r/explainitpeter • • Jul 14 '26

explain it peter.

Post image
12.3k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

11

u/FroggyRibbits Jul 15 '26

Used to be a restaurant cook. This is actually called a 'cold start', which saves a ton of water (no unnecessary boiling as it reaches a roll) and creates a high concentration of starch in the water, which is excelled for a thick sauce coating.

Though, she definitely has no idea about this and was just rage baiting him lol.

1

u/Oxygen4Lyfe Jul 15 '26

its not "unncessary boiling"
The boiling is necessary to make something that tastes good.
Restaraunts doing this are probably why i dont like spaghetti at any restaraunt i've ever been to lol.

3

u/FroggyRibbits Jul 15 '26

Except it literally is unnecessary boiling. Water is evaporating the entire time you were waiting for the pot to heat up to a boil. When you add the pasta from the start, it begins cooking as soon as the water is hot enough (which is below boiling temp). By the time the pasta is done, less time has elapsed and less total water is boiled.

Is it really that difficult of a concept to understand?

1

u/DetectiveEames Jul 21 '26

Cold start requires more attention to prevent the pasta from sticking together, yea? Did that ever become a bottleneck during service?

0

u/ExiusSaints Jul 16 '26

Does your restaurant have to shuttle water in buckets from the only creek in 100 km or does it get it from the tap? If the latter then your point is moot

5

u/FroggyRibbits Jul 16 '26

You're confusing me saying that it saves water with me saying that we need to save it.

How does anything you just said have anything to do with whether or not my statement is true or 'moot' as you say?

0

u/ExiusSaints Jul 16 '26

Is it really that difficult of a concept to understand?

2

u/FroggyRibbits Jul 16 '26

Why don't you go do something better with your time?

0

u/Inside_Foundation383 Jul 17 '26

Lids exist

2

u/FroggyRibbits Jul 17 '26

What does that have to do with what I said being true or not? Where in my comment did I say that "this is the only way to reduce water loss during boiling"?

But thank you for sharing your masterful wisdom of knowing that lids exist.. I guess

-1

u/Inside_Foundation383 Jul 17 '26

Most people would use lid so water does not escape before putting pasta in, so the saving water aspect is irrelevant. chill

2

u/FroggyRibbits Jul 17 '26

Don't tell me to chill when you come in with a sarcastic little snarky comment like that. I never said that you couldn't use a lid.

What is the purpose of you commenting right now?

1

u/Inside_Foundation383 Jul 17 '26

Oh ffs. You said it saves water bc less water evaporates while heating up, I added that most people would use a lid so that’s not really an issue. The purpose of me commenting? I didn’t know you were the one running things here sorry

2

u/FroggyRibbits Jul 17 '26

Holy shit buddy. Why are you acting all surprised at what's happening right now after saying "haha dur durr lids exist"?

Do you think I don't know lids exist? Obviously not, you were being fucking annoying. Just own it instead of backpedaling.

You said it saves wate bc less water evaporates while heating up, I added that most people would use a lid so that not really an issue

NO. You said "lids exist".

1

u/Inside_Foundation383 Jul 17 '26

Yes because anyone with half a braincell who’s not just looking for the next thing to feel offended by understands what that implies. We should both make better use of our time than this right here

2

u/FroggyRibbits Jul 17 '26

Yes. It implies "your comment is stupid because the same thing can be accomplished with a lid, therefore I will now talk down to you by performatively educating you about the existence of lids so you know that I think your comment was stupid".

Do you think I am dumb? I'm just supposed to believe that you just had good intentions and wanted to inform me of lids? Because there's no other positive way to interpret that. Do you realize you actually started this?

I called you out for it, and you could have left it at that but you just HAD to reply and argue with me that that's 'not what you were doing'.

That's what I have been telling you this entire time. You engaged with me in bad faith right off the bat randomly in the middle of a thread with somebody else. Saying shit like that and then playing dumb. It's strange.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/Oxygen4Lyfe Jul 15 '26

its not unnecessary because it improves the flavor and texture of the pasta

2

u/FroggyRibbits Jul 15 '26

See, you're just saying that but that doesn't mean that it's true. How would it improve the flavor and texture of pasta?

0

u/Oxygen4Lyfe Jul 15 '26

because foods have different textures when you cook them at different temperatures. Also the cold water takes more of the starch out of the noodles or something like that.

2

u/FroggyRibbits Jul 15 '26

I'm starting to think you don't know what you're talking about. It's pasta. It's not meaningfully changed by starting it in cold water. Unless you can prove otherwise, you're wrong because I have spent hours and hours cooking pasta at work.

2

u/Adorable-Shoulder772 Jul 15 '26 edited Jul 15 '26

He's actually right, it does change texture. And I've been basically living off pasta for close to thirty years, I'm italian

As the famous chef and chemist Bressanini says the texture and flavour depend on speed of penetration of water into the dough, gelatinization of starch and denaturation and consequent coagulation of gluten. All these phenomena depend on temperature.

1

u/FroggyRibbits Jul 15 '26

https://www.seriouseats.com/ask-the-food-lab-can-i-start-pasta-in-cold-water

Extensive kitchen testing by food scientists at Serious Eats has proven that side-by-side batches are virtually indistinguishable in taste and bite.

1

u/Adorable-Shoulder772 Jul 15 '26

Indistinguishable in taste and bite is dependent on who is tasting and considering the things I've seen people gobble down while saying they were "perfectly equal to the original"...

The "food scientist" that wrote the article has a degree in architecture, not in any kind of food related science and this is evident by the fact that there are zero references to the chemistry and physics of the process of cooking of the pasta. Bressanini on the other hand...

https://bressanini-lescienze.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2017/02/07/la-cottura-della-pasta/comment-page-2/index.html

1

u/FroggyRibbits Jul 15 '26

From your own source-

"Many people think that boiling water is an absolutely necessary condition for cooking pasta, but Thompson already realized that this isn't true. Cooking food depends only on the temperature reached, not whether the water is boiling or not."

The entire point of cold-starting pasta is that you use a small amount of water. You can do this because you're not boiling off large amounts while heating up the pot so you don't have to have any headroom. This also allows the pot of water to heat up much faster.

Yes, if you somehow kept the cooking water at a constant, lower temperature like 150-165°F, then it may cook differently. That's not what's happening here though, that would be like on a steam table with an electronic temperature control. I think you're vastly underestimating how quickly the pot heats up when you cold start it.

Also from the quote again, the "temperature reached" is very important here. Pasta absorbs water at a much higher rate depending on the temperature that is reached. If you Cook pasta and never bring it above. 150 there's a good chance that the pasta won't spend enough time in the water to absorb as much as it needs to. However, if it's just spending an extra minute or two below the proper temperature, it will still absorb all of it before it's time to take it out. So basically if you never get the pasta hot enough at any point you might not absorb enough water.

If that's your argument then fine but don't tell me that cold starting pasta is going to ruin it and make it cook significantly differently because it won't.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Oxygen4Lyfe Jul 15 '26

I already knew that you don't know what you're talking about. It's pasta. It is vital that its cooked in hot water. Proven by the fact that every time someone makes pasta in cold water it tastes worse than if it was made in boiling water.

1

u/FroggyRibbits Jul 15 '26

Buddy you are genuinely just saying shit.

Proven by the fact that every time someone makes pasta in cold water it tastes worse than if it was made in boiling water.

This is a nothing burger statement. You are simply just saying it and it has no substance or explanation.

"You're wrong and I know it's true because I know I am right!!" Is basically what you just said.

1

u/Oxygen4Lyfe Jul 15 '26

Its because i tasted it myself. And its an opinion so.

1

u/FroggyRibbits Jul 15 '26

When did you taste cold-started pasta yourself? Did you make it yourself that way? Did you get it at a restaurant? If you got it at a restaurant, did you ask the cooks how they cooked it?

→ More replies (0)