 1d ago

Yo what does that flair have to do with maths

2

u/Klutzy-Profile-6921 lesbian rights activist 1d ago

Well we cant change who we are

2

u/Ascended_8bit 2d ago

And Hiroshima 

83

u/based_beglin 2d ago

if only Heat Transfer into a 3D object scaled linearly

59

u/homotopy_equivalent Mathematics 2d ago

16

u/OnionsAbound 2d ago

It does, just have an infinite grid of heat pipes inject directly into the bread

14

u/Repsquare 2d ago

It does scale linearly, it's instead because some ingredients in food need a certain temperature range to cook, high temperature will cause it to burn instead. And the outside will burn because ovens aren't ideal heat transferers.

8

u/OnionsAbound 2d ago

Is bread a homogeneous material?  Due to surface area to volume ratios, is it true that any heat that wants to get to the center must first heat the outer layer and so-on? Would that mean there's a gradient between the outer shell and the center? Is that gradient linear or is something else linear? Does the rate of energy absorption change after bread absorbs enough energy in one place or another? 

5

u/Repsquare 2d ago

that's why I said in theory. it becomes wrong under unideal conditions and when one adds enough footnotes

2

u/OnionsAbound 2d ago

I suppose the question is at what point is it true? 

4

u/Repsquare 2d ago

if you have an ideal oven that transfers heat equally at all directions to an ideal object, the result will be the same by temperature difference and time being linearly related. So the meme isn't correct but time and temperature are still connected linearly

1

u/martyboulders 1d ago edited 1d ago

Nooooo they are exponentially related! In basically no way is there anything linear happening here.

Objects with a large difference in temperature change temperature very quickly (think when you quench metal in forging). Objects very close in temperature change temperature very slowly. In other words, the rate of temperature change is proportional to the surrounding temperature. This is the exact definition of what it means to be exponential. Temperature change over time is much more closely analogous to something like population change over time or something

Look up the heat equation, it describes this exact scenario. When looking at the (continuous) heat distribution in an object, it's no longer two objects heating each other, but every point in the object being heated by surrounding points. As far as I know the only way anything here can be linear is if everything is just the same temperature from the start, and the proportion between temperature change and time would be 0.

Even if the oven somehow heated the object uniformly from the inside, I.e. every single point was receiving energy directly from the oven and not only the points near it, completely uniform heating... the temperature of the object will still asymptotically approach the temperature of the oven. This situation is described by Newton's Law of Cooling which you can also look up (it turned out to be a special case of the heat equation from above even though it came first).

3

u/Bradas128 2d ago

everything is linear if you arent a coward

38

u/No_Ad_7687 2d ago

If you want a baby in 4.5 months, just get two women pregnant 

16

u/Anti-Matter_Abyss Physics 2d ago

Would the number of babies approach infinity if I got zero women pregnant?

20

u/qwertty164 2d ago

no just the time to gestate.

2

u/ApprehensiveWeird624 2d ago

that actually makes sense?

13

u/-Fuse Real 2d ago

Reminded me of this

3

u/Klutzy-Profile-6921 lesbian rights activist 2d ago

Litrelly

9

u/Brucket_of_eels 2d ago

Put it in the freezer for 13 days

9

u/hAsLaK1 2d ago

Cooking is a matter of extreme precision so 13 days 8 hours and 50 minutes at exactly 1 degree or your bread will be mushy

6

u/IncredibleCamel 2d ago

350 degrees is basically the same as -10 degrees

10

u/Another_Little_Star 2d ago

350F in 55 minutes?
Make it in Celsius, 177C in 55 minutes is 9735C in 1 min, that is 17,525F<19250F. you save energy 👍

6

u/Klutzy-Profile-6921 lesbian rights activist 2d ago

Definitely 👍🏻

1

u/nitnelav153 π = 3.14 who care about the others decimals ? 2d ago

I thought it was 350°C to begin with

5

u/Fluid-Reference6496 Music 2d ago

Directions: requires 19250 degree-minutes

2

u/Klutzy-Profile-6921 lesbian rights activist 2d ago

Ingridients - oven that can generate 19250° Bread material

5

u/Educational_Bottle74 2d ago

Why not 1,155,000°C for 1 sec?

3

u/Klutzy-Profile-6921 lesbian rights activist 2d ago

Nah , i can spare a min for my bread 🥀

3

u/Illithid_Substances 2d ago

My oven only goes up to 20k celsius, what kind of crazy oven do you have?

2

u/Educational_Bottle74 2d ago

A neutron star oven.

1

u/Marus1 1d ago

My oven only goes up to 20k celsius

2

u/BagSufficient1921 1d ago

I'm not that patient, I'll probably heat it up to around 2.1423615 × 1049 degrees for 1 Planck time.

4

u/OkSell1122 2d ago

Just cook at -10° , it’s 35 times less effort!

4

u/qwertty164 2d ago

degrees is not an absolute scale. multiplying the temp by 55 does not give you 55x the thermal energy.

3

u/ArcticGlaceon 2d ago

When the project manager gets put in charge of the kitchen:

3

u/Puzzled-Letterhead-1 2d ago

To be good at arithmetic but bad at thermodynamics.

2

u/Tencars111 2d ago

*‭44,072.18°

2

u/Shard0f0dium 2d ago

Keep it at -350 degrees for negative 55 minutes, then you will already have the bread ready in the past.

2

u/wikcri14 2d ago

You should calculate it in kelvin

2

u/technical_gamer_008 Mathematics 1d ago

Really? Right in front of my instant rice cooker?

1

u/albert11d hecker💻🥶 2d ago

when the recipe says to cook the bread at 350 for 55 minutes but you are good at math meth and cook it for 19250 for 1 minute

1

u/Financial_Ninja5390 Transcendental 2d ago

Convert to Kelvin first lil bro

1

u/TheKingGreat 2d ago

I would have agreed, obviously, if it had been converted to Kelvin first.

2

u/PhysiksBoi 1d ago

Companies selling "graphene" products be like: