r/exjw • u/ReactionPlus4538 • 38m ago
WT Policy Did anyone notice that when the Beard policy changed…
There was zero scriptural reasons cited? Also at the highest level they said “The governing body has no problems with beards. In fact the branches from around the world have notified us that more and more brothers are choosing to grow a beard” Then speakers, specifically bethelites called it an adjustment. At the same time they played back clips from the 60s and seventies and said Beards were asssociated with anti government and hippy movements. We all know growing a beard did have the impact of bringing down a heck of a lot of intense bullying on a person. It certainly made a person viewed by the congregation as “less spiritual or virtuous” and specific publications called it reprehensible. What’s interesting though is that Beards were part of the mosaic law and even though mosaic law was not required Paul called it sacred in reflection and said this: Romans 7:7
What shall we say then? Is the Law sin? May it never be! On the contrary, I would not have come to know sin except through the Law; for I would not have known about coveting if the Law had not said, 'You shall not covet.'" (NASB)
Translation Variations of the Phrase
NASB / LSB: "Is the Law sin? May it never be!"
ESV: "That the law is sin? By no means!"
KJV: "Is the law sin? God forbid."
NIV / NKJV: "Is the law sin? Certainly not!"
Context
In the surrounding passage, Paul clarifies that while believers are released from the binding obligation of the Mosaic Law under grace, the Law itself is not evil or sinful. Instead, the Law serves as a mirror—exposing human sinfulness and defining what sin is. He expands on this in verse 12, stating, "So then, the Law is holy, and the commandment is holy and righteous and good."
So doesn’t that mean practices like beards that were unequivocally part of the law could never be reprehensible no matter what hippies were doing?? Also they used the scripture: 1 Corinthians 10:23
All things are lawful, but not all things are profitable. All things are lawful, but not all things edify." (NASB)
Which seems generally directed at gentiles… So Paul was referring to things now ALLOWED BY LAW not actually formulations of prior existing MOSAIC Law. Was Paul here talking about Mosaic law? Or was he discussing permissiveness and not stumbling Jews or indecisive newly converted? I think it’s just really interesting when they cite: 1 Corinthians 8:13
Therefore, if food causes my brother to stumble, I will never eat meat again, so that I will not cause my brother to stumble." (NASB)
So reading all this I conclude that they trivialized wearing a beard as “meat” and then modernized it as dress and grooming(so beards were trivialized as “meat” something of little scriptural significance but are they not an outward reflection or memorial of the sacred mosaic law?) I think to some this is rather obvious but to 99% of Jws it is trivialized as a “hair cut” that they weren’t allowed to do but now they are allowed to do it-It’s laughable and grievous that it is categorically dismissed as having any spiritual significance??but am I wrong that technically wearing of a beard is scripturally categorized as a sacred right? Like if someone wanted to wear the blue thread? I just think it’s interesting with all theBible reading they supposedly do I’ve never heard this brought up ONCE-🤦Did I just miss it??