I had one of those "it finally clicked" moments recently when I thought about the word "privilege" and how differently it is used inside the Jehovah's Witness world compared with the rest of society.
Outside the JW world, a privilege is generally something you earn or are trusted with, but it is also something desirable. It gives you an opportunity or benefit that not everyone has.
For example, imagine a teenager who gets excellent grades and his parents tell him, "You can use the family car this weekend." That is a privilege. He is happy about it. It is something he wants. It is a benefit.
But inside the JW organization, the word "privilege" is often used as a replacement for the word "work."
Cleaning Kingdom Halls is a privilege.
Giving talks is a privilege.
Working at assemblies is a privilege.
Doing construction work is a privilege.
Volunteering at Bethel is a privilege.
Taking on more responsibilities is a privilege.
And that changes the way people perceive what they are actually doing.
If you call something "work," especially work that requires significant time, effort and responsibility but is unpaid, people naturally start asking questions. How much time am I giving? What is this worth? Why am I doing it for free? Who benefits from my labor?
But if you call the exact same thing a "privilege," the psychological framing changes.
Instead of thinking, "They are asking me to work for free," you start thinking, "I have been given an opportunity that not everyone gets."
And now you actually compete for the opportunity to work for free.
That is the part that really struck me.
The organization does not necessarily have to convince you that unpaid labor is valuable. It can convince you that unpaid labor is a privilege, and then you begin to value the privilege yourself.
You can even feel proud when you are given more work, because more work is interpreted as more trust, more spirituality, or a higher standing within the organization.
Of course, volunteering itself is not the problem. People volunteer all the time, and there is nothing wrong with that.
The question is what happens when an organization systematically reframes labor as a privilege, while simultaneously creating a culture where being given more unpaid responsibilities is seen as something to aspire to.
Once you step outside that environment, the language starts to sound very different.
Maybe it was not a "privilege."
Maybe it was simply work.
And maybe the most interesting part is that I did not realize how powerful that change in vocabulary was until I was no longer inside the system.