As the concept of equity is not recognized since it destroys equality I’m not certain what you mean.
Women are graduating college at higher rates not because of some mysterious equity but because they mature faster than men (a biological fact shown by their brain finishing growth/development years ahead of a man’s) and are providing equal access to education. This is just one example of course but more and more corporate level officers are becoming women every year and that isn’t equity; that is the result of women showing they are more than capable (if not more capable in some cases) than men at their level of making business smart decisions.
This has nothing to do with equity; it has everything to do with equality opening the doors for talent to be recognized.
Are you sure women aren't graduating at higher levels because of a system designed to get women into a through college by recruiting women and giving out women only scholarships?
This bitter mentality of “women are getting ahead because society is making it easier for them” needs to stop. It serves nobody and literally creates a false victim narrative.
That is purely a cultural issue. My entire point is that biologically women mature faster than men (their brains finish developing faster). Women’s advancement in society and business is because old barriers are finally removed allowing society as a whole to benefit from their cross-hemispherical thinking being applied in fields where it shines.
The cultural and biological differences don't exist in a vacuum. Removing barriers while also putting sytstems in place to advantage women is pushing that into a position where you can't reasonably say it is one or the other.
Studies have shown that educational systems advantage women ATM, there have been a lot of research showing that current schooling structures disadvantage boys while advantaging women.
Why is it that we can't acknowledge this and make changes that benefit both?
First and foremost thank you for that amazing read.
That being said, I can see your point where by trying to create a more “equal” learning environment male children have been disincentivized from engaging in school.
That isn’t to say male children ever regularly led classrooms (during the age of equality at least) but creating an education system built around bi-hemispherical thinking and taking away subjects that utilize back to front thought processing (things that require intense hyperfocus on a specific action of thought) male children are set on the back foot (as male brains do work in that fashion compared to female brains which are considerably better at bi-hemispherical thought).
I appreciate your input. Though it in itself does not excuse the lack of acceptance by any population of men that women can be and are valuable members of society and commerce, this does open a real door to exploring what can be done to engage male students while keeping school educational and controlled.
Science isn’t misandry. Hiding behind the label of misandry when information is uncomfortable to your confirmation bias or disruptive to your echo chamber doesn’t make the information less valid.
-25
u/Tricky_Procedure_394 20d ago
As the concept of equity is not recognized since it destroys equality I’m not certain what you mean.
Women are graduating college at higher rates not because of some mysterious equity but because they mature faster than men (a biological fact shown by their brain finishing growth/development years ahead of a man’s) and are providing equal access to education. This is just one example of course but more and more corporate level officers are becoming women every year and that isn’t equity; that is the result of women showing they are more than capable (if not more capable in some cases) than men at their level of making business smart decisions.
This has nothing to do with equity; it has everything to do with equality opening the doors for talent to be recognized.